Q Anon: 02/06/19 Trust Trump's Plan

To: WildHighlander57

I just caught it after somebody else grabbed the decode above on this thread ;)

1,501 posted on 02/10/2019 9:10:15 PM PST by Steven W.

To: Cats Pajamas; ransomnote; greeneyes; bagster; generally; Wneighbor; mairdie; Swordmaker; ...

The brothers and sisters of the OWL know our blind spot is right in front of us and that is where they put their symbolism. We are the treasure and they have the map. We never see it coming.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

WOW!
Intriguing history of the development of Mr Green who considered honest people as marks, or “Coneys” or “Rabbits.” Your ancient historical and Shakespearian references were quite interesting as well.

Here’s hoping that the work you just did plus our own efforts together in the Qverse will start changing that, and that we will begin having much better vision for what is coming!

Your “Green” search brought to mind my own search and post on “Dink Green Mind” for drops #1994 and 1995. I lifted the research and dragged it over here from the efforts of someone on neonrevolt and then from reddit. The reddit inks are gone now, but the dig had to do with a song Q had posted as a response for a wedding song for an anon.

“An IrishAnon posted asking Q to choose a song he could dedicate to the Q team at his upcoming wedding. Q chose ‘Dink - Green Minds’.”

A character is named “Joe” in the song. The anon from reddit made the connection to Joe Biden, and that the song was calling him out:

Hey, hey, Joe, Joe
Whatcha know, whatcha know?
Hey, hey, Joe, Joe
Whatcha know, whatcha know?
Toke and toke
The smokin’ toke
Smokin’ Joe, he know
Smokin’ Joe, he know...”
Worlds Best 101 verifies that Joe Biden is indeed sometimes called “Smokin’ Joe.”

The Aussie reddit writer seemed to think that “Joe’s family being killed in in a car explosion..was actually mob hit..joe’s mob-owned now.”
[To be clear, this is BETH’s speculation - not texokie’s]

Continuing:

“...World’s Best 101 makes a very good case that that video from Q is conveying some VERY CRITICAL INFO!

Excerpt from the Part Two Update:

“Alright, so what’s the relevance of #1995? If you thought this was one of Q’s lighthearted posts to a newly engaged man, linking one of his favourite punk songs from his younger years – you are completely wrong. My analysis on my earlier post today about Q calling out Biden about Hillary’s emails is just the TIP of the iceberg about what message Q is sending to Biden in this post and what an absolute BOMB of a drop this was.

Have any of you heard of the OMNIBUS COUNTERTERRORISM ACT? Maybe, maybe not. Here’s some background on it. It was INTRODUCED BY NONE OTHER THAN SMOKIN’ JOE BIDEN ON BEHALF OF THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION ON FEBRUARY 10, 1995. THERE are some nice household names who sponsored the bill, too: Alfonse D’Amato, Dianne Feinstein, Robert Kerrey and Chuck Schumer are a few.”
[Caps in above quote are texokie’s]

[Note that the video is posted in #1995, with the “PAIN” emblem. WB101 continues with an in depth analysis of the OMNIBUS COUNTERTERRORISM ACT. ]

WB101 then concludes with this]:

[asterisks in the “F” word are texokie’s]

“If my theory is correct, this is Q’s biggest drop yet. By far. Not only was he saying ‘f**k you’ to Biden, he was saying an even bigger ‘f**k you’ to the WHOLE deep state. Q post 1995? Song from 1995? Lyrics directly refer to ‘Smokin’ Joe Biden’? Joe Biden passed a counterterrorism act in 1995?”

“Do you see where I’m getting at here?”

“If not, I’ll spell it out for you: pain is coming. The relevance of 1995 is that Q is referring to the act which Biden passed on behalf of Clinton, and it is this act – when all is said and done and all these sick people’s crimes are exposed – which will help bring down the exact people who passed it.”

“Peace and love from Australia.”
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
What Beth’s analysis is pointing to is how the VERY OMNIBUS ACT ITSELF is shaping up to be at least one of the petards upon which these miscreants are hoisted!

241 posted on 09/02/2018 4:41:07 PM PDT by TEXOKIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182

Cats, you also spoke of the “Bird Language.”

From Wiki

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_of_the_birds

“In mythology, medieval literature and occultism, the language of the birds is postulated as a mystical, perfect divine language, green language, adamic language, Enochian, angelic language or a mythical or magical language used by birds to communicate with the initiated....”
Fascinating. I had not heard of that before.

In an earlier dig, I examined the name “Huma.” I was unable to find that post in my files. I either did not collect it, or I lost it in my computer crash last spring.

At the time I wrote about her name, the sources I found -

http://www.ourbabynamer.com/meaning-of-Huma.html

- indicated that it meant “The name Huma is of Arabic origin.
The meaning of Huma is “bird who brings joy”.

Huma falls into the bird name category.

Your post about “Bird Language” made me think of that.
BUT LOOK WHAT I JUST FOUND!

http://quranicnames.com/huma/

According to this naming guide for Islamic women to use to pick out names for their children, “Huma” has THIS context and meaning:

“This is NOT a Quranic name, but Muslims can use it since it has a good or neutral meaning.”

“Meaning of Huma
According to some Arabic sources Huma is a Canaanite word meaning ‘fortress.’”

Quite a bit of difference between “Bird who brings joy” and “Fortress.”

1,502 posted on 02/10/2019 9:17:16 PM PST by TEXOKIE

2688

Q!!mG7VJxZNCI10 Feb 2019 - 9:05:09 PM

Anonymous10 Feb 2019 - 8:58:55 PM

Firefox_Screenshot_2019-02-11T04-58-03.280Z.png
>>5117410 Screenshot of Qanon.
Past 30 days.

>>5117543
>>5117590
You attack those you fear the most.
The sheer volume of attacks by the largest media corporations in the world, should, using common sense and logic, indicate there is something more to the story.
Q

1,503 posted on 02/10/2019 9:21:47 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)

To: Disestablishmentarian

***Sometimes I think Q might be reading the FReeQ thread***

I know once he/she nearly quoted a post of mine verbatim including a graphic. I do suspect that, if so, it was because my post included a link to a graphic in one of Q's earlier postings... I presume such a link could be traced.

1,504 posted on 02/10/2019 9:22:44 PM PST by Bob Ireland (The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise)

To: TEXOKIE; All

For what it’s worth I’ve had two or three wink of the eye, nose rubs this weekend from Trump supporters. People are SICK OF IT and they’re PISSED!

1,505 posted on 02/10/2019 9:23:44 PM PST by ichabod1 (He's a vindictive SOB but he's *our* vindictive SOB.)

that’s quite a burst of “Q” posts this weekend!

1,506 posted on 02/10/2019 9:27:06 PM PST by Steven W.

(How do we call “notable” on FR thread?)

Bagster has volunteered to indicate what's notable, hence The Oracle.

1,507 posted on 02/10/2019 9:29:40 PM PST by AZLiberty (218 House seats or bust! Bust. But the Dems will be busted for election fraud.)

that’s quite a burst of “Q” posts this weekend!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The Q drops seem like a chant, “Wake up!” “Wake up!” “They lose when you Wake Up!”

~~~ Not just red pilling, but exercising the will of the people, our will, against those who would rule us, in order to crush us.

1,508 posted on 02/10/2019 9:31:03 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)

To: AZLiberty; KitJ; bagster; TEXOKIE; ransomnote; Steven W.; Bob Ireland; Disestablishmentarian

1,509 posted on 02/10/2019 9:34:44 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)

To: KitJ; ransomnote; Cats Pajamas; greeneyes; bagster; generally; Wneighbor; mairdie; Swordmaker; ...

2/10/2019, 10:57:22 PM · 1,492 of 1,505
KitJ to TEXOKIE
You bring up an interesting point about law clerks voting for Ruthie.

Recall how much noise the dems made about Whitaker not being confirmed by the Senate.

Those law clerks aren’t confirmed either.

What goes around...

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Now THERE’S a good point. Those law clerks weren’t vetted either!...as a comparison to the appointment of temp Whittaker. That certainly COULD be a basis for talking points galore.

But there IS a distinction:

Whittaker, while perhaps not “vetted,” at least is operating openly in the office, with a recognized authority to do so whether the dems want to recognize that or not.

The law clerks, equally unvetted ARE NOT OPERATING OPENLY with recognized authority as even SC Temp Justices. (I know - there isn’t such - and that is the point) THEY ARE INSTEAD USING THE OFFICE OF RBG SECRETLY IN HER NAME TO SUBMIT COURT FINDINGS.

If this is happening, John Roberts is complicit.

How do we find out if this in fact happening?

#ProofOfLife

1,510 posted on 02/10/2019 9:36:12 PM PST by TEXOKIE

Before arguing over abortion, it might be more useful to first redpill someone about the corruption of Planned Parenthood. This investigative report is quite the eye opener:

https://archives-energycommerce.house.gov/sites/republicans.energycommerce.house.gov/files/documents/Select_Investigative_Panel_Final_Report.pdf

1,511 posted on 02/10/2019 9:36:32 PM PST by Melian (Check yourself before you KeK yourself. ~ Melian)

To: haffast; KitJ

OH THAT’S a MEME RIGHT ON THE MONEY!

“You wanna find RBG?”
“Follow her law clerks”

What you wanna bet that is actually happening?

#SomeoneKnowsWhat’sGoingOn

1,512 posted on 02/10/2019 9:38:26 PM PST by TEXOKIE

For what it’s worth I’ve had two or three wink of the eye, nose rubs this weekend from Trump supporters. People are SICK OF IT and they’re PISSED!

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

It does appear that we are indeed in the Great Awakening.... and people are waking up!

1,513 posted on 02/10/2019 9:40:17 PM PST by TEXOKIE

To: grey_whiskers

***https://imgur.com/a/zJRLD ... Alexa...***

Definitely brings a grin. 😁

1,514 posted on 02/10/2019 9:42:06 PM PST by Bob Ireland (The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise)

To: TEXOKIE; haffast

I think Melania could bring a ‘get well’ bouquet over to Ruthie. You know, just to see how she’s doing.

1,515 posted on 02/10/2019 9:43:26 PM PST by KitJ (Shall not be infringed...)

We don’t wear yellow vests because we don’t have a socialist government yet that has forced us all to have the stupid things manufactured by some frog merchantilist crony.

1,516 posted on 02/10/2019 9:43:50 PM PST by AndyJackson

1,517 posted on 02/10/2019 9:47:20 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion

Very detailed article.

Trump to Redirect Money to Enhance Congress Wall Funding, Chief of Staff Says

https://www.theepochtimes.com/trump-to-redirect-money-to-enhance-congress-wall-funding-chief-of-staff-says_2796212.html

President Donald Trump plans to supplement any border wall funding agreed upon by Congress with monies from other areas of the budget to get to his goal of reinforcing the southern border with a physical barrier, Acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney said Feb. 10.

“We’ll take as much money as you can give us and then we will go off and find the money someplace else, legally, in order to secure that southern barrier, but this is going to get built with or without Congress,’” Mulvaney told Fox News.

Congress has formed a bipartisan conference committee to negotiate on border security funding in exchange for Trump’s agreement to end the partial government shutdown, which ran for a record 35 days until Jan. 25.

The negotiators—nine Democrats and eight Republicans form both the Senate and the House of Representatives—have generally agreed some border barrier funding is in order, though the dollar amounts they’ve mentioned to media came nowhere near the $5.7 billion Trump wanted.

Mulvaney said he’s heard of offers from zero to $2.6 billion.

A deal must be reached and a funding bill passed by Feb. 15, or nearly a quarter of the government will shut down again.

Though Mulvaney maintained, as Trump said previously, that the border wall will get done even with no money from Congress, he didn’t go as far as saying that Trump will sign any bill the committee produces.

“He cannot sign everything they put in front of him. There’d be some things that simply we couldn’t agree to. So the government shutdown is technically still on the table,” he said.

In exchange for the wall funding, Trump has offered several measures friendly to Democrats’ priorities, including a temporary protection for certain illegal immigrants who came to the county as minors.

But the Democrat negotiators have brought conditions of their own, including limiting the immigration authorities’ detention capacity.

Trump has wanted to enhance the capacity, since keeping illegal border crossers detained prevents the “catch-and-release” scenario, where an illegal immigrant is apprehended and then released while waiting for a hearing in the extremely overburdened immigration courts, which can take years.

The committee negotiations have stalled on the detention issue, said Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Richard Shelby (R-Ala.), one of the main negotiators, on Feb. 10.

“I’m hoping we can get off the dime later today or in the morning because time is ticking away,” he told Fox News.

One of the Democrat negotiators, Sen. Jon Tester of Montana, dodged a question on why his partisans would want smaller detention capacities, focusing instead on the wall funding level.

“Until we get a final number, I’m not sure we’re doing any of that,” he told Fox News.

Without Congress

Mulvaney, who also serves as the head of the Office of Management and Budget, said there are multiple avenues Trump could take to reallocate money that Congress appropriated for other purposes and use it to fund the wall instead.

Despite objections from some Republican lawmakers, Mulvaney said Trump keeps the option to declare a national emergency “absolutely on the table”, which would give the President additional powers to redirect funding.

However, it’s not the only way, he said.

“There are certain funds of money he can get to without declaring a national emergency and other funds he [can] only get to after declaring national emergency,” he said without giving a breakdown, though saying “the whole pot is well north of $5.7 billion.”

Presidents have declared dozens of national emergencies over the past several decades, yet Democrats and left-leaning activists would likely challenge Trump in courts if he were to use the emergency powers for construction of the border wall.

Trump has already sent thousands of troops to the border to reinforce existing barriers with concertina wire and provide further support to Border Patrol.

Crisis

Trump has been calling the situation at the border a crisis since before his election, just as Obama did in 2014. Lately, Trump has pointed to the rapidly increasing number of illegal crossings since the migrant caravans started storming the border in recent months, along with drug and human trafficking.

While border security officials have acknowledged the wall is not a panacea for all the problems, they agree that certain parts of the border need new barriers, while others need the existing barriers repaired or upgraded.

Using border security funds from last year’s budget, Trump recently gave out a contract to build some 115 miles of new barriers, he said.

1,518 posted on 02/10/2019 9:47:38 PM PST by little jeremiah (When we do not punish evildoers we are ripping the foundations of justice from future generations)

To: grey_whiskers

Now I know how to turn Alexa off!

1,519 posted on 02/10/2019 9:56:57 PM PST by TEXOKIE

To: KitJ; haffast

I think Melania could bring a ‘get well’ bouquet over to Ruthie. You know, just to see how she’s doing.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Oh yeah!! That would do it! Think she will?

1,520 posted on 02/10/2019 9:58:15 PM PST by TEXOKIE

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794