Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Q Anon: 6/24/18 FRiendly FReeper Collaboration to understand Q drops
qanon.pub ^ | 6/24/2018 | FReepers, vanity

Posted on 06/24/2018 12:01:53 AM PDT by ransomnote

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?"

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

Who is Q - video available on Youtube

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.

If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following Youtube link to a good source for concise reviewes of Q drops, Praying Medic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos

Praying Medic also has a a Twitter account:
https://twitter.com/prayingmedic

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub

QProofs provide evidence that Q Anon is a legitimate source of information, has access to President Trump, and is serving President Trump's agenda:
https://www.qproofs.com/home.html

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronyms to help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:

http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

Need a meme to help red-pill your friends and neighbors? Little Jeremiah has posted a thread and continues to invite us to post memes we find in one conveneient FR thread. Here's the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3648238/posts?page=297

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected:
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the following link to send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump



TOPICS: Conspiracy; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: pefodileses; q; qanon; qay; qidiots; qtarded
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,161-1,1801,181-1,2001,201-1,220 ... 1,941-1,959 next last
To: bagster
Some have taken it to the next level - source could also mean the source - SR - i.e. witness protection program. However, I think, in this case, you're right, WL compromised and JA is in check. In either scenario JA is in play. I've also seen some refs in context with a server and some unsourced anon saying a WL server was handed off to a friendly third party for transfer / exchange. The wildest speculation I've seen is that the "source" is ... Kim Dotcom. I thought, "I HOPE NOT!" LOL ;)
1,181 posted on 06/26/2018 10:28:45 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1174 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

Will do. Many thanks!


1,182 posted on 06/26/2018 10:29:48 PM PDT by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1149 | View Replies]

To: generally

1,183 posted on 06/26/2018 10:34:20 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1182 | View Replies]

To: No_Doll_i
Anon on reddit: "Coms don’t fail in commercial aircraft. Have source with JetBlue. This was called in 775. Hostage. I’m not f-ing kidding. Don’t ask."
1,184 posted on 06/26/2018 10:38:17 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1180 | View Replies]

To: No_Doll_i

LOL - resident and adoption manager Carlos Castillo


1,185 posted on 06/26/2018 10:39:49 PM PDT by eldoradude (Try believing your lying eyes for a change...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1180 | View Replies]

To: No_Doll_i
Access to cockpit.
Frame of shot.
Expand your thinking.
Q

Keep in mind, FReeQs, while pondering upon all these different plane pics, that Q has recently said that more proofs were coming including shots from inside Marine and Air Force One.

It would suck if some of these pics were that and the others were related to the averted false flag event of today (theory).

Anyway. Expand your thinking.

Bagster

1,186 posted on 06/26/2018 10:42:57 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1117 | View Replies]

To: eldoradude

Yep that’s the name I saw earlier in the day. I was going to post it until I saw the date on the article. I’ll see if I can find it again but that was MANY breads ago.


1,187 posted on 06/26/2018 10:43:15 PM PDT by No_Doll_i
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1185 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

Yikes, I am gonna ask tho! Or at least search.... Not seeing that on 8chan but I could have missed that bread.


1,188 posted on 06/26/2018 10:44:50 PM PDT by No_Doll_i
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1184 | View Replies]

To: Bob Ireland
I actually worked that show once or twice... old CBS's W 57th Street theater, if memory serves.

No kidding. Me and my friends used to run home form school in fifth grade to watch it.

Man, looking at it now, it sure was some cheesy S. Bob, you are AWESOME! Autograph please.

Bagster

1,189 posted on 06/26/2018 10:46:07 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1125 | View Replies]

To: No_Doll_i
Here's a cbs link from 6/21/2018 -

https://cbslocal.com/2018/06/21/carlos-castillo-accused-of-having-child-pornography/

1,190 posted on 06/26/2018 10:51:19 PM PDT by eldoradude (Try believing your lying eyes for a change...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1187 | View Replies]

To: No_Doll_i

okay, figure it all out, you all- I’m off to bed.. :)

stay off trains and buses!


1,191 posted on 06/26/2018 10:55:21 PM PDT by bitt (t\\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1188 | View Replies]

To: mairdie

Actually that is an assault consummated by a battery. An assault only requires the victim to perceive harm. Consummation of a battery is the physical contact. Ah naval Junior officer legal school...even these 30 years later some things just stick with ya...


1,192 posted on 06/26/2018 10:57:51 PM PDT by reed13k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1133 | View Replies]

To: reed13k
only requires the victim to perceive harm.

Coupled with an attempt to harm, yes?

(picking nits)

Bagster

1,193 posted on 06/26/2018 11:02:25 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1192 | View Replies]

To: No_Doll_i
Here's some more on Creepy Carlos -

http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?kh=-1&uddg=http%3A%2F%2Fdcfs.co.la.ca.us%2FPolicy%2FFYI%2F2006%2FFYI0646AdoptivePlacementinMexico.doc

This is an fyi on adoptive placements of DCFS supervised children in Mexico who are U.S. citizens or residents.

Looks like Los Angeles County has been sending American kids to Mexico to be adopted since 2006 at least. I thought it usually went the other direction, Mexico to US.

1,194 posted on 06/26/2018 11:04:00 PM PDT by eldoradude (Try believing your lying eyes for a change...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1190 | View Replies]

To: All
Photos from Q Drops 1597 & 1598

Q Photo Dig Results from Q Cockpit is Take off From Shanghi Pudong

nternational Airport, CHINA

Location from plane window Nearest to CAOZHEN, CHINA

Airport is Circled in Red

Q Photo Marked in Blue What does it all mean? I don't know yet.

1,195 posted on 06/26/2018 11:04:02 PM PDT by No_Doll_i
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1189 | View Replies]

To: bagster
SFO>JFK
A321
Direct

Is there any other possible meaning for "direct" other than "direct flight from San Fran to JFK?"

Bagster

1,196 posted on 06/26/2018 11:06:16 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1193 | View Replies]

To: No_Doll_i
Well, in that case, No Doll. Maybe they are photos form Air Force One? I don't see how they would be related to today's Jet Blue incident.

Bagster

1,197 posted on 06/26/2018 11:08:27 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1195 | View Replies]

To: No_Doll_i
Didn't a Shanghai airport come up in the discussion of the photos with the big E in it?

Or am I confusing that with something else?

And didn't we think at the time it had something to do with Snowden?

Still, it could be one of Q's proofs taken from Air Force One? Whaddya think?

Bagster

1,198 posted on 06/26/2018 11:12:06 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1195 | View Replies]

To: bagster

perceived attempt to harm. IE if someone swings at you but misses that is still an assault. The victim perceives the intent. It is the prosecution that must prove however that there was the perception of harm due to the attempt.

Intent is not required for assault though that would come into play in an attempted assault which frankly is a rare charge since the victim would not perceive it but someone else would. What most people hear of when they think of attempted assault is actually attempted battery which is an actual assault...swing and a miss.


1,199 posted on 06/26/2018 11:14:14 PM PDT by reed13k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1193 | View Replies]

To: eldoradude

yep that is the same story I saw earlier... don’t know why the dates are different.

SCUMDOG

There is also a story out there somewhere about the Center for Missing Children and some very bad people associated with it.

DAMN is anyone looking out for kids at this point???


1,200 posted on 06/26/2018 11:14:23 PM PDT by No_Doll_i
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1194 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,161-1,1801,181-1,2001,201-1,220 ... 1,941-1,959 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson