A Weekly Dose of President Trump - Trump Family Train 4/27/19 to 5/8/19

Friends and Deplorable's | April 27, 2019 | DollyCali

[DollyCali]

THE WEEK THAT Was
THE GOOD, THE BAD
THE UGLY

GOOD ~ It's “Our Turn” now Libs

VERY GOOD ~ Rally tonight – Green Bay

NOT SO BAD ~ Trump and Pence at NRA

LAUGHABLE ~ NO Scandal during Obama's “reign”

UGLY ~Easter worshipper~

CELBRATORY ~Melania turns 49

EYE ROLL ~ The expanding list of RAT 2020 candidates for POTUS and he still MIA Ginsberg

Welcome all you Deplorables to this week's edition of the Dose!
This is EVERYTHING TRUMP.
Administration, family, frustrations, joys, winning!
We welcome your research, your commentary,
your personal OT sharing and your presence.
Even if you do not share a lot, just check in and say hi.
Lurkers are welcome to become posters!


Deplorably wonderful this week

The first couple enroute to MAL for Easter Weekend 4-18-19

President DonaldTrump welcomes participants in the WWP Soldier Ride 4-11-19

A Day of Golf – well deserved with good people. 4-20-19

First Couple Easter worship in Florida. 4-21-19

President meets with Twitter Reps regarding their platform. Solemn faces. 4-23-19

White House Easter Egg Roll 2019 – more pix at post #1

POTUS AND VPOTUS AT NRA LEADERSHIP FORUM. Indianapolis 4/26/19

FLOTUS Has a birthday!!!!

Keep the Truth coming Mr. President
Keep on Tweeting!

[Trump Girl Kit Cat]

OMG I was at the Dr. office yesterday and a patient there had just been to Porto’s bakery she made us all so HUNGRY showing pictures on her cell phone!!!

[STARLIT]

Tracybeanz
**
Mueller documented 10 incidents- in one ex POTUS called Mcghann at home and directed him to fire Mueller (I don’t think this happened). The report outlines efforts by Trump to influence witness testimony - pardons would be available if they stayed on message and on team.
***
NOW
POTUS publicly affirmed communication with Manafort about staying strong. Mueller report stated POTUS used inducements in an effort to get Cohen not to cooperate and then turned to attacking to undermine him (He did that pretty well himself IMO)
***
The report docs that legal conclusions were not drawn because witnesses refused to answer questions, numerous witnesses including Giuliani, Flynn, Sanders, Bannon, Kushner all stated they couldnt recall (PROJECTION)
***
(Barr is just sitting there staring at all this like....)The office cant rule out that the unavailable info wouldnt give more detail. Contrary to the conclusion the SC didn’t find evidence of collusion. A statement that the invest. did not establish facts does not mean no evidenc

[Rusty0604]

Lots of lies.

[djstex]

Hi and watching and following the thread. I noticed BARR SHUFFLES papers as windbag Feinstein is babbling on and on! LOL!The look on his face was priceless.

[Rusty0604]

I wouldn’t play poker with him if I couldn’t afford to lose.

[sweetiepiezer]

Have you ever been there?

[jennychase]

Phil Mattingly
@Phil_Mattingly

Sec. of State Mike Pompeo, on Fox Business, re: Venezuela: , “Military action is possible. If that’s what’s required, that’s what the United States will do...We would prefer a peaceful transition of government there, where Maduro leaves and a new election is held.”

[STARLIT]

Tracybeanz
**
Feinstein stating we need to hear from Mueller about report and March letter and senators should be able to ask about this directly. (They just can not let it go) Garaham has the letter and he is putting it in record.
***
Barr about to give OS- swearing in now. Barr: During confirmation, there were two concerns that dominated. Whether I would impede or whether he would make public the report. He finished as he saw fit, and even though I could keep confidential, I chose to release it.
***
I arrived at the dept on 2/14/19- said to Mueller, in preparing the report I asked that they identify 6E (GJ material) I wanted it identified so we could redact as quickly as possible. When I got to the dept I found that DAG and PAD were in regular discussion and (cont)
***
On 5/5 I met with Mueller. To get a readout on what his conclusions would be. At that meeting I reiterated that in order to do this rapidly, identify 6E plea.e On 5/22 I got the report, unfortunately it did not come with the 6E material redacted. It would take 3-4 weeks to ident
***
The DAG and I identified 4 cat. of info for redactions. (This is new- he is off his prepared opening statement) We went about redacting with the SC office, we needed their assistance. They were all carried out by DOJ and SC lawyers in consult with IC.
***
POTUS decided NOT to exert Executive Privilege. The public version has 10% redaction, vast bulk in Volume 1, Volume 2 has 2% redactions. 98% available to public. (he is back on script). Given limited nature of redactions, publicly released report allows americans to understand.
***

[sweetiepiezer]

Thank you NIKK, so great of you to do this.

[djstex]

Thanks.

[Freee-dame]

I turned my TV on to the hearing and turned it off after one minute of DiFi. Hardier people than I will watch her speak in such a phony sweet little wispy voice reading staff-written attack statements.

[sweetiepiezer]

Dr.’s office?
Are you ok?

[pax_et_bonum]

HTLM Sandbox Your easy guide to learning HTML.
Feel free to "practice" here on our thread.
  Challenge yourself to learn at least
  ONE new HTML skill each week.



STATES!
Hoosiermama is our state coordinator.

CONTACT INFO!
CottonBall is our Contact Information Coordinator.




Contact them by FReep Mail or here on thread
if you want to be on either list



PM DollyCali or post here on thread to be
added/removed from ping list





See y’all here!

Jeeves is back
and he stocked the tea cart for us!

MAGA

[Freee-dame]

Military action is possible.

NO! It is sad what is going on in Venezuela but it is none of our business. Bring our military home to stop the INVASION of our own country.

[STARLIT]

Tracybeanz
**
In Volume 1- IRA conducted a disinfo and social media op- 2, the GRU hacked into DNC and DCCC along with Podesta. SC investigated for conspiracy and coordination- concluded not enough evidence to establish any coordination. V2 - dealt with obstruction. He decided not to conclude.
***
We first heard he wouldn’t decided on obstruction on 5/5 meeting, we were surprised and asked for their reasoning and basis. Mueller stated 3X he was not saying But for the OLC opinion he would have found obstruction. Said those shouldn’t be abandoned in this case.
***
We pressed him on why no decision, he said they were still writing it. DAG and I decided we needed to reach a decision after assessing the evidence. I say this because the SC was appointed to do that as part of the DOJ. The powers he was using exist for that purpose-
***
It is a binary decision- we don’t conduct criminal investigations to put it out to the public. We felt the evidence was NOT sufficient to establish that no obstruction was committed- he needs to make the decision for the DOJ because the SC didn’t and it is their place.
***
We disagreed with a lot, and set them against the framework, and concluded that the evidence was NOT sufficient for obstruction. Report came in on 3/22 and it would take a while for report to be released, we needed to do something.
***
(Barr stating that the media basically caused a lot of issues especially former officials stating POTUS would be indicted) We used the language from the report to make the conclusions. (Barr arguing he is the DOJ so his decision is the decision of the SC)
***
Offered Mueller the ability to review, and he declined. On Thursday AM, I received a letter from Bob and I called him and said “What is the issue here. Are you suggesting this was inaccurate” he said No but that the press reporting was inaccurate and they were reading too much.
*******
Bob wanted more put out on issue of obstruction- argued to put out exec summaries written by his office and was very clear he was not suggesting that we had misrepresented his report. I told Bob I wasn’t interested in doing that or putting it out piece meal,
***
Following day Barr put out a letter stressing that the 5/24 was not a summary of the report but a statement of the principle conclusion. End.

[Freee-dame]

Thank you for watching the hearing and reporting to us.

[Trump Girl Kit Cat]

Oh I am fine, healthy as a healthy horse, I have an autoimmune disorder I am on medication for, so have to have bloodwork every 3 months because of the medication, other than that the Dr. would NEVER see my face!!! I feel so BLESSED at age 66 to be able to work full time and have NO HEALTH problems!!! Had breast cancer 10 years ago and I think the medication from the breast cancer caused the autoimmune disorder!!!

[sweetiepiezer]

BOOM, BOOM, BOOM, BOOM and BOOM!!!

[Rusty0604]

Special ops maybe. Brazil and Columbia would do most of what is necessary. I’d rather we protect our own back yard for people that don’t hate us because we’re not Muslims than go to the ME.

[STARLIT]

Tracybeanz
**
Graham: did mueller object to redactions? Barr: we worked together, few judgement calls as to whether or not something should be treated as a reputation as interest.
****************NIKK..my words...Graham is excellent!!!
**********
Tracybeanz
**
Any disagreement about 6E or classified? Barr: No. G: as to obstruction were you surprised he let you decide? B: Yes. I was surprised because it was his job. G: he can indict and indict a lot B: invest. Carried on as things added- why if you wouldn’t reach decision?
***
G: give reasoning for why it would be inappropriate to proceed forward on obstruction. B: obst. Has two aspects - usually an underlying criminality and there wasn’t one here. It isn’t necessary, but the people implicated take an inherently malignant act.
***
G: On firing Comey- (going through dem comments on that) Did you have issue with handling of MYE? B: yes. I said so at the time. I didn’t think firing him was obstruction. Report came to that conclusion as well. Reason for it was refusal to tell public what he was telling potus.
***
G: should we harden infrastructure? B: yes harden infrastructure. G: do you share concerns about Fisc and counterintelligence? Lack of professionalism with MYE? B: YES ON ALL.
***
Lots more yes and no here- affirming all we thought.
***
Feinstein: Trump directed Mcghann to fire Mueller and write a letter. Also to make repeated efforts to change his story- SC found substantial evidence that POTUS tried to change McGahan account to prevent further scrutiny. Does existing law prohibit efforts to get a witness lie?
***
Barr: yes, to lie to the government. I am not sure which they were referring to here- F: So, these things in effect constitute obstruction? B: We felt that episode, the government wouldn’t be able to prove obstruction. McGanns version of this is clear- the instruction said.
***
Go to RR and state that Mueller has a COI- The POTUS later said that what he meant was that the COI should be raised with RR and the decision should be left there. On the other end, McGan said he felt that POTUS was saying to use that to get Mueller out.
***
Something different between telling someone to fire and also get rid of for SC- press reporting was wrong and wanted it corrected- couldn’t prove that POTUS was instructing McGann to say something false, POTUS was aware that McGann had already spoken to Mueller-
***
(POTUS was trying to get them to correct media reporting— not obstruct) F: You still have a situation where POTUS tries to change lawyers account to stop further criticism. B: To be obstruction, the lie has to be tied to impairing the evidence. McGann had already given.