Posted on 06/22/2019 9:29:56 PM PDT by EdnaMode
Earth's nearest neighbours have turned into uninhabitable hellholes. Understanding their transformation will teach us which rocky exoplanets might be fit for life
CLOSE to the sun lie a pair of sizzling coals. You could be forgiven for thinking these strange worlds were two circles of hell: Mercury, a black and blasted plain, and Venus, a sweltering world beset by rain of pure acid.
But for all the terror of their outward appearance, their insides are remarkably familiar. Along with Earth and Mars, they form the solar systems only rocky planets, a stark contrast to the bloated gas giants that make up its outermost worlds. In the language of those hunting for extraterrestrial life, such planets count as potentially habitable. In fact, if we found a Mercury or a Venus in a solar system far from our own, we might even call them Earth-like.
So what caused these seemingly Earth-like planets to become so resolutely, well, not? Was it some accident of composition, or millions of years spent in an inhospitable environment? Getting to the bottom of these questions, and understanding the diversity of rocky planets, is of paramount importance for astronomy. Without clear answers, we arent only ignorant of our own solar systems history, but blinkered in our search for life elsewhere.
Part of the problem is that the innermost planets are incredibly hard to visit. Only two spacecraft have ever made it to Mercury and of the numerous Venus landers, none survived longer than 90 minutes.
(Excerpt) Read more at newscientist.com ...
“Earth’s nearest neighbours have turned into uninhabitable hellholes.” Really? How do you know that and when were they not “uninhabitable hellholes?” Always start with a false premise and watch the liberals fall in line. Nonsense.
im not so sure mercury is an ‘uninhabitable hellhole’
maybe the author was thinking of Chicago (or SF or LA or Detroit or/?) instead?
speaking of this ridiculousness, where is that UFO guy? seems like his handle started with a Q.
*not to be confused with the present day Q freaks, of course.
1) Too small or too big
2) Too close or too far from sun
3) No magnetic field to protect an atmosphere from the solar wind and cosmic rays
4) No moon to provide tides
5) Improper tilt or rate of rotation
6) Unlucky history, e.g. hit by enormous asteroid or rogue planet
7) Insufficient amount of liquid water
You mean QUIX!
Thanks EdnaMode.
![]() |
||
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe · | ||
Google news searches: exoplanet · exosolar · extrasolar · | ||
That would be Quix. He's no longer in residence here, but still lurks.
I was sort of keeping in touch with him, but mea culpa, I'm not too great at that. [blush]
One night with Venus, a lifetime with Mercury.
The cosmic equivalent of them anyway.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.