|
Posted on 04/30/2019 11:29:37 AM PDT by ransomnote
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this transformation as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3028)
We discuss Q drop content on our threads to learn the truth about the capture of our country, after a lifetime of reading, watching and listening to lies and distortions used to control us and tame the American spirit. The truth shall set us free.
For summaries of Q drops (i.e., posts) discussed on our threads, I invite you to read the latest editions of The Oracle, which include helpful links and quotes to explain Q drop content.
Q drops can be found here in their original format.
Links to our Q threads, and Q drops posted on our threads, are listed in this table.
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?" Another excellent source for identifying Q's involvement with President Trump is found at the website titled Qproofs.com.
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between Good and Evil, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. The changes heading our way and the information revealed will, at times, be very difficult to face, but we will face it together. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger for having reclaimed the truth and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Note: Links in the post above are included in a resource table linked in Post #1 below, along with many additional excellent links to the best Q analysts and informations sources we've identified.
So the UNC shooter was autistic. Not surprised.
Wonder what his meds are and who his advisors are.
I wonder if he's seeing a therapist who has recently moved to another city?
LUV your notes on the Barr hearing. THANKQ!
LUV your notes on the Barr hearing. THANKQ!
I think that's what all this "muh investigation" by the Dems is all about. The Dems NEED to know who is being investigated for what...so they can start cobbling together the needed lies and false paper trails to cover their asses. Starting with Nadler, there just ain't enough paper to cover those derps!
Thanks for the heavy lifting. Both watching and note taking.
Good video. He left out how we blew it after 9/11, too.
I would have loved to hear him go on but seems he was under a time frame that ended. They were probably counting down the seconds until they could cut him off.
This is news to me:
Rush is reporting today that all the whining the derps have done to see the unredacted version of the Mueller report, Barr has granted their wish and some time ago. The report is in a secure place (a SCIF?) so it can be viewed.
Rush said to date, only TWO people have gone in to view it, and that would be Rep. Doug Collins and ol’ Lindsey Graham. Two repubs. NO dems have viewed it.
Steenkin’ bastids!
Rush is reporting today that all the whining the derps have done to see the unredacted version of the Mueller report, Barr has granted their wish and some time ago. The report is in a secure place (a SCIF?) so it can be viewed.
Rush said to date, only TWO people have gone in to view it, and that would be Rep. Doug Collins and ol’ Lindsey Graham. Two repubs. NO dems have viewed it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It still has some redactions - I think this “less redacted” version still redacts ongoing investigations/grand jury stuff and THAT’s what the Dems are searching for. So they pretend that the availability of that “less redacted” version just isn’t good enough.
One of the two who looked at it commented that they didn’t know why the full redactions version removed some of the content it did (i.e., unnecessary redactions of content).
Lindsey Graham said that there was an unredacted report there for the Senators to view (classified)
In his extensive report, Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller notes that his investigative team did not “obtain or examine” the servers of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) in determining whether those servers were hacked by Russia.
Instead, Mueller’s assessment of the DNC’s allegedly hacked servers relied upon the investigations conducted by the FBI and other agencies. “The Office understands that the FBI, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and the states have separately investigated that activity,” reads Mueller’s report.
However, the DNC famously refused to allow the FBI to access its servers to verify the allegation that Russia carried out a hack during the 2016 presidential campaign. Instead, the DNC reached an arrangement with the FBI in which a third party company, CrowdStrike, conducted forensics on the server and shared details with the FBI.....
Lindsey Graham said that there was an unredacted report there for the Senators to view (classified)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I keep finding “less redacted” in search results and that only two were willing to look at it. Wonder wut’s goin’ on.
I might be wrong, but Lindsey was speaking at the beginning of the hearing
Any public official afraid to be surrounded by armed constituents is a public official the people should be armed against.
WWG1WGA
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
I don’t know about the rest of the freeqs on the thread but I am so livid I can’t speak. Having to watch this Barr hearing today has been demoralizing. The democrats have been such a complete and total disgrace that I am uncertain the government could ever recover credibility enough to gain my trust in their governing again.
I thought their conduct toward Kavanaugh at his hearing was the new low. Obviously I was mistaken.
Arrests have to happen soon or we will be past the point of no return.
Notes continue after lunch:
PART TWO
BARR HEARING ABOUT MUELLER REPORT BEFORE SENATE JUDICIARY CMTE
[TEXOKIE NOTES/TAKEAWAYS - Not a transcript]
5/1/19
GRAHAM
[Came in late bc of FOX commentary late coming in]
Barr seems to be clarifying the situation of the defensive briefing brought up earlier.
KENNEDY
Addresses humans’ need to be heard. He wants to understand the Mueller / team to see if they have changed their conclusions - today.
At one point Mueller team was unhappy as evidenced by the letter from then which B released today.
B: It’s conclusions as to what?
K: as to collusion/ conspiracy
B: Not that I’m aware of
K: Of the decision not to bring an indictment o the President as to collusion / conspiracy has not changed? Nor for obstruction has not changed?
B: No
K: I take it the Mueller team was unhappy when you received the letter from Mr. Mueller?
B: I can’t speak to the team as a whole, When I spoke with Mueller he was concerned about the press coverage it had gotten the previous few days and he felt it needed more context as to why M and the team did not make a finding / decision about Obstruction. He wanted Barr to put out more info,
K: verified that the release of the Report actually took care of that concern found in the letter. Barr was not going to be in a position to be reesponding to the press by giving more and more data here and there, Mueller had wanted Barr to give out the Executive Summaries. However these summaries were not already vetted and needed redaction. Barr explained his position was to put out the report as rapidly as possible. Which he had the authority to decide to do.
Kennedy notes that we cannot control the press and what they print.
Asks Barr to go over the Muller team investigating obstruction….. WHY did he not make a finding? Barr said he couldn’t recapitulate it. Barr and his own people did not understand the reasoning. K says regardless of the reasoning, he did not issue an indictment.
K speaks of the two investigations: that of DJT and also of Hillary. How did the Hillary one start? We have a duty to find out why these investigations were started, who started them and the evidence on which they were started. WE hope you will do that and get back to us. [Barr does a small nod]
He is asking for the Prez and Barr’s release of “all documents pertaining to the 2016 election, with appropriate redactions. This would achieve letting the American People see the facts without having to go through a lot of spin and leaks, and rumors, etc. When you are investigating leaks in the DOJ and the FBI, I hope you will include the Mueller team as well. [Barr maintains neutral face]
KLOBUCHAR
[Known to us as JENNYASS OUT IN THE SNOW because she made her Presidential bid announcement out in a Raging Blizzard]
“I’m going to take us out of the weeds here”…… and gives her views without asking questions.
*4 page letter is a summary
*She said Barr had to go out of his way not to mention the letter in an answer about it
*We must hear from Mueller because you have said you didn’t know his thinking
She brings in the Russian interference.She has been working with Sen Lankford to get a “Secure Elections Act” passed.
She said White House admin made calls to stop it. She asked if Barr was aware of that. He said “NO.” She asks him if he will work with Sen Lankford and Herself to get this bill done. The act would require the use of back up paper ballots at all polls among other things.
Barr: I will work with you to secure our elections. I’m not familiar with your proposal and look forward to seeing it.
K:GRU targeted state and local agencies. They accessed data and also introduced malware into systems. Would you commit to have the FBI conduct a briefing to all senators on this?
Barr: just on Florida situation?
K: No an the entire Russia situation,
B: Sure
K: brings up situation of IRA buying ads, and that Graham and she are trying to put together honest ads legislation. Will you help with that?
B: In concept, yes.
K: a third concern from B’s confirmation had to do with B’s views on obstruction. Would anyone causing a witness to change testimony constitute obstruction, and B had said yes.
She gets into the Michael Cohen’s issue whereby his family had been used as leverage against Cohen. Barr says No that it does not fulfill the subornation of perjury.
Barr gives some good answers, but I didn’t try to write it all down. It was two lawyers getting into the weeds on legal concerns. Barr explains exactly why the cases she is bringing up are NOT OBSTRUCTION.
She continued with other cases which in her view are obstruction. Gets into the McGahn situation again. Basically Barr is a bad person for not seeing these cases like she does. Barr returns that the it [the 10 potential obstruction cases] fails on 3 elements:
1 -[my paraphrase] not sufficient to show an obstructive act because it is unclear whether the Prez knew that to be false. In fact the Prez was focused on the fact that he didn’t tell McGahn to FIRE Mueller [Barr says “McGahn” here, but I believe he means “McGahn to Fire Mueller” in other words, “I never told you to FIRE MUELLER. I asked you to bring up the conflict of interest.]
McGahn had already given evidence. Prez thought because of the press reports, that it was wrong. They were saying McGahn was told to “Fire” Mueller. The evidence of those reports is in the President’s favor. He wanted the error cleared up by McGahn correcting the record.
K’s position is that the 10 constitute a pattern. Each one may not rise to the level of obstruction, but the overall pattern points to it.
[The FOX NEWS footnote states that Barr had “looked at all ten cases of possible obstruction” - and they each failed to meet the standard of obstruction. He did not get to the other 2 of the 3 elements because her time lapsed.
She might be perhaps doing some good with the secure election legislation with Lankford and others….yet she remains a JENNYASS in every sense of the term, imho]
SASSE
He goes to Russia and the GRU in terms of hacking. He asks about Derapaska and who he is.
B: stated he did not want to get into that in the open setting,
S: Quotes Dept of Treasury statement as to who he is. [Quite a list of skullduggery including murder, and states then that in open session we can certainly agree he is a “bad dude”
In vol one, the part that deals with Paul Manafort is actually about Derapaska. He wants Barr to give a 101 to American citizens about him and Russia, Nato, the Ukraine, and the rules governing payment to them and their involvement in US election campaigns.
Sasse thinks the report puts in a lot of important factual data on 2016 election…. And a major takeaway is that Russia and even China will be seeking to interfere with the 2020 elections and it is critical we understand how this makes us so vulnerable. How and to what extent should foreign intelligence services be involved in our elections, and what should the American people know about what is appropriate and what is not appropriate going forward?
Barr asked him to pare down the huge broad question.
S: Could Russia or China, as evidenced by the OPM hack, come in and survey the political talent and target people who they could use as leverage?
Could a foreign country just pay for people they target to join this or that campaign and do the foreign county’s bidding? Barr says he doesn’t think it would be legal. S points out that sometimes DC people are put on retainer and the work done for the entity paying them is sometimes obscure. S is asking B to make sure that this kind of question is addressed by Barr and DOJ - at least to give guidelines to different campaigns.
Also: Should we be adding to counter intelligence briefings for individuals who have won the nomination so they can be better informed and ready to be up and running in get event they win the Presidency? He gets into defensive briefings, and should those be broadened by congress?
B: Absolutely….. and B speaks of the subtleties and pervasiveness of the foreign agents’ activities. He even states the briefing of even more people in govt should also be included so as to have more education on this. [encroachments / attempts to encroach, by foreign nations etc.]
Barr: The pattern is that foreign entities descend on our people and seek to influence them. Sasse points out the it is easier now in digital age to surround our people.
COONS:
Follows up on Klobuchar and Sasse issue of election security and states we need Barr’s and the President’s leadership to get this done to protect our election processes.
Then gets into Vol two and Obstruction. Points out the efforts to protect the Spec Counsel. He is concerned with Barr’s March 24th letter.
His bottom line is we need to hear more about the Spec Counsel from the Spec Counsel. Efforts to fire the Counsel by Prez are troubling. C speaks of the lapse of 3 weeks before the report was released. Calls McGahn’s letter requested by Prez is the creation of a false report/record. Barr demurred by saying that what Coons said was one interpretation, but there are other explanations of the scenario possible and the govt could not make a case for obstruction on that case.
COONS goes into all the coulda woulda shouldas about how the timing of release of report and thinking of Mueller. He again, as others, wants Mueller to testify before the Committee.
C then goes on to paint a scenario for the future, if a foreign intelligence agent approaches a campaign saying they have dirt on the opposition, should it be a response by the campaign to immediately contact FBI, and not just say, “ok - let’s meet.” Barr agreed to that particular scenario. Do contact the FBI if foreign agent contacts a campaign with dirt.
Then C says that Russians approached the Trump campaign offered dirt on Hillary, and campaign did not contact FBI. Which he implies, of course, makes DJT a criminal…. And all of his team.
Coons continue to complain bout the Barr letter stating the report results. Reiterates they want to hear from Mueller.
HAWLEY
Commends use of word “SPYING.” Barr affirms this was unprecedented, and that the ones engaged in this hid their investigations from superiors and there was/would be no oversight. Barr will get back with the committee about what he finds in his current investigations about this.
Gets into the 25th amendment standards. Asks B if the Prez is in any way meeting the standard of 25th amendment. Barr attributes the effort to use 25th to individuals, not the organization as a whole.
H speaks of the particular individuals - He was shocked by the Aug 26, 2006, text by Peter Strozk read earlier by Chairman Graham -
Strozk helped launch the counter spy operation - the text referred to was the one about the “smelly Walmart” people. This unelected bureaucrat had such contempt about the American people, and felt he had the right to overthrow the President they, the People were choosing. That is what is going on here today. H comments on their [bad actors in DOJ and FBI] power and blatant prejudice and use that to overturn the election. That in H’s mind is the real crisis here. If this continues and there is no accountability, then we no longer have a democracy.
[texokie takes a break! More later.]
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
I agree, CP. I had to turn it off. I’ll look at it once it’s no longer live so I can fast forward through the evil.
I don’t know about the rest of the freeqs on the thread but I am so livid I can’t speak. Having to watch this Barr hearing today has been demoralizing. The democrats have been such a complete and total disgrace that I am uncertain the government could ever recover credibility enough to gain my trust in their governing again.
I thought their conduct toward Kavanaugh at his hearing was the new low. Obviously I was mistaken.
Arrests have to happen soon or we will be past the point of no return.
I listened to Graham’s opening statement. Turned off when DiFiChiSpy started. Knew my blood pressure would be off the charts if I listened. Thankful for people who can handle it for the updates here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
