Q Anon: 12/06/19 Trust Trump’s Plan ~ Vol.196, Q Day 770

qmap.pub ^ | 12/6/19 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

(h/t bitt)

Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.

Q describes this awakening as follows:

"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).

When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.

When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.

"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.

When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.

The choice is yours, and yours alone.

Trust and put faith in yourself.

You are not alone and you are not in the minority.

Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.

WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)

We discuss Q drop content on our threads to learn the truth about the capture of our country, after a lifetime of reading, watching and listening to lies and distortions used to control us and tame the American spirit. The truth shall set us free.

For summaries of Q drops (i.e., posts) discussed on our threads, I invite you to read the latest editions of The Oracle, which include helpful links and quotes to explain Q drop content.

Q drops can be found here in their original format.

Links to our Q threads, and Q drops posted on our threads, are listed in this table.

The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?" Another excellent source for identifying Q's involvement with President Trump is found at the website titled Qproofs.com.

Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.

Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.

In the battle between Good and Evil, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. The changes heading our way and the information revealed will, at times, be very difficult to face, but we will face it together. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger for having reclaimed the truth and freedom of thought.

Where We Go 1, We Go All

Note: Links in the post above are included in a resource table linked in Post #2 below, along with many additional excellent links to the best Q analysts and informations sources we've identified.

[fatima]

Looks like OB to me.

[bitt]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7767471/Grizzly-shows-cub-rub-against-tree-trunk.html

cuter than kitties?

[fatima]

Here’s another
https://twitter.com/RealErinAtkins/status/1203806790258962432

[SteveH]

> Those are Q posts. In the context of those posts MOS can only be Mossad.

Thanks. I personally would probably agree with all but the last, which still seems ambiguous to me. I do think the context in which these acronyms are used are important.

Thanks again.

[little jeremiah]

It is a surety.

[bitt]

We have it all...

[blu]

Thanks, LJ!

[bagster]

Those are Q posts. In the context of those posts MOS can only be Mossad.

BLAM!

[fatima]

Mossad is last with Q.We don’t have the answers.

[little jeremiah]

So...are you saying that Trump should have gone after Hitlery a long time ago and everything would be better, or something else? What makes you think Hitlery et al have not been investigated? Or are off the hook somehow? Or am I misunderstanding you?

With a huge cast of criminals, including foreign agents, and US citizens working with foreign entities engaged in multitudes of serious felonies, over several years, take a long time to investigate and create an air tight case.

That is what has been happening, and now time the fun time is getting closer.

[bitt]

please give it a rest - we’re trying to READ here...

[little jeremiah]

My pleasure.

[SteveH]

By the way, by citations I was actually hoping someone would come up with something external to Q— a formal citation such as would be found in a published non fiction book or article.
(Still, something is better than nothing.)

[The Toddler]

Thanks. I personally would probably agree with all but the last, which still seems ambiguous to me. I do think the context in which these acronyms are used are important.

But for the last one not to be Mossad he would have to change the meaning of what he has previously posted. So MOS would mean Mossad in some instances while meaning something else in others. That is a bad interpretive scheme. Let Q interpret Q. This would mean that in light of other instances there is strong evidence that MOS means Mossad unless countervailing evidence exists.

[SteveH]

this is a discussion thread? i am just responding to comments (some containing personal attacks) by others.

[nanetteclaret]

No it’s all about you wasting everyone’s time.

[bitt]

++++!

[Bigg Red]

Mark

[generally]

Thanks for bringing this over to us. OUTSTANDING thread.

I completely agree with Cates. (Not hard to do; he is rarely wrong. His research is thorough.)

At this point, I just wonder how much of the report will be redacted. Are we gonna see it all? That would be great. If not, I’ve seen enough of the plan to appreciate that there’s a good reason.

Amazing.

[SteveH]

OK, but is Q’s lexicon an exclusively 1-1 correlation?

I am dimly recalling that we had no such guarantee, at least in the past.

There is a q lexicon online but I am a bit fearful to post it lest i trip over some fr rule. It does not appear to contain “MOS.” I recall a FR lexicon in the past but I can no longer find it in a quick search (i do believe i can recall who maintained it in the past but that may not help, at least on short notice).