Posted on 03/19/2018 8:25:54 AM PDT by Rebelbase
There’s a lot of evidence mounting that solar cycle 25 will usher in a new grand solar minimum. Since about October 2005, when the sun’s magnetic activity went into a sharp fall, solar activity has been markedly lower, with solar cycle 24 being the lowest in over 100 years.
Interplanetary magnetic field – Image from NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center
Solar cycle 24 – Image from NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center
Daily observations of the number of sunspots since 1 January 1900 according to Solar Influences Data Analysis Center (SIDC). The thin blue line indicates the daily sunspot number, while the dark blue line indicates the running annual average. The recent low sunspot activity is clearly reflected in the recent low values for the total solar irradiance. Data source: WDC-SILSO, Royal Observatory of Belgium, Brussels. Last day shown: 28 February 2018. Last diagram update: 1 March 2018. (Credit climate4you.com)
Meteorologist Paul Dorian at Vencore weather writes:
"All indications are that the upcoming solar minimum which is expected to begin in 2019 may be even quieter than the last one which was the deepest in nearly a century."
Some scientists are even saying that we are on the cusp of a new grand solar minimum, and the upcoming cycle 25 may have even lower cycles after it.
"This empirical modeling of solar recurrent patterns has also provided a consequent multi-millennial-scale experimental forecast, suggesting a solar decreasing trend toward Grand (Super) Minimum conditions for the upcoming period, AD2050–2250 (AD 3750–4450)."
Simon Constable, in Forbes writes:
The question is whether we will enter another grand solar minimum just like the Maunder minimum which, if history is a guide, would mean a period of much colder weather winters and summers.
Once upon a time, people would worship the sun as a deity. It was with good reason that they did so for the sun provided much of what sustains life on our small planet, warmth and bountiful harvests. How would we survive if the sun stopped beating down on us? It was a real fear.
Then came science and industrialization. As the new era took over, we mostly forgot the sun and its importance to our existence. (Of course, most people occasionally complain that it is either too sunny or not sunny enough.)
But just because we stopped paying close attention doesn’t mean that it lost any of its importance to our world. And neither does the fact that the life of the sun is far more complex than many people realize. Indeed, if we are to believe the experts,the sun’s behavior is about to change in a way that could have dramatic consequences for the food we eat and the broader economy.
That’s why it is rather handy that an important book on the matter was recently published in paperback. Nature’s Third Cycle: A Story of Sunspots by Arnab Rai Choudhuri.
The third cycle is that of the Sun and the dark spots which appear on the solar surface. The first two cycles are day versus night and the changing seasons.
Choudhuri gives us a condensed history of the study of the sun and of sunspots over the past few centuries back to Galileo Gailiei, whose discovery of the Sun’s 27-day rotation marked the serious start of solar physics.
The remarkable tale includes skilled amateurs as well as professional academics, the rivalries between the main players, and a probable husband-wife murder-suicide thrown into the mix. Yes, there is a lot in the story of studying the sun, and the author does a masterful job of making it a fascinating read. Not too shabby when many scientific books do more to muddle the reader than to enlighten.
The names which might be familiar include the following: space observatory pioneer George Ellery Hale; discoverer of Uranus William Herschel; and astronomer Edward Maunder. It was the last of those men who identified a period from about 1640 through 1715 when the spots on the Sun disappeared. Usually, the number of dark blemishes on the solar surface tends to rise and fall in somewhat predictable 11-year cycles.
The period when the spots vanished, a so-called grand solar minimum, also coincided with a sort of mini-ice age with harsh winters and short cool summers. It became known as the Maunder minimum after the man who studied it.
Of course, the idea that the temperature of the earth could be changed by mysterious fluctuating dark patterns on the sun’s surface is nothing if not controversial. But that doesn’t mean it isn’t true, as the author states:
"[…] the earth indeed becomes cooler when sunspots go missing. Exactly how this happens is still a question on which experts seem to have very differing views and which is unlikely to be settled definitively in the near future."
Choudhuri takes pains to add that none of this negates the effect of industrialization on climate change. They are both critical factors.
However, the whole matter is complicated by the fact that while the world was warming up in the 20th century the number of sunspots were above their average count. Remember, other things being equal, more spots means warmer earth temperatures.
When the book was published in hardback in 2015, the author was reluctant to forecast the likely outcome of the current sunspot cycle.
But what has become more apparent based on more recent research from NASA is that we are now in a period of very few or no sunspots. This has coincided with the brutal winter we are going through now.
The question is whether we will enter another grand solar minimum just like the Maunder minimum which if history is a guide would mean a period of much colder weather winters and summers. More than a few experts with whom I speak regularly believe that we shall enter such a grand minimum along with the resulting bone-chilling weather.
If that happens, then there will be profound influences on the economy, including possible crop failures and rising energy use for home and workplace heating. Or in other words, expect bigger bills for food and energy. After a period in which the supply of both has been increasingly abundant then this change will likely come as a shock to many people and likely the broader global economy as well.
I remember reading years ago somewhere in some obscure history book, that Kentucky, back during the civil war—around 1862 or so—not only experiencing pretty big battles and chaos, but to add to the misery, at least one killing frost during during the spring and summer growing months. Making produce difficult to harvest. Much less having any production at all.
Wonder if this related to a similar sun cycle (assuming this book was correct)?
Ping.
Fortunately, the solution for Global Cooling happens to be exactly the same as the solution for Global Warming — more communism!! [/s]
The Sun is the biggest influence on the planet’s temperature. If the Sun cools, you can expect a cooling on Earth.
The world was beginning to come out of the Maunder Minimum, and the Little Ice Age, during the Civil War period. I think the coldest years were the 1840 - 1855 period.
Here they go again, scientists that is, trying to predict the “future”. They can’t accurately predict tomorrow’s weather.
Like the disclaimer you always hear in stock ads, “past performance is not a predictor of future results”.
THEY ARE GUESSING!
It’s fun, and scientists need something to do, but I’ll believe it when I see it.
Just to keep you all in the information loop for springtime seed selection and crop planning .
If you believe in global cooling, you might want to get seed for more tolerant conditions,
or plan on selecting crops which don't require as much time until maturity or productivity.
Hybrids are grown for productivity and for market; Heirlooms are grown for consistency and proven viability in various adverse conditions.
Many of us have already diversified crops, and many have already sown seed indoors for spring transplanting.
This is just an alert to keep you informed in your planning and planting future.
Better start increasing carbon footprints.
Crazy talk. Expect a visit by the Hallucinogenic Al Gore Re-Indoctrination Department, aka "HAGRID"...
You can also stock garden seed for one zone colder but since your garden is a yearly thing you don't have to do as much preplanning.
Your trees will be in the ground for at least two years, if you are planting saplings, before you see any results. Five is more realistic. Nut and fruit trees with a fish pond (don't forget the cattails and wild rice) is the easiest and quietest way to have food.
Some years back I ran a thread hereabouts where I was tracking the sun’s weather this way.
I was calling the new minimum the Gore-Hansen Minimum.
It seemed suitable somehow.
Have some Chicago Fig trees in the basement to protect them. Will plant in June. The cherry trees planted 2 years ago are rated to -40F. December 2016 saw -27F in my backyard.
Houston, We Have A Problem.....
The only warm place to be is UNDERGROUND!!!!
Other than colonizing space, we need to colonize UNDERGROUND!
Hey, over here.......
Ping-a-ling.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
