Q #4581, #4582 & #4583 available
Just-released Trump-Russia documents show anti-Trump leaks to NYT were shockingly wrong 9 times
The first document is a 57-page summary of a three-day FBI interview in January 2017 with Christopher Steeles ‘primary sub-source’ in the anti-Trump allegations and ‘dossier.’ Document number two takes apart a New York Times article written by Michael Schmidt, Mark Mazzetti, and Matt Apuzzo.
By Sharyl Attkisson Last Updated:July 17, 2020 - 4:13pm
FTA
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) has released two newly-declassified documents related to government surveillance abuses against the Trump campaign in 2016.
The first document, withheld from public view until now, is a 57-page summary of a three-day FBI interview in January 2017 with Christopher Steeles so-called primary sub-source in the anti-Trump allegations and “dossier.”
According to the analysis by Sen. Graham’s office:
The document reveals that the primary source of Steeles election reporting was not some well-connected current or former Russian official, but a non-Russian-based contract employee of Christopher Steeles firm. Moreover, it demonstrates that the information that Steeles primary source provided him was second and third hand information and rumor at best.
Critically, the document shows that Steeles primary sub-source disagreed with and was surprised by how information he gave Steele was then conveyed by Steele in the Steele dossier.
Document number two, also withheld from public view until now, takes apart a New York Times article written by Michael Schmidt, Mark Mazzetti, and Matt Apuzzo.
Comments made by then-FBI agent Peter Strzok undercut a litany of claims made in the Times article, which was entitled: “Trump Campaign Aides Had Repeated Contact With Russian Intelligence.”
Q #4584 & #4585 available
Q
#4582
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jul/17/peter-strzok-fbi-crossfire-hurricane-watching-trum/
Q
#4583
https://twitter.com/EmeraldRobinson/status/1284104344225423361
What would be the primary purpose of inflating C19 numbers?
Who benefits the most?
Pro-America v Anti-America.
Infiltration.
All assets deployed.
Election not virus.
Q
#4584
https://twitter.com/andrewbostom/status/1283404442088484864
CDC C19 data [actually] lower than reported?
Why did select [D] govs [4] mandate nursing home C19 positive insert?
Election not virus.
Win by any means necessary.
Q
#4585
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/18/health/cdc-coronavirus-lab-contamination-testing.html
How do you provide cover for invalid ‘positive’ test results?
Think pawpaw.
THE SWAMP RUNS DEEP.
THE NEWS IS FAKE.
THE WAR IS REAL.
Q