I didn't have my glasses on and asked, "Why in the world are you wearing that shirt? You don't even like Starbucks." She said, "Daddy, read the shirt. I got it at a gun show." Yes, that was a proud daddy moment.
Good. Not needed, not wanted. Good riddance.
Burnt, overpriced coffee is a problem?
Welcome to the club. Starbucks has been on my Do Not Buy list for many years.
Is this Communist Revolution already eating its own?
Liberals eating their own. You have to be 150% on agreement with the leftists agenda to avoid becoming a target.
>> “we ain’t shopping at Starbucks no more.”
Guessing the “ain’t” ever shopped at Starbucks...
Gotta love leftists eating their own.
Starbucks is running out of fans
I’m not a fan. We have a local place called Elijah’s that is AWESOME. Starbucks is burnt and thus extra bitter, even with half cream and two sugars on top of caramel flavoring.
At Elijah’s, I can get a Hazelnut latte for the same price and not have to add extra sugar.
Since the incident at a Philadelphia Starbucks where a manager tried to make someone who didn’t purchase anything leave, they’ve had a policy of letting anyone who wants to come in and hang around, without purchasing anything. They had some special training to make sure their managers won’t eject anyone. Now there are many such people hanging around at urban Starbucks, and paying customers would rather go elsewhere.
Did that satisfy the loons? Of course not. A virtue signaler like Howard Schultz, or whoever is running the company currently, will just try to do some new thing to satisfy them.
“Starbucks’s first store opened in Seattle in 1971” with the help of Cosco, also from Seattle. The owners of both companies planned to grow together and have done very well. The problem is that Starbucks has garbage coffee: picked from the worst crops that are full of pesticides. Burnt coffee? The taste of pesticides. The Starbucks in Berkeley has been boycotted since the 1980’s and the Starbucks on Haight St. in San Francisco has been boycotted by locals since they opened. Peets coffee, owned by Starbucks since 1990, has a better product.
Odd, because of the huge ad on the yahoo site I searched the Seattle news stations and couldn’t any mention of the Starbucks protesters marching through Seattle. One would think that such a huge march would gather more attention given the potential for violence and arson...but crickets
Any hard news source about this protest march?
So your years of sucking up to tyrants haven’t paid off,eh? Tough nuts!
I didn't have my glasses on and asked, "Why in the world are you wearing that shirt? You don't even like Starbucks." She said, "Daddy, read the shirt. I got it at a gun show." Yes, that was a proud daddy moment.
Burnt coffee aside, they never once said how Starbucks “supports” SPD and what they don’t want them to do. Do they want them to refuse service to SPD? Refuse to call SPD if they need help?
Quality reporting from Yahoo! News.
Wow, the anarchists and commies can afford Starbucks?
Pampered little darlings.
Funny how they keep attacking their own. The left is like one big suicide party.
I once heard an angry Starbucks employee tell a co-worker that the world’s population could live in a place half the size of Texas. I think his point was that humans are raping the earth or causing global warming or killing jungle bears or something.
I’ve been boycotting them since my first and last cup of their burnt brew.
Everybody gets a turn at the being the focus of the zombie mob...especially those dumb enough to try to appease the zombies in the past.