Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FRistory: What If In History ...
4-8-18 | Eagles Field

Posted on 04/08/2018 7:30:03 AM PDT by Eagles Field

It’s 1864, The South has won the Civil War. How does this change the pages of history?


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Chit/Chat; History; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: civilwar; history; slavery
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
To: Eagles Field

Spike Lee has a movie like this.

CSA. Watch it. It’s kinda funny. Of course it paints all white people as horrible animals, but it’s target audience has no problem doing that.

At the end, they play the racist commercials. It’s very ey opening and should be watched by younger folks.


21 posted on 04/08/2018 8:22:34 AM PDT by Celerity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Field

With no United States to intervene, Germany wins the First World War. Having seized all the colonial possessions of a beaten France, and some significant ones from Britain, such as India and much of Africa and China, they become the world empire they desired. By the 1930s they have bought enough prestige that most of Latin America is essentially German protectorates, and a controlling majority in the corrupt Yankee United States Congress is permanently in the Kaiser’s pocket. Since they bought a lot of their oil from Texas, the German Empire signed a mutual defense treaty with the Confederate States around 1924. Pax Germania reigns for about a century, when a dispute over the succession sets the world ablaze.


22 posted on 04/08/2018 8:32:12 AM PDT by GenXteacher (You have chosen dishonor to avoid war; you shall have war also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GenXteacher

Well at least there would have been no Hitler.


23 posted on 04/08/2018 8:33:24 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Field
We'd be tearing down statues of Grant and Sherman?

-PJ

24 posted on 04/08/2018 8:40:06 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Field
I've gamed this out in my own way.

Imagine that George McLellan, a Democrat, wins the Presidential election through voter fraud (realistic so far, eh?).

He declares an immediate cessation to the war, and withdraws all Union troops to the pre-war Union states. Both sides remain bitter over the war, and especially the South, since the war has been fought primarily on their soil and has caused immense destruction, even by the end of 1864.

Many in the North press for resumption of the war, and private militias are raised for the purpose of harassing the South. The South, nearly broke and trying to rebuild its economy, has no one willing to lend it money to do so (think of the Marshall Plan after WW II). Weakened economically and militarily (which are the same thing, really), it becomes embroiled in multiple defensive actions against the British, who never got over losing their colonies, and who still want cheap Southern cotton for their mills, the Mexicans, who want Texas back, and the Northern private militias.

The South eventually falls, and is split into multiple countries by whomever happened to control the fragments of the territory at the time. This would lead to multiple countries existing in what is now the Continental US, all of them in conflict.

Skipping ahead to WW I, the remaining "US" never enters WW I because it is too small in population and resources to fight in that war, and because of the ongoing conflicts on its own continent. The Germans, in their last push of the war, over run the French / British, and claim a large part of France (primarily Alsace Lorraine) as theirs. Hitler never emerges, and all of Europe eventually fights united against Stalin, but with a much smaller, weaker Soviet Union confined to its own territory (Russia).

Of course, I've left out a few details. :-)

25 posted on 04/08/2018 8:40:38 AM PDT by Hardastarboard (Three most annoying words on the internet - "Watch the Video")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Field

There would have been a second war within 50 years. Slavery was on the out due to public opinion and technology, so that issue would have been resolved, but foreign interests would have swayed both sides. Each side was far too weak to resist foreign influences.


26 posted on 04/08/2018 8:42:21 AM PDT by CodeToad (The Democrats haven't been this pissed off since the Republiverycans took their slaves away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Field

The South wins the Civil War. What about the wars that would follow? Would they continue to beat the United States?


27 posted on 04/08/2018 9:12:44 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
What if the North conceded defeat after First Bull Run.

I don't know how plausible it was but losing is losing regardless of how long the war lasted. The losing side would be bitter about it.

28 posted on 04/08/2018 9:24:49 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
I'd say it's more likely that the U.S. would have ended up a lot like Canada today -- a weak (on a global scale), loosely unified country where much more power is vested in the provincial/state governments.

The U.S. or the Confederacy. Having rebelled, allegedly about "state's rights" how long would they have put up with orders from Richmond?

29 posted on 04/08/2018 9:26:17 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: eclecticEel
The aristocratic plantation society wouldn’t survive, and would probably collapse within a generation; after which the USA/CSA would reunite.

What on earth would have compelled the to reunite? What would it have taken for the U.S. to reunite with Great Britain after having won our independence?

30 posted on 04/08/2018 9:28:04 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hardastarboard
He declares an immediate cessation to the war, and withdraws all Union troops to the pre-war Union states. Both sides remain bitter over the war, and especially the South, since the war has been fought primarily on their soil and has caused immense destruction, even by the end of 1864.

McClellan would have taken office in March 1865. Do you really think the U.S. would have surrendered given where the war was at that time?

31 posted on 04/08/2018 9:30:26 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Field
It’s 1864, The South has won the Civil War. How does this change the pages of history?

Germans win World War I. No World War II. No Nuclear bombs. Most of the killing in the 20th century doesn't happen.

32 posted on 04/08/2018 9:32:17 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
The country splits into two parts, neither of which can resist the aspiration of foreign powers. The South eventually becomes part of Mexico, and the North once again comes under control of Great Britain.

Southern Confederacy eventually acquires the border states, the territorial states, and eventually acquires the rest of the Union. Charleston becomes the major center of Finance for the Nation instead of New York.

33 posted on 04/08/2018 9:34:31 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
I doubt we would have been up to taking on the Rome-Berlin-Tokyo Axis.

It wouldn't have occurred, because the USA would not have intervened in World War I, and Germany would have won it. Hitler would have never came to power.

Why would the USA not intervene in WWI? Because as two different countries, it wouldn't have had the military might that it possessed in our time line, and would have been much more shy about getting involved in such a conflict.

No USA intervention, No Hitler coming to power.

34 posted on 04/08/2018 9:37:49 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
I'd say it's more likely that the U.S. would have ended up a lot like Canada today -- a weak (on a global scale), loosely unified country where much more power is vested in the provincial/state governments.

I believe this scenario would have persisted for awhile, (long enough to keep us out of WWI) but I predict the Southern Confederacy would have first acquired all the border states, and over time, the territories and eventually the rest of what remained of the United States.

35 posted on 04/08/2018 9:40:34 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dsrtsage
I think the social pressure against slavery would have continued to build, and eventually it would sweep through the South in the same manner it did the North, albeit more slowly.

I believe someone had invented a mechanical cotton picker around 1870 or so.

36 posted on 04/08/2018 9:43:36 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: eclecticEel
The aristocratic plantation society wouldn’t survive, and would probably collapse within a generation; after which the USA/CSA would reunite. The ascension of American as the leading industrial nation would probably be delayed.\

I think this is a good prediction, though I think the USA would have melted into the CSA.

37 posted on 04/08/2018 9:45:55 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GenXteacher

Not all that unreasonable, thought I think you let Germany get farther than they would have.


38 posted on 04/08/2018 9:48:24 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad
I think the South would have quickly acquired the border states, (H3ll, they were nearly half confederate during the war) and the South would have quickly started acquiring wealth and population. The territorial states would have found themselves more economically dependent upon the CSA states, and would have eventually fallen into it's political orbit as well.
39 posted on 04/08/2018 9:52:06 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

When the five border states joined them, Yes. The Northern states would no longer pose a military threat to them.


40 posted on 04/08/2018 9:53:26 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson