Vol.#101
12-11-18

Q POSTS HERE
Terrorism, Yellow Vests, Trump trickery, and Stormy gets shlonged. It was a diverse news day. Let's see what stories the Oracle is following.

The Oracle would like to thank all those who took the time to congratulate this puplication on its 100th edition anniversary.

And now, the Oracle is pleased to announce the TEXOKIE inspired PERSON OF THE YEAR awards.
Time Magazine, being an inconsequential and derp state propaganda rag, is useless, so in order to identify the ACTUAL person of the year, the Oracle will take over.
Here are the rules. Any FReeQ, lurker, or interested party may submit to the Oracle, via private FReepmail, his or her nomination. Nominations may be anybody in the known universe. They must be from the human species. Nothing gay like "Oppressed Journalists" or "The Trans Community", please.
At the end of a three day nomination process, the Oracle will use the top ten nominees and his discretion and announce a list of (10) nominees. Then, a five day voting period will commence, again by private FReepmail.
There will be a second award. This one for the FREEQ OF THE YEAR.
The same rules will apply. I will pick the top ten nominated FReeQs for the final vote.
The nomination process will commence upon publication of this Oracle. All interested parties may submit nominations for both PERSON of the year and FREEQ of the year to Bagster via FReepmail.
Ready, set, smoke a cigarrette.
p.s. One more rule.
Nobody is allowed to get their butt hurt during this process.

Limerick Guy's (hillarynot) latest submission;
The Ballad of FOX News.
(exerpt)
The panels have lost their appeal
At one time they were a big deal
Their bias is deep, they all act like sheep
Because of their anti Trump zeal

Remember Stormy Daniels, the porn hooker?
Haffast-Stormy Daniels ordered to pay President Trump $292G in legal fees
Guess who gets the last laugh?
Now, let's see what Q has been up to.

#2579
POTUS Will Use the Military to Complete the Wall (Q Proof)
twitter.com/realDonaldTrump
trump-threatens-to-have-military-build-border-wall-if-pelosi-schumer-wont-budge
Anons already knew that…
Q
Q reposts the one thanking Soros for funding the "caravan" invasion, making it possible to couch the border as a NATIONAL SECURITY issue. It also explains how the President has certain powers in the case of NATIONAL SECURITY. Like protecting the border (building a border wall).
The Trump tweet;
....People do not yet realize how much of the Wall, including really effective renovation, has already been built. If the Democrats do not give us the votes to secure our Country, the Military will build the remaining sections of the Wall. They know how important it is!
(excerpt from article at 2nd link)
President Trump threatened Tuesday to have the military “build the remaining sections” of the U.S.-Mexico border wall, appearing to revive a call to use Pentagon money to finish the project ahead of a meeting with congressional Democratic leaders opposed to the president’s funding request.
Q points out that we (and anons) have known about this option for some time now. Thank you, Q.

#2580
The White House Echoes Q "Border Security is National Security" (Q Proof)
Anon posts;
twitter.com/WhiteHouse
Q lets this stand without comment.
The link is to a Kelly-Anne video where she talks about the border wall.
"The (Derpocrats) have a choice to make. Do they want to keep the government open or do they want to keep the borders open".

#2581
Nate Cain, Whistleblower, Exposed for Safety; FBI "Intrusion" Lawsuit Will Reveal CF Evidence
Q reposts #2578 from yesterday, which talked about the reasons for the "whistleblower" FBI raid.
He then posts this;
U-S-Attorney-Motion-Opposing-DCNF-Request-to-Unseal-FBI-Raid-Documents
Read carefully.
Why is the 'CLINTON FOUNDATION' back in the news?
NAMES OF WHISTLEBLOWERS BEING LEAKED OR PUT OUT FOR STRATEGIC REASONS?
NORMALLY, A WHISTLEBLOWER IS PROTECTED AND SHIELDED FROM ALL NON ESSENTIALS (CLAS).
How do you protect a valuable witness (whistleblower)?
How do you protect the chain of custody of evidence?
Name IDEN Public > FBI 'intrusion' > Lawsuit > Response to Lawsuit > Public Reveal (otherwise sealed?)
Moves & Countermoves.
Q
Q wants us to read the link carefully. This is it's title.
U.S. Attorney Motion Opposing DCNF Request to Unseal FBI Raid Documents, December 7, 20128
And this is at the link;
The Daily Caller requested that the Federal court unseal information on the warrant authorizing the raid on the protected whistleblower. The court refused, citing the on-going criminal investigation into the Clinton Foundation.
Q asks,
How do you protect a valuable witness (whistleblower)?
How do you protect the chain of custody of evidence?
Then he answers his own questions;
Name IDEN Public > FBI 'intrusion' > Lawsuit > Response to Lawsuit > Public Reveal (otherwise sealed?)
By naming the whistleblower publically, and have the FBI "intrude" and collect the original evidence, then respond to a lawsuit, the details of which can be publically revealed (and have been/we are reading about it).
Thanks, Daily Caller.
Move, counter-move?
Here are some further reporting on this post.
From AMorePerfectUnion;
Brian Cates
@drawandstrike
13 hours ago, 8 tweets, 2 min read Read on Twitter
Nice of the Daily Caller to bury the lede:
the US Attorney in charge of the investigation into the Clinton Foundation just revealed there's a grand jury seated and having a case presented to it.
QOVFEFE™
More on the Clinton Foundation criminal investigation;
bitt-Three Clinton Foundation Whistleblowers To Testify About Tax Crimes, Pay-For-Play
(excerpt)
Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC), Chairman of the House Freedom Caucus, told Fox News's Martha MacCallum on Monday night that there are three whistleblowers who have spent the past two years investigating the Clinton Foundation, and have "explosive" allegations which they will share during Thursday testimony on Capitol Hill.
Two years, eh?
That sneaky Keebler elf.

#2582
Military Spending Bill Included Funding for the Wall (Q Proof); D's Exposed as Anti-American
Anon posts;
Wow what a show!
President Trump on Tuesday engaged in an extraordinary argument with Democratic congressional leaders over his demand for border-wall funding, threatening a government shutdown if he does not get the money.
"I will be the one to shut it down," he told House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) at the White House.
During the contentious meeting in the Oval Office, Pelosi (D-Calif.) repeatedly asked Trump not to discuss the funding request in front of the news media.
"You will not win," Pelosi told Trump.
The exchange heightened the sense of drama surrounding government-funding stalemate between Trump and Democrats.
The meeting was scheduled to be closed to the press but the White House unexpectedly opened it to reporters just as Pelosi and Schumer were arriving at the White House. trump-democrats-battle-over-wall-in-oval-office-spat
Q responds;
"You will not win?" - Pelosi
You didn't think the largest MIL spending bill in history (FY 2019) wasn't going to [indirectly] include funding for the wall did you?
Learn the Constitution re: vested powers of POTUS re: matters of NAT SEC.
This was planned and forecasted as the 'border funding' solution from the beginning.
inthematrixxx/status
Anons had the proof long ago but shining a light back then would have defeated the primary purpose of showing the 'public' the real objective of D's (party of open borders/elim of ICE/elim of security/defend illegals over Americans _Midterm_elec).
These people are stupid.
Q
The anon links to an article on the White House meeting between the Donald and Pelosi/Shumer. He okeydoked them and invited the press, unbeknownst to the Derpocrats. They didn't much like having to speak of real issues in front of the press. The anon link has a partial video of the meeting. The part where the Donald shlongs Pelosi so hard, her plastic surgeon felt it.
Q oosts a link with the graphic he posted.
It outlines the whole "green castle", "red castle" mystery. Q goes on to explain that military funding of the wall was the plan all along, if the House failed to fund it.
Remember when we all were pissed off (not me) that the Donald signed that spending bill which gave the Derpocrats everything they wanted just so he could get the largest military spending EVER?
Hahahaha.
#TrustThePlan
Here is some further FReeQ reporting on this post.
Duchess47-Entire Trump/Pelos/Shumer Circus.
EMI guy had some thoughts on the subject;
Rush had some really good audio of the meeting between Trump, Pelosi and Chuck-U. First off, Trump punked those two by allowing the press to stay so that their deviousness was completely on record. And when those two d-bags started to get uppity, Trump said he'd shut 'er all down (the government) and be proud of it.
Trump's utterly defiant tone was barely masking his contempt for them, and I can't help thinking this same demeanor exhibited by Trump has been honed over many, may years of dealing with the trade unions in NYC. DJT took 'em to the woodshed.
Disestablishmentarian also had some thoughts;
WOW, WOW, WOW.
POTUS is soooooo awesome.
Everybody has to watch the video with CS and Nancy at the WH!
Schumer looked like he wanted to sink into his seat cushion and disappear. He looked like he knew perfectly well the President was pulverizing them politically, and that he will WIN AGAIN.
Rush Limbaugh's thoughts;
Mairdie-Pelosi/Shumer-No Brain Tied Behind Their Back.

#2583
Civilians Could Serve on Military Tribunals
abcnews.go.com/US/story
Think Graham KAV exchange.
Q
Link is to an article titled, "Civilians Could Serve on Military Tribunals"
(excerpt)
Pentagon lawyers designing historic military tribunals to try terrorists are poring over history books and legal tomes for guidance.
While U.S. law permits the executive branch to design the commissions with few restrictions, even with little regard to precedent, officials drafting the rules are reportedly keeping history in mind.
Q reminds us of the Kavanaugh (KAV) hearing, and Lindsey Grahams questioning of him on this subject.
Here is the Graham/Kavanaugh questioning. The video is teed up to the pertinent section.
Lindsey Graham Questions Kavanaugh.

#2584
A Sitting President Cannot Be Indicted; Impeachment Requires 2/3 Senate Vote (Not Happenning)
mark-levin-a-time-for-truth
Re: #5 Impeachment
Impeachment requires 2/3rd vote by the Senate.
Senate_Impeachment_Role
What are the odds of that?
YOU ARE WATCHING FAKE NEWS FAKE POLITICIANS FAKE HOLLYWOOD ALL PLAY TO THEIR 'DESTROY AMERICA' BASE.
#FactsMatter
Q
Here is the #5 from the Levin article that Q points to.
5. As for impeachment, NDAs involving wholly private matters occurring before the president was even a candidate and completely unrelated to his office cannot legitimately trigger the Constitution's impeachment clause. Indeed, they could not be more irrelevant.
The history of the clause and its “high crimes and misdemeanors” language make it crystal clear that the office and the president’s duties are not affected in any conceivable way by these earlier private contracts. Of course, Democratic Rep. Jerrold Nadler, another NYC radical, could not care less.
He’s more than thrilled to be an executioner in this French Revolution redux. The Constitution be damned. Meanwhile, he and the others wave around the Constitution as if they’re defending it against a tyrant. It is they who are the tyrants.
Q points out, rightly, that for an impeached President to be removed from office, the Senate (where the impeachment trial is held) must vote with a 2/3 majority to remove.
Not a likely scenario.
For bonus points, watch (again) Lindsey Graham question Brett Kavanaugh on indicting a sitting President.
Graham/Kavanaugh-Sitting President Cannot Be Indicted.

#2585
False Flag: French Government Behind Terrorist Attack in Attempt to Change the News Cycle?
How do you quell 'growing' protests against you?
suspect-in-strasbourg-shooting-identified-was-on-terror-watch-list
Notice a pattern?
Q
There was a terrorist mass shooting in France. The suspect turns out to be a Raggedy man, known jihadist, who was on a so-called "terrorist watch list".
As so often happens, the watchers "watched" as he killed innocent people.
Q's questions seems to suggest that the "watchers" either allowed this to happen, or directed it to happen in order to "quell growing protests" (#YellowVests).
Q further suggests that this follows the historical pattern as so often seen in the past, in both America and around the world.
Here is some excellent FReeQ reportage on the matter.
Little Jeremiah was hot on the case.
The “known criminal” was wanted for murder, cops went to his house earlier to get him, he was gone. Also attack is being designated “terrorist” attack, dude is moslem apparently.
He also escaped, supposedly, in a stolen taxi and cops didn’t know, were searching for him on foot.
Baysider- Fatal Shooting Near Christmas Market in Strasbourg Now Considered Terror Attack
(Video and photo of the Raggedy man at link)
(excerpt)
Strasbourg, the home of the European Parliament, is on lockdown and streets around the city center are blocked off as police hunt for a shooter who opened fire near the city's famed Christmas market, which began in 1570 and is the oldest known Christmas market in Europe.
French press are reporting four dead and eleven injured in the shooting.
Little Jeremiah-More Details On The Situation.
(From the link)
There's the raggedy. There are more details at the link.
Here's an excellent post brought to us by TheConservativeParty (with assists by CJWolf and blu).
TheConservativeParty-Jihad and The Pattern.
(excerpt)
I considered Q’s question about patterns,and it occurred to me that the reason “they” always admit the latest attacker was on the list, yet was free as a bird to kill innocents, is the deep staters have these terrorists on tap to do false flag attacks when they want them, and also can act horrified and respond to the attack, and after some time they say oh yes he was indeed a terrorist (not Amish) and on the list.
In doing so the state hides well their evil deeds against the citizens. They pretend to be horrified with us when in reality the controlling powers of “the state” are instigating attacks as they want them.
TheConservtiveParty seems to have nailed it.
And on a related note, two passenger planes hit the twin towers on 9-11.
Little Jeremiah filed this report;
Alexandros Koronakis France has raised its attack threat level to the highest possible: 'Attack Emergency' after the #Strasbourg attacks. Instant News Alerts ‏
#BREAKING: The death toll rises to 4. Reports that police searched his apartment this morning with an arrest warrant and he wasn't there, grenades were found. #Strasbourg #France
#UsingJihadForProphet
#GetIt?

#2586
It's All Coming Out: Clinton Foundation, Fake Dossier, FISA Abuse, Uranium One, Sealed Indictments
twitter.com/filthy_liberals
What a coincidence.
Q
At the link, a portion of Hannity's interview with Sara Carter and John Solomon.
Sara Carter-Lots of sealed indictments, Sean. Lots of sealed indictments.
Hannity- I have very good sources. You guys do too.
Haha. Lemme guess.

#2587
Google Downfall: Did Google Already Give DragonFly Search Engine to China?
Anon posts this;
Breaking: Fire breaks out in Raycom Info Tech Park, which houses Google’s office, in the Zhongguancun technology hub in Beijing, China.
PMBreakingNews
To which Q responds;
google-ceo-says-no-plans-to-launch-dragonfly-chinese-search-engine
Google CEO Says No Plan to ‘Launch’ Censored Search Engine in China"
How do you cover your tracks?
Start a FIRE.
GOOG says NO PLAN TO LAUNCH…….
What if GOOG already gave access to China?
CHINA launch?
WILL CHINA BE ANNOUNCING A STATE-FUNDED & STATE-MADE NEW SEARCH ENGINE IN THE COMING MONTHS?
The FIRE that brought down GOOGLE.
Q
Tha anon link is to the tweet he quoted regarding the fire.
Q's link is to an article titled, "Google CEO Says No Plan to ‘Launch’ Censored Search Engine in China".
(excerpt)
In a hearing with the House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, Google CEO Sundar Pichai kept saying the company has no plans right now to launch a search product in China. But that response leaves plenty of room to launch when it does want to.
Q seems to be suggesting that the Google CEO was less than truthful to Congress, and that this search engine may have already been given to China, and that China will roll it out as if they invented it themselves, as a STATE-FUNDED & STATE-MADE NEW SEARCH ENGINE.
Q further suggests that this fire was, in some way, Google or China or both "covering their tracks" and that it would be bad for Google.
There wasn't a lot of discussion or reportage on this series of Google/China tweets.
#FlyingByTheSeatOfMyOraclePantaloons

#2588
Examine Google's Upcoming 10-Q Financial Statements and Follow the Money
Q reposts his last, regarding Google/China/Fire, then this;
GOOG (upcoming) financial statements should receive extra scrutiny [10-Q].
Follow the money.
Help will be provided.
Q
Q provides help with the following of the money in his next post, and the Oracle expects he will "help" when Google files it's next Q-10 report.
bitt helps decipher;
bitt-LisaMeiCrowley/What is Q-10 and more.
(excerpt)
A form 10-Q is quarterly rpt mandated by US federal Securities & Exchange Commission, to be filed by publicly traded corporations.
I’m betting when Google files their 10-Q we’ll see some interesting connections.
And mo posed this question;
Mebbe Dragonfly tech has been used by Google in USA for a year or two already?

#2589
Google Executives Dumping Shares
twitter.com/maga_swaga
What a coincidence.
Q
Q links to the tweet he got the graphic from, which shows that the Google CEO and other (execs of the company) sold large amounts of Google Stock in the recent past.
Q calls that a coincidence in light of this fire, and perhaps the CEO's Congressional testimony, and the Dragonfly search engine thing.
Please don't ask meto explain. My understanding of this one is tenuous, if at all.
ssschevwas helpful in reading this graphic;
Quick scan and Pichai Sundar (Google CEO) sold ~20mil in shares in two days. Is he a rabbit?
One person tweeted on the linked twitter thread;
Without question. Defrauding investors.

See you in the funny papers.

What will the coming days bring. Huber coming up (D13). Stay tuned.
We are the Mouth of America.
Not all can hear our voice, but more do every day.
Can you hear us?
Will you join in our crusade?
The adventure continues tomorrow, sportsfans. See ya ‘round the popsicle stand. Same Q time. Same Q channel.
Bagster

You have good random thoughts.

Bagster

Can you post POTUS’s latest tweet? Trolling at it’s finest!

"How's about a juicy helping of this, TranspareNancy?"

🤣

You have created the perfect post.

p.s. Stole your gif.

Bagster

😃

A tribunal IS a three judge panel.

Bags, the Richard-Headed Trolls are in deep panic mode. Every one of their posts bring joy and mirth to my soul.

Yep.

They are comic relief now.

#Gilligans

Bagster

Re: the Q memo: Would be great to print and post on bulletin boards - don’t know if they have them everywhere but here almost every grocery store, feed store, office, etc., has a place to put up notices.

I didn’t watch it, but those topics were mentioned as being in the CobWebb video.

I watched parts of a few over a year ago and decide the guy is a scam artist who puts a few truths in and then mixes it up with speculation and worse. Then I succumbed and watched one a while ago; the title made it seem as though Gina Haspel was in it. Nope, misleading; CobWebb was waiting for Haspel someplace and her name was the hook. The entire video was total balderdash and thankfully short so not that much time was wasted.

Maybe not just anons. That Q drop sounds as though help will be provided to those who can bring Goog down.

What meaning do you get from this?

Akkkk. I'm about fidna fall out my chair right about now. I can't look up all those posts. I'll try to look at it tomorrow. In the meantime, I hope somebody with more energy will try to cipher it. It looks very intedesting.

Keep on that one, it looks promising.

#SorryMate

Bagster

Propane?

I cook on propane. Not quite as portable as that.

Aha, the NY Slimes. Very hard to believe that nugget, yeah?

You can really see why she was Miss Oil & Lube 1952 or whatever. I think that’s the regular Speaker’s gavel. The question was why she was taking it OUT of the house.

Picture does not look like Huma?

No way is that Huma.

Face is not long enough.

#BagsterFacialRecognitionSoftwareActivated

Bagster

But a military tribunal can have a judge, singular with jury of Officers, no jurors multiple judges (Nuremberg). Flexible setup. The 3 judge panel is for hearing appeals/reviewing verdict/sentence. Or the whole thing can be a military commission like the CF that 0 ran in Gitmo. Like to think the President’s would be more effective and efficient.

Comes with fitting for 2# canister and converter for 20# tank.
I’m not interested in its portability...I want a Waffle House in my backyard!

Can you post POTUS’s latest tweet? Trolling at it’s finest!

_______

This one?

The Democrats and President Obama gave Iran 150 Billion Dollars and got nothing, but they can’t give 5 Billion Dollars for National Security and a Wall?

4:50 AM - 12 Dec 2018

Many Gigantic ThanQyous for the new Oracle. Love the new EU insignia, more truthful.

Sitting on different sides in one shot, Nancy wearing pantsuit in one shot, McConnell and Ryan present. Second set just the four of them - Trump, Pence, Schumer, and Pelosi. Ties different. Stock photo.