Q Anon: FRiendly FReeper Collaboration to understand Q drops

qanon.pub ^ | 6/11/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[grey_whiskers]

Yeah, but there's plenty wrong with trolling, and then lying about it with a sickly sweet "Who? ME?" when called out on it.

While pretending you are being honest and sincerely skeptical.

Keep plucking those chickens.

[No_Doll_i]

There are so many people conspiring with so many other people right now it’s hard to keep them all straight.

ANYTHING is possible at this time. Now we wait to see what falls out of which tree.

Q: We have everything, now comes the pain!

[grey_whiskers]

The 'i' missing in missile was a reference to the Iridium satellites being used for guidance, being neutralized.

The 'p' missing means someone took a pee. Like the trolls are trying to do all over this thread. :-D

[AllAmericanGirl44]

I think you picked up a lil Hillary along the way!
And yet ‘he persists’. Seems you are waiting for someone to come and take you by the hand to a secret location and show you the plan.

You like Q, you don’t like Q, I’m getting dizzy trying to follow all your posts.

[No_Doll_i]

OK so let me get this straight, while we are here TRYING to discuss 20+ Q drops, you are here with your stupid longass post trying to convince anyone who will listen that you are relevant.

I guess you are not getting the memo, MOST OF US DO NOT CARE WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY ANYMORE.

Got it? Good.....

[bagster]

But even our own resident Guru of Q, Bagster, seems to acknowledge that there was such a prediction. In post #454 he says (AND I QUOTE:)

Now I'm the "resident guru of Q?" I detect a bit of attitude, Jack. You do know I took the name Lesser Oracle because it was given to me by another anti-Q troll in the same manner you just called me the Guru of Q. Or maybe you didn't know that.

Also, me saying Q was "pointing at" something is not the same as Q "predicting" something. Like you say, just about all dates and predictions are interpretations based on "pointings." Like I said, the 11th was interpreted as significant because of the OIG report being released. Then after that changed, like the anon says, some gave it new significance because of Assange.

People like you then grab onto those dates and when nothing earth shattering happens, use it to debunk Q, as if HE said something specific would happen on a specific date.

I'm glad you have reverted to Q debunker rather than pretending to contribute. That game was pretty transparent, given your history, I have to say. And those obnoxious html tables of yours, goot lawd. Have we seen the last of them at least?

I wonder if I should name myself the "Resident Guru of Q" or not. Hmmmm…

Bagster

[Publius]

How about the “Wizard of Q”?

[CJ Wolf]

Resident Quru should cover it.

[bagster]

SING = Singapore, just as US

Oh, derp. I shoulda figured that one out. ThankQ Miss blu.

Bagster

[bagster]

Ya, that's it.

I miss the easy ones. :(

Bagster

[reed13k]

Well the F-23 was a Northrop Grumman fighter called the Black Widow which supposedly never moved forward losing out to the F-22. Might have been compromised or so good it was kept under wraps. Two protos built for the testing (Black Widow II and Grey Ghost). Supposedly really stealthy.

Then of course there is the MIG-23 Flogger which is kinda dated.

Was looking for an experimental X-23 of some type but couldn’t find anything.

Can’t think of any ships/missles/torpedoes/etc that have -23

Maybe a rocket - anyone know?

[Disestablishmentarian]

Where is [RR]?
What country specifically?
Why?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

CANADA

Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein Delivers Remarks at the International Economic Forum of the Americas Conference of Montreal
Montreal,
Canada
~ Monday, June 11, 2018

[bagster]

The 'p' missing means someone took a pee. Like the trolls are trying to do all over this thread. :-D

Haha. Good find.

You weaponized autist, you.

Bagster

[No_Doll_i]

Oh Mr Wizard, can you please ask Q to take a break for an hour so I can shower and make myself some dinner?

[Jack Black]

ME (previously): If history is a guide, no amount of broken predictions will convince most of the true believers that their faith is misplaced.

ME: (now) This was a general statement about the nature of true belief. I do feel that examples, like the one I gave of the failed prophecies of various 19th century preachers, are apropos. Sorry if that cuts a little too close to the bone for comfort, Bagster.

BAGSTER: (in italics) Cause we're ignorant sheep and cultists Jack?

I don't say that. Right now I think the most rational position is waiting. Only time will tell if people's faith in Q was misplaced or not. But even if Q is debunked in some sort of comprehensive way, I am sure that some people will keep on believing. People here have admitted that this is a religious belief for them.

Not enlightened beings like you, Jack?

Ha, ha, ha, ha ha. Look in the mirror, Bagster. You are the one who claimed to be "the lesser oracle", not me. You are the one who bragged only a few posts ago that "My powers are vast and beyond your comprehension. :) (OK, I note the smiley face, so I will take it as sarcastic --in part.)

Of course I don't claim to have any special knowledge! That's the entire theme of my writing on these threads.

Have you come among us to show us the way, Jack?

Hardly. In fact I've asked a you, as my main protagonist here, a few simple questions. I posted them on the previous thread, and I posted them on this thread. But still, no answers.

That is, of course, your choice. You are under no obligation to do so. However it does not bode well for your sincerity. You prefer to toss out rude littel asides and you keep on with ad-hominum attacks. In a formal debate, points are deducted for attacking the speaker and not the topic. This isn't a formal debate, I realize, but I try to maintain my principles.

A review of the last 50 or so posts will show that I take considerable time to answer any question or criticism sincrely put forward to me. For the most part I try to ignore mere insults, but on occasion I have fallen short of my goals on that.

My next set of questions will be addressed to the thread at large.

Perhaps there are others who are pilgrims on the journey who will take a sincere interest in communicating in good-faith about the questions which seem self-evident to me, and not just smashing me around for not being a part of the in-group of true believers.

Postscript: Someone did say: see what happens if Q is injected in a non-Q thread. I did see some quite rude responses on a non-Q thread to someone posting stuff, when I went to look.

So, the problem goes both ways.

I am trying to act a bridge, not a roadblock, to understanding. Starting with MY OWN.

Cheers!

[aMorePerfectUnion]

.

QOVFEFE™

[buffaloguy]

Can anyone find out the date of the Seth Rich picture from the metadata?

[No_Doll_i]

Yeah he is hanging out with Lynn Rothschild up there today, she was the chair of that forum.... go figure....

[aMorePerfectUnion]

.

QOVFEFE™

[aMorePerfectUnion]

.

QOVFEFE™