Q Anon: (3/18/18) Continued from Friday's thread. FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

we-go-all.com/# ^ | 3/18/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

Anons, Tweeters, FReepers and others are still digging in the right place, and still willing to dig wherever Q points.

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3640290/posts

I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is under revision but may soon return to posting new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.

I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/

President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:

http://www.we-go-all.com/#

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3640290/posts?page=1307#1307

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

[bagster]

FReepers are mocking him as low IQ nut, racist, and anti-Semite.

I wonder about our own guys sometimes. I've made the point that the American public, and even our own brother/sister FReepers have been conditioned to jump to "conspiracy theory" about anything that is outside the box. It's a tactic of the left that is ingrained in us. It's tough to red pill yourself out of it. I used to be exactly that way my damn self, so I know.

Saying, "The Rothschilds control the weather" is WAY too simplistic, though, and does open yourself up to mockery by the simple minded. Something like that requires at least a paragraph or maybe even a short story rather than a quip. Ya know?

[Enlightened1]

Weather warfare is the use of weather modification techniques such as cloud seeding for military purposes.

Prior to the Environmental Modification Convention signed in Geneva in 1977, the United States used weather warfare in the Vietnam War. Under the auspices of the Air Weather Service, the United States’ Operation Popeye used cloud seeding over the Ho Chi Minh trail, increasing rainfall by an estimated thirty percent during 1967 and 1968. It was hoped that the increased rainfall would reduce the rate of infiltration down the trail.[1]

With much less success, the United States also dropped salt on the airbase during the siege of Khe Sanh in an attempt to reduce the fog that hindered air operations.[citation needed]

A research paper produced for the United States Air Force written in 1996 speculates about the future use of nanotechnology to produce “artificial weather”, clouds of microscopic computer particles all communicating with each other to form an intelligent fog that could be used for various purposes. “Artificial weather technologies do not currently exist. But as they are developed, the importance of their potential applications rises rapidly.” Weather modification technologies are described in an unclassified academic paper written by airforce officer-cadet students as “a force multiplier with tremendous power that could be exploited across the full spectrum of war-fighting environments.”[2]

The Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques (Geneva: 18 May 1977, Entered into force: 5 October 1978) prohibits “widespread, long-lasting or severe effects as the means of destruction, damage or injury”.[3] However, it has been argued[who?] that this permits “local, non-permanent changes”. In contrast, the “Consultative Committee of Experts” established in Article VIII of the Convention has stated in their “Understanding relating to Article II” that any use of environmental modification where this is done “as a means of destruction, damage or injury to another State Party, would be prohibited.”.[4] Furthermore, they conclude in the same paragraph that “military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques, would result, or could reasonably be expected to result, in widespread, long-lasting or severe destruction, damage or injury.”, meaning that all signatories are expected to abstain from using weather modification to cause harm at any scale. Importantly, the language of the treaty does not overtly condemn military use of weather modification when it does not directly cause harm,[4] such as the United States’ use of weather modification in the siege of Khe Sanh, discussed above. Because of the limitations of the treaty, and the fact that it applies only to signatory states, weather warfare is not a thing of the past, and may continue to play a role in warfare throughout the twenty-first century.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weather_warfare

[Enlightened1]

Here is another one for you on Geo Engineering.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/

[bagster]

Something like that requires at least a paragraph or maybe even a short story rather than a quip. Ya know?

See what I'm sayin'?

Hahahaha.

[Enlightened1]

This is old news. I have seen interviews of retired Air Force Generals talking about the U.S. using weather weapons in Vietnam.

They made it rain all the time on the Ho Chi Minh trail to make it hard for the communist to move their supplies and weapons into South Vietnam. It slowed them down and then we would hit them from the air with B-52s.

I find it astounding that so few people know about this. It was declassified in early 2000.

[defconw]

I hope so!

[Enlightened1]

It’s astounding to me how people do not know how to do basic research on the Internet. This stuff comes right up.

Yet they are so brainwashed by the FAKE STREAM NEWS they don’t believe the truth when it’s slapping in the face.

Anyhow, here this from the History Channel talking about weather weapons in Vietnam. You think it just ended there, and the military did not modernize their weapons from over 50 years ago???

Haha! S.M.H.

Here is the link,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cpr5JVWjIW4

[bagster]

They made it rain all the time on the Ho Chi Minh trail to make it hard for the communist to move their supplies

That explains the rain poor old Forrest Gump and Bubba had to endure.

Shoot...It even rained at night.

Seriously, though. I'd never heard that till these threads. But I believe it's physical possible and that they would do that.

[generally]

many thanks for the great posts on weather. and your other enlightening posts as well. :-)

[Enlightened1]

That’s right I forgot about Gump saying it rained all the time. Haha!

That was us using our weather weapons.

It’s real simple.

You just go to google and type, weather weapons and links come right up.

Type geo engineering and links come right up.

Do the same in Youtube, Twitter, etc...

That’s it, and just start checking out the different links that come right up. Operation Popeye is what the military called it in Vietnam.

[Enlightened1]

My pleasure.

[EMI_Guy]

Remember one of Max’s enemies known as Claw? An Asian villain?

“Nice to meet you, Mr. Smart. I am Craw.”

“And it’s nice to meet you, Craw.”

Asian guy: “I said CRAW! Not CRAW!

[USMC79to83]

Good Morning everyone!

Looking forward to the news this week...

[Calm_Cool_and_Elected]

ROFLOL! “Slip him a Mickey”. That phrase and quick sand from all the cartoons and sit coms of my youth!

[greeneyes]

Owning the weather in 2025 - Report by USAF in 1996.

http://csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf

I don’t know about the Rothschilds, but military has been on this for a while, so probably some abilities exist. Read an article the other day about Russian capability.

There was also an article around the time of some of the hurricanes, discussing how ability to influence the movement possibly exists.

Also, do a search on Geoengineering - should find some additional info as to what they have proposed and maybe what they are doing.

Keep in mind that what’s available from open source is likely behind what the actual capacity is - that’s classified.

[Enlightened1]

Here is the link to the Q Cards for anyone interested.

Click on the link on the left to get the different options.

The very first one QCards - (1 thru 120) take a while to download. I am on a 200m Internet connection, and it took a few minutes for all of them to come in.

https://genesis55.github.io/QCards/?card=FOR-$ALE#qcards-viewer

[EMI_Guy]

Is that the one where these guys were shooting at a 1/2” maple board at 400 yds with .22LR, and the bullet still went through?

[edzo4]

I believe the 3 Marines referred to are the ones surrounding Trump

https://taskandpurpose.com/marine-generals-taking-trumps-administration/

Marine Generals Are Taking Over Trump’s Administration

No fewer than three current and former four-star Marines will serve in top posts in Trump’s national security team.
The former commander of U.S. Southern Command, retired Marine Gen. John Kelly, has been selected to serve as the secretary of Homeland Security in the incoming Trump administration, according to CBS News. Now, no fewer than three current or former Marine four-star generals promise to be key members of Trump’s initial foreign policy team

http://www.businessinsider.com/trumps-marine-general-picks-iraq-war-2016-12

23, 2003, Maj. Gen. James Mattis pinned a star onto each collar of his assistant division commander, Col. John F. Kelly. He was now a brigadier general, and the first to be promoted on the battlefield since the Korean War.

Not far from there, another colonel in the unit named Joe Dunford was leading his regimental combat team.