Posted on 07/01/2020 4:02:42 PM PDT by weston
Wow. I think there’s money to be made, and some politics, that is causing this.
Thank you so much for posting this with the pictures too.
Isn’t that infuriating NIKK? On so many levels.
https://twitter.com/tommyg/status/1284136633219063809?s=21
Don Lemon hates President Trump but has sympathy for Pedophiles. Listen folks we’re in a real battle. This isn’t Republican vs Democrats, this is Good vs Evil! Pick a side #DonLemon #Politics #Pedophilia
I only listen to Biden as much as my health will allow. I remember listening to him a few months ago, and every single thing he said he would do, President Trump had already done. It was like he listened to the President and then plagiarized it. Since plagiarizing is what he does best.
How did your son’s pitching with a mask go?
Public employees are for the Democrats, because they will have job security, better wages and benefits under Democrats.
The State of Texas today had to remove 3,484 cases from its Covid-19 positive case count, because the San Antonio Health Department was reporting “probable” cases for people never actually tested, as “confirmed” positive cases.- TDHS
What other departments make this same mistake? pic.twitter.com/wYhGWhHl5w— Steve Eagar (@steveeagar) July 16, 2020
Same here, homegrown produce is much more prevalent than it was in California. But California does export theirs.
It’s the same except for the wineries. We have stills :-)
Here is more information from the state on the nearly 35-hundred San Antonio “probable” cases removed from Texas’ “positive” case count from the state. Although the CDC is mentioned, a positive Antigen test is also considered a “probable” case in guidelines adopted by @TexasDSHS pic.twitter.com/pRR70GmKVF— Steve Eagar (@steveeagar) July 16, 2020
Our farms are in pockets of the state. Northern part is flat and much corn and soy grown in their enormous fields. Ours are has both sandy soil, loam and clay. The sandy areas of the state grow lots of produce. Vegetables. At one time the SW area grew thousands of acres of Purdue Pop (oville Redenbaucher).
The nations largest egg producer has his main offices in my county. But most “farms” are distributed throughout the US. Now we are producing pork the same methods that chickens were once grown. In huge pole barns. They never see the light of day.
Indiana like Tennessee is very diversified. Still has small farms that grow for neighbors and families. People still live “close to the earth”!
“We used to be the best. This started when they quit teaching real subjects, reading, writing, math, science, etc., and they quit passing students on objective tests.”
Very true! But apparently we weren’t being dumbed down fast enough so they instituted Common Core.
Q #4581, #4582 & #4583 available
Just-released Trump-Russia documents show anti-Trump leaks to NYT were shockingly wrong — 9 times
The first document is a 57-page summary of a three-day FBI interview in January 2017 with Christopher Steele’s ‘primary sub-source’ in the anti-Trump allegations and ‘dossier.’ Document number two takes apart a New York Times article written by Michael Schmidt, Mark Mazzetti, and Matt Apuzzo.
By Sharyl Attkisson Last Updated:July 17, 2020 - 4:13pm
FTA
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) has released two newly-declassified documents related to government surveillance abuses against the Trump campaign in 2016.
The first document, withheld from public view until now, is a 57-page summary of a three-day FBI interview in January 2017 with Christopher Steele’s so-called “primary sub-source” in the anti-Trump allegations and “dossier.”
According to the analysis by Sen. Graham’s office:
The document reveals that the primary “source” of Steele’s election reporting was not some well-connected current or former Russian official, but a non-Russian-based contract employee of Christopher Steele’s firm. Moreover, it demonstrates that the information that Steele’s primary source provided him was second and third hand information and rumor at best.
Critically, the document shows that Steele’s “primary sub-source” disagreed with and was surprised by how information he gave Steele was then conveyed by Steele in the Steele dossier.
Document number two, also withheld from public view until now, takes apart a New York Times article written by Michael Schmidt, Mark Mazzetti, and Matt Apuzzo.
Comments made by then-FBI agent Peter Strzok undercut a litany of claims made in the Times article, which was entitled: “Trump Campaign Aides Had Repeated Contact With Russian Intelligence.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.