Posted on 10/26/2020 6:22:30 PM PDT by weston
I hope Rudy & the team are on it. What they should have done or need to do immediately is secure the ballots before they "mysteriously" are destroyed or gone missing or replace or......
It is absolutely ridiculous the told us they were going to do this, then they did it, and were caught, & they are going to continue? After being caught?
Not much of a looker & doesn’t seem to have a nice personality.
I think you can do better.
Good luck.
Prayers up weston!
Yes, I can see where that would be annoying after a while.
Nobody likes an annoying drip.
Oh, dear. Sleep well.
Thank you!
Not a very fun date but you don’t have to worry about how your “date” voted in the election at east.
Oodles of well wishes for you!
Lin Wood
@LLinWood
·
Nov 11
Hand recount NOT sufficient in GA. Must do audit so that only LEGAL votes are counted. Takes time.
Problem is entire election was fatally flawed by
@GaSecofState
consent agreement with Democratic Party on 3/6/20.
Massive fraud on top of that flaw.
@BrianKempGA
must act. NOW
https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1326580826226700290?s=20
You’re in our thoughts and prayers.
Peobody’s post..November 12, 2020
Trump’s Pennsylvania complaint is brilliant
By James V. DeLong
The complaint filed in Pennsylvania by the Trump campaign is a superb piece of legal craftsmanship.
It was filed in federal court, not state. The gist is that some of the state’s actions, and particularly the exclusion of Republican poll-watchers during the counting of hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots, violated federal constitutional requirements.
The point is obvious enough once one thinks of it, but it’s brilliant all the same. It shifts the focus from state law, where a politicized Pennsylvania court has the last word, to federal law, where the U.S. Supreme Court rules.
As for the obviousness of the point, consider as a thought experiment a state law requiring that all votes be counted in secret by an unelected board named by the party in power. Could it survive a constitutional challenge?
As my old Harvard constitutional law professors would have said, “to ask the question is to answer it.” It is hard to count all the constitutional guarantees violated here: Equal Protection, Due Process, Privileges and Immunities. Indeed, the complaint stacks up the Supreme Court precedents supporting its arguments, including the long line of ringing statements in the chain of one-person-one-vote decisions.
Even the late Justice Ginsburg, who never met a progressive argument she could not support, would have trouble upholding such a law.
Given this framework, the historic decision in Bush v. Gore becomes useful but unimportant. The problem there was that the Florida Supreme Court pretended to be interpreting state law, and the legal convention is that the U.S. Supreme Court must defer on state issues, even though the Florida court was making up new law as it went along and changing its mind shamelessly.
The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Bush v. Gore was muddled by the need to wiggle around this problem without addressing it head-on, because it would not do to cast doubt on the integrity of fellow judges. (The union is strong.) Only a three-justice concurrence said flatly that the Florida Court was contradicting the Legislature, and that would not do. Four justices went off on an opaque Equal Protection argument.
A result of this muddle, say friends in academia, is that progressive legal scholars are contemptuous of the decision and dismiss it as irrelevant.
Trump’s Pennsylvania case does not have the complication of the state versus federal law interaction because it jumps over the state law and, as noted, relies on a host of U.S. SCOTUS cases about the importance of voting.
The complaint has much more, designed to bolster its central point. Many other instances of fraudulent activity are cited, which lends credibility to the main accusation. They are also indispensable to establish a factual case — that the exclusion not only occurred, but mattered, because thousands of ballots were counted in secret.
Reading the news reports, it appears likely that similar complaints are going to be filed in other swing states and that perhaps we are seeing the exposure of a broad-based effort to corrupt the election. Joe Biden claimed that the Democrats were mounting the biggest voter fraud effort in history, and a good rule for living is that when someone tells you he is about to screw you over, believe him.
It is possible, then, that a number of cases will hit the Supreme Court in about three weeks.
Everyone in the legal world assumes that the justices, bruised by the excoriation the Court has received over Bush v. Gore (even though the result was right), would never put itself in the position of reversing the apparent results of a presidential election. This assumption is the reason for the Democrats’ efforts to create an irresistible bandwagon effect, but the president’s lawyers may have out-maneuvered them. The justices may have no choice except to decide the election, one way or the other, and to be put to the choice of reversing the media-claimed results or ratifying massive fraud.
The legitimacy of the Court could survive through, and even be enhanced by, a carefully explained reversal of initial results. It could not survive a mealy-mouthed ratification of obvious fraud. If Trump’s lawyers make their case factually, the Court must agree.
As Lincoln said: “we cannot escape history. We ... will be remembered in spite of ourselves ... in honor or dishonor, to the latest generation.”
I was listening to the GA SOS on NewsMax this morning & it made me wonder.
He was saying that they can only do a recount of 1 state-wide election, so obviously, they had chosen the Presidential race. He said they would look at the ballots and put the each in a stack - Trump, Biden, Other. Then count the ballots in each stack.
As he was saying that I was wondering if they would even look at the ballots to see if “Biden” was the only person selected on the ballot & no down-ticket candidates. That would raise an obvious red flag.
I thought he was just giving a top-level synopsis of the counting process, but apparently not. I sure hope Doug Collins & other GOP’s are on top of this. What happened to the audit & recanvas that we were promised along with the recount?
Read this sworn affidavit from GOP poll challenger, and former Assistant AG for Michigan, Zachary Larsen, on the alleged fraud he observed in Detroit.
This is Third World stuff, and every American should be outraged if these allegations are true
I believe there can be no doubt that the democrat vote stealing and other methods of fraud surfacing now have been going on for a long time.
As others have pointed out, one probable reason so much of their fraud is becoming obvious and apparent now is that the democrats
got caught short because of Trump's RED WAVE and needed far more fraudulent votes than they had planned for.
So they had to ramp up their fraudulent vote manufacturing to generate a much greater number of fraudulent votes.
It was a rush job that required more time, involved more people and caused them to resort to unusual and riskier methods.
Any people added were no doubt less well trained, less competent, and less well versed in their usual methods of secrecy and subterfuge.
To some extent that probably explains why they were caught in unplanned acts like filling out hundreds (or thousands?)
of ballots with only the presidential vote filled out and like filling out fake ballots in the back of a van behind a polling place.
I don’t know he said audit and recanvass yesterday. I did not know the Senate race would not be recounted. That is crazy.
I have been trying to get this information out to everyone I can think of but I don’t feel I’m being heard. It would take 10s of thousands of us to be heard. I feel so helpless and sick over it all.
I also have been pressing Kemp to call a special session of GA legislature too.
Justice Department probe ends with no action against prosecutors who oversaw Epstein deal
Nov. 12, 2020, 10:15 AM PST By Sarah Fitzpatrick, Tom Winter and Pete Williams
FTA
A Justice Department investigation found that federal prosecutors who oversaw a controversial non-prosecution deal with Jeffrey Epstein in 2008 exercised “poor judgment” but did not break the law, Sen. Ben Sasse said Thursday.
The announcement followed an investigation by the Justice Department’s Office of Professional Responsibility into the conduct of former federal government lawyers, including ex-Labor Secretary Alex Acosta.
“Letting a well-connected billionaire get away with child rape and international sex trafficking isn’t ‘poor judgment’ – it is a disgusting failure,” said Sasse, R-Neb. “Americans ought to be enraged.”
The Justice Department has yet to release its own statement on the investigation’s findings. A spokesperson for the FBI, which investigated the case, declined comment.
Prosecutors looked into allegations that Epstein abused dozens of teenage girls in his West Palm Beach mansion in the early 2000s. He eventually pleaded guilty to state charges involving a single victim in a deal that ended the federal sex crimes investigation and spared Epstein the prospect of serving several years in prison.
I too, assumed a hand recount & audit would include the entire ballot. If they determine a voter is not legal for the Presidential election, will they disqualify the entire ballot, or just the Presidential vote?
I bet they are busy throwing away Trump ballots right now. I hope someone is watching and videoing everyone coming and going from precinct places.
These people are going to cheat to the end.
I heard Collins in an interview last night. What a doof. He was only interested in upcoming Senate race. I could hardly understand him. He said a whole lot of nothing!! Needs to be replaced by someone not from the swamp.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
