|
Posted on 10/07/2019 6:13:19 PM PDT by ransomnote
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
We discuss Q drop content on our threads to learn the truth about the capture of our country, after a lifetime of reading, watching and listening to lies and distortions used to control us and tame the American spirit. The truth shall set us free.
For summaries of Q drops (i.e., posts) discussed on our threads, I invite you to read the latest editions of The Oracle, which include helpful links and quotes to explain Q drop content.
Q drops can be found here in their original format.
Links to our Q threads, and Q drops posted on our threads, are listed in this table.
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?" Another excellent source for identifying Q's involvement with President Trump is found at the website titled Qproofs.com.
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between Good and Evil, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. The changes heading our way and the information revealed will, at times, be very difficult to face, but we will face it together. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger for having reclaimed the truth and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Note: Links in the post above are included in a resource table linked in Post #2 below, along with many additional excellent links to the best Q analysts and informations sources we've identified.
little jeremiah wrote:
“This one is from 15 hours ago:
“Good to see you got the message, @LindseyGrahamSC.
Being friends is much better than being enemies.
After all, what is knowledge but the keys to power.
-
Now, stay on target.
We are less than two weeks out.
You have nothing to fear.— EyeTheSpy (@TrueEyeTheSpy) October 8, 2019”
“
Two weeks out.
I wonder what EtS heard.
Very late to the party but glad to be here!
Re Greta Pawn:
Hysterical!
Follow the rabbit???
[snicker]
Well played.
In before my weight.
‘Sometimes the moment chooses us’: Emails reveal Rosenstein-Mueller secrecy on Russia probe
Then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein was determined to keep his big secret about a pending special counsel right up to the day his top candidate, Robert Mueller, sat down with President Trump in the Oval Office.
“The boss and his staff do not know about our discussions,” Mr. Rosenstein said in an email to Mr. Mueller on May 12, 2017.
Mr. Rosenstein’s “boss” was an apparent reference to Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who had stepped away from any role in the Russia probe. This meant that Mr. Trump didn’t know, either.
The email was one of a thread of messages that the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch obtained from the Justice Department under a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit.
Mr. Trump has claimed that the purpose of Mr. Mueller’s May 16 White House visit was to interview him for the vacant FBI director post. Mr. Mueller, a former FBI director, has said the meeting’s purpose was to discuss the bureau in general.
Whatever the purpose, John Dowd, Mr. Trump’s attorney during the ensuing 22-month probe, said Mr. Mueller had a duty not to meet with the president knowing he was likely to be investigating the Trump campaign.
“The most dishonorable conduct I have ever witnessed,” Mr. Dowd told The Washington Times.
Noting Mr. Mueller’s military service, Mr. Dowd added: “Capt. Robert Mueller, USMC, sits in front of his commander-in-chief being interviewed for FBI director knowing he is going to investigate the president and never says a word.”
That same day, May 16, Mr. Mueller also visited Mr. Rosenstein at the Justice Department.
“I am with Mueller,” Mr. Rosenstein said in an email to Mark Filip, a former deputy attorney general now in private law practice. “He shares my view. Duty calls. Sometimes the moment chooses us.”
The next day, Mr. Rosenstein shocked the White House. Without consultation, he announced that Mr. Mueller would take over the Russia probe, launching a historic investigation that would attract a staff of mostly Democratic prosecutors. He gave Mr. Mueller wide latitude to investigate Mr. Trump and his campaign associates, saying “any links” with Russia should be probed.
May 2017 was a particularly tumultuous month inside the Justice Department and the FBI.
Mr. Trump fired FBI Director James B. Comey on May 9. The White House cited a memo written by Mr. Rosenstein on how Mr. Comey crossed the line in announcing no charges against Hillary Clinton for her mishandling of State Department emails.
Aghast, Mr. Rosenstein almost immediately began a hunt for a special counsel. His inbox filled with demands from liberal nonprofit groups to appoint one. He didn’t believe he had written the memo to justify a firing.
The next day, Mr. Rosenstein made his first overture to Mr. Mueller.
An aide emailed Mr. Mueller’s law firm, WilmerHale: “I’m writing to try to arrange a meeting between Mr. Rosenstein and Bob Mueller, hopefully for Friday [May 12] morning — anytime before 10 a.m. Can you let me know if Mr. Mueller would have any time? Thanks so much!”
A Mueller assistant replied 24 minutes later: “Can we do it at 8 a.m.? Also would it be possible to get a parking spot for Mr. Mueller inside the building.”
On the night of May 12, Mr. Rosenstein sent the boss-doesn’t-know email to Mr. Mueller.
The next morning, Mr. Mueller wrote to Mr. Rosenstein: “Rod if you have a moment would you please give me a call.”
By May 16, the deal seemed done. Mr. Rosenstein again met with Mr. Mueller and sent the “sometimes the moment chooses us” email. Mr. Mueller spent time that same day with the president. Mr. Rosenstein announced the appointment on May 17.
“These astonishing emails further confirm the corruption behind Rosenstein’s appointment of Robert Mueller,” said Judicial Watch chief Tom Fitton.
Judicial Watch released documents in September about another traumatic event unfolding inside the Justice Department that May.
Mr. Rosenstein, acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe and other aides met to discuss the Comey firing — the same day Mr. Rosenstein met with Mr. Mueller and Mr. Mueller met with Mr. Trump.
The group’s suspicions immediately turned on Mr. Trump as a target in the Justice Department’s Russia election interference probe.
In an astounding discussion, Mr. Rosenstein offered to wear a wire during a meeting with the president to record the conversation and ask him his motivations, according to a contemporaneous memo written by Mr. McCabe.
“He said he thought this might be possible because he was not searched when he entered the White House,” Mr. McCabe wrote. “I told him that I would discuss the opportunity with my investigative team and get back to him.”
The wire caper apparently never happened.
Mr. McCabe, who would be fired the next year for allegedly lying to investigators about a leaked news story, acted on May 16 to investigate Mr. Trump as a possible Russian spy and election collaborator.
A year later, Mr. Rosenstein discussed how to respond to a 2018 New York Times story about the wire and about invoking the 25th Amendment to remove an incapacitated president.
The story apparently came from the fired Mr. McCabe. He talked about the incident while selling his book, “The Threat.”
Mr. Rosenstein ended up issuing a statement: “The New York Times’s story is inaccurate and factually incorrect. I will not further comment on a story based on anonymous sources who are obviously biased against the Department and are advancing their own personal agenda. But let me be clear about this: Based on my personal dealings with the President, there is no basis to invoke the 25th Amendment.”
Mr. Mueller completed his final report in March. While Mr. McCabe implied that Mr. Trump is a Russian spy, the 448-page report offers no such evidence. Mr. Mueller was assigned to find “any links” with Russia by any Trump associate or Mr. Trump himself.
The Mueller report said: “The evidence we obtained did not establish that the president was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference.”
In July, Mr. Mueller appeared before two House committees at the insistence of Democrats.
Rep. Louie Gohmert, Texas Republican, asked him about his May 16, 2017, meeting with the president.
Asked whether he planned to investigate Mr. Trump for firing Mr. Comey at the time he was appointed special counsel, Mr. Mueller answered, “I’m not going to get into that. Internal deliberation from the Justice Department.”
“Were you talking to him about FBI director position,” Mr. Gohmert asked.
“Not as a candidate,” Mr. Mueller said.
“Did he mention the firing of James Comey in your discussion with him?” the congressman asked.
“Cannot remember,” Mr. Mueller said. “I don’t believe so, but I’m not going to be specific.”
“If he did, you could have been a fact witness as to the president’s comments and state of mind on firing James Comey,” Mr. Gohmert said.
“I suppose that’s possible,” Mr. Mueller said.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/oct/7/rod-rosenstein-robert-mueller-emails-reveal-trump-/
Thoughts on infiniate chan.
Since the resurrection of Q Team’s chan seems to be on the near horizon, I was ruminating a bit on what the return might look like.
I’m sure there will be a ‘grand opening’ type feeling from Anons, and the new site will instantly become a magnet for trolls, shills and bad guys, along with Anon.
There will be a zillion shills and LARPs trying to emulate Q drops. FReeQs must be cautious about glomming on those posts.
In time, as the dust settles a bit, Q Team will need to post some bona fides to establish credibility (and probably something like a tripcode).
This will probably be a picture, or phrasing, backed up by an open sourse Q+ tweet, statement, or action. Once established, I think we’ll rejoin the D5 avalanche that is starting to plunge down from the mountainside at this very minute.
Good times ahead, but be cautious, FReeQs.
(don’t forget to review old drops in new light)
Interesting analysis on that thread.
I’m not convinced the scrubbing and panic started just five months ago though.
In the darkest reaches of Q research, scrubbing started as early as Nov/Dec 2017 - right after anons started digging. It might have started sooner than that, maybe during pizzagate.
First scrubbed, I’d say, were the really nasty low-level things like Epstein, Ray Chandler, Alefantis, and some others. Now that we’re getting higher in the cabal pyramid other more innocuous things disappear - financial records, company profiles, the money laundering tools of the ‘elite’.
I do agree that they never bothered to cover anything up because they knew they were all protected.
Might explain how a lot of the Podesta brothers’ garbage is still out there and available.
Meanwhile, when on digs, archive what you see and THEN post. That way it won’t get disappeared before it can be shared.
Thanks, Little J!
FBI’s Use of Foreign-Surveillance Tool Violated Americans’ Privacy Rights, Court Found
U.S. discloses ruling last year by Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that FBI’s data queries of U.S. citizens were unconstitutional
WASHINGTON—Some of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s electronic surveillance activities violated the constitutional privacy rights of Americans swept up in a controversial foreign intelligence program, a secretive surveillance court has ruled.
I can’t participate and dig as much as I would like to, but I want you to know I love you all. Keep up the good work.
Always the left eye.
mark
“Meanwhile, when on digs, archive what you see and THEN post. That way it won’t get disappeared before it can be shared.”
Very good advice; I rarely do any real digs, just a bit-o-copy and paste from twitter and whatever else turns up. But I will keep in mind and hopefully others do this already. When FR researchers commenced heavy digging into 0bola’s background, stuff started to disappear off the internet that they posted on FR. So they learned to save offline before posting anything.
“I’m not convinced the scrubbing and panic started just five months ago though.
In the darkest reaches of Q research, scrubbing started as early as Nov/Dec 2017 - right after anons started digging. It might have started sooner than that, maybe during pizzagate.”
I agree, they did start scrubbing earlier, but they got MUCH more frantic after they realized Mueller was not taking Trump down. Their hopes were pinned on that. Now they are feverishly clutching at very weak straw hoaxes.
EtS can be very cryptic; I don’t know what to think.
Case in point: I archived off all of Hillary’s posted travel when she was SoS during the time she “fell” because of a “nasty flu” (2012-2013). When I returned to the State Dept’s calendar some time later - it was ALL gone.
I’m on the fence about ETS. Some of his past posts make me think he’s a LARP, but once in a while he comes up with a nugget.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
