Posted on 08/08/2018 10:35:40 PM PDT by ransomnote
“Trust The Plan”
YouTube President Trump This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected (The Plan) - 6 min
YouTube Joe Masepoes Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction
YouTube Thoughts Not Bots Who is Q - 4 min - quick overview
Paul Serran What is Q? - 31 point introduction
Threadreader ImperatorRex A thread on how Team Trump is preparing the normies for what is coming: major Swamp Draining. - overview
Article Sundance Imagine You are Not a Politician, Yet You are Running For The Presidency - overview
Threadreader Jason Wright Q Anon Is Real - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary
“Pay Attention” Thread Qmap.pub Q drops - created by Q, searchable by date or drop number
Website We-go-all.net Q drops and research - includes extensive resources and links
Website qntmpkts.keybase.pub Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
“The Truth Is Spreading” Thread Anonymous QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump Oracles Bagster Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread Lexicon Swordmaker LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference “Power to the People” YouTube Praying Medic Series of videos explaining Q-drops Praying Medic Immediate reactions to Q-drops YouTube Dustin Nemos Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent documentation links ImperatorRex Includes Q-drop reactions Thread SkyPilot Story of Q - collection of Q information “Silent Majority No More”
Website White House Email the White House with your support and suggestions Website Congress Email Congress with your support and suggestions Website roserambles.org Q Cards Thread Little Jeremiah Memes “Fight, Fight, Fight!” YouTube President Reagan A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images YouTube President Kennedy The President and the Press - 20 min - 1961 speech on secret societies
Have long wondered the same thing. I suspect it has to do with the post being presented by the system and a glitch in that process vs what a poster does but I’m really to ignorant to know. BTW, you have FREEPMAIL.
Also if you were wondering if Strzok III is also in the CIA as well as FBI and SES answer is pretty much "yes".
https://truepundit.com/troubling-questions-emerge-about-fbi-chief-strzoks-collusion-with-cia-father-worked-in-africa-for-companies-linked-to-funded-by-cia-operations/
Embattled FBI Agent Peter Strzok, embroiled in the spying and wiretapping scandal of President Trump, grew up in Africa for a stint while his father worked for companies that have long been linked as operational and funding cut-outs for the Central Intelligence Agency, according to records.
Now, as the spying and wiretapping scandal of the FBI has implicated former CIA Director John Brennan and Barack Obamas CIA, questions have emerged about the FBI Strzoks connections to the CIA. And that of his family too. The Inspector General is probing many facets of FBI corruption, along with House and Senate committees. That includes CIA involvement in the FBI spying scandals. And Strzoks alleged role as a clandestine liaison between FBI and CIA.
True Pundit reported Brennans involvement in Sept. 2017 and now nine months later others are asking questions about the FBIs involvement with the CIA with what amounts to an apparent clandestine operation to unseat President Trump or make sure he was never elected in the first place.
()HERE IT IS BELOW: DOCUMENTATION THAT STRZOK IS CIA!!
The FBIs Strzok bragged in internal FBI text messages about __obtaining a CIA coin__ often awarded for meritorious service to intelligence agents from and personally signed by former CIA Director John Brennan in 2017.
Now Strzok is accused of working with CIA cut-out Stefan Halper to set traps for Trump associates.
How did Strzok know John Brennan and what was his involvement with FBI operations linked to Trump campaign skullduggery? FBI and CIA operations are separated for a reason.
Q
Unfortunately, that sort of thinking is irrelevant to people like Brennan, Strzok (père et fils) and a cast of thousands.
Moreover, they know that nobody in this country - be they fedgov, media, masses - has the stomach to punish them as they should be punished for their perfidy. Their smirking arrogance is hard to take, but not hard to understand.
Mr. niteowl77
Good morning, FReeQs!
I was thinking about newbies asking questions. They show up and ask things like “when will HRC be arrested?” or “where is Assange?” and want answers.
Sometimes we “know” the answer. I “know” that Sessions is a white hat, not only because Q says “Trust Sessions” but also because of evidence that one can see when one’s eyes are open and looking for it. (Example: the “coincidence” of Sessions being in Little Rock to talk about school security, then planeloads of evidence boxes flying out of Little Rock shortly after.) Is it possible that Sessions is either a black hat or a dud? Yes. But not very probably in my mind.
Sometimes we disagree and argue about the answer. Mueller and Rosenstein - white, black, gray hats? Or some other color?!
I think the arguments and disagreements are IMPORTANT! It’s what separates us from the MSM which dispenses the “correct” views and answers to the waiting and gullible sheeple.
Should we argue until we reach a consensus? NO! It’s nice to know what the consensus is. It’s nice to hash things out, but let’s not try to force everyone into lock step agreement. As long as people are not posting lies, and as long as people are not making personal attacks on other posters, let’s encourage disagreement and argument. (Consensus is how we got “climate change”.)
I hope I will lay out my case for questions like “when will HRC be arrested” without trying to force others to agree with me and without taking it personally when they don’t. (Yeah, I will agree to disagree on some things. No fag. as *someone* here would call me for saying “agree to disagree”.) I hope I will persuade people with my arguments and evidence, but I hope I will NOT browbeat them into going along with my view.
Q is trying to teach us to argue with facts and to entertain possibilities. But even Q is not the be-all, end-all authority on everything. We need to always think for ourselves. And isn’t that the point?
Back on the road again so will not have a lot of time to keep up and will have limited access to data so the Oracle will be the one 1st place I will check.
After hitting "Post Reply" highlight name in "To" box on top and hit delete.
Good post!
; people like nellie ohr not even in the government anymore attorney Lisa page, and various other low level employees involved to actually do the dirty work like Michael Steinbach John Glacalone Randy Coleman Trisha Anderson Kevin Clinesmith Tashina Gauhar Sally Moyer
In the article I included about the Obama holdovers that refused to hang trumps portraits it said this:
No visit to the swamp would be complete without paddling into the Civil Rights Division at the Justice Department where the anti-Trump swamp creatures and Obama holdovers occupy an entire layer of political control.
Underneath any assistant attorney general at DOJ, there are multiple deputy assistant attorneys general, or DAAGS. These DAAGS control the day-to-day information flow, management oversight of large individual sections, such as voting, and are in positions of incredible power. Like rebecca bond
And lastly RB is at the the end of the doj stringer in the Q post she could have just been one of the go betweens for the tarmac meeting
[DOJ [LL][SY][BO-CS(UK)][DL][PS][DL][JC][MM][RB]]←→[BC]*
Also note the asterisk
*Tarmac (final meeting - no charges/drop = supreme court) *Go-Between(s) (meetings 1-4)
now there may be a better RB From doj that fits I haven't seen it anywhere I think you are off base on this one and i'll remind you you didn't believe me about in Q tel at first either :^)
The two cooperate substantially, part of tearing down the various "walls of separation" that were blamed in part for the government not picking up on the 9/11 plot, or picking up but not acting.
Excellent points and well-stated, generally. I can’t disagree with anything you have said.
:) You were my inspiration.
Cooperate, yes... but checks and balances are apparently relics of a remote and risible past. Collusion is another matter, though like vote fraud and censorship, it is only bad if someone other than leftists do it.
I dug up names of McCabe and other close to Comey, based on Comey's answers to Feinstein where he gave titles instead of names. I knew every one of those people (Comey's inner circle) was likely a rat, so was expecting certain names to surface - Rybicki, Baker, McCabe. Same process works just viewing deeper in the chain of command.
COMEY: As I said in response to Senator Feinstein's question, deputy director, my chief of staff, general counsel, the deputy director's chief counsel, and then, more often than not, the number three person at the FBI, who is the associate deputy director, and then, quite often, the head of the national security branch.Deputy Director = Andrew McCabe
http://heavy.com/news/2017/06/jim-rybick-fbi-chief-of-staff-biography-james-comey/ Reportedly Told Comey That He Doesn't Fully Trust Jeff Sessions
General Counsel = James Baker
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/6/7/15751336/fbi-trump-russia-comey-trump-flynn Names McCabe, Rybicki, and Baker as confidantes
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/06/3-fbi-officials-can-support-comeys-account-of-trump-meeting.html All four of them had reservations about doing so because they did not fully trust Attorney General Jeff Sessions -- and because the events were unprecedented in their experience.
Deputy Director's Chief Counsel =
Associate Deputy Director = David L. Bowdich
Head of National Security Branch = Carl Ghattas as of Feb 28, 2017
Next time, I may need to add “IBBBF!”
Went to bed early. Did I miss the Viking kitties?
RN, there should be an unwritten rule about pinning JR and zotz.
I think the recent Neon was posted before. Just got to it. Wowzer. Pedo stuff. Links from article/comments have some dark bunny holes that can’t be unseen. Please God rid us of the evil in our midst.
NOW THEY ALL LOSE! #NewQ #QAnon #GreatAwakening
August 10, 2018 by Neon Revolt
https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/08/10/now-they-all-lose-newq-qanon-greatawakening/
But there has got to be more to it if Q is emphasizing this now. I am thinking that she had to have attempted something really egregious rather that being a little too aggressive with her tactics.
In the Al Smith speech, Trump asks how corrupt one has to be to be fired from the Watergate team. Maybe, even then, she was trying to sell access to her influence.
I like imagining that scenario.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.