Posted on 03/09/2018 12:57:47 AM PST by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3637830/posts
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following link:
http://qanonmap.github.io
Some people have difficulty accessing that Q drop page and prefer to use the following link:
http://www.we-go-all.com/
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3637271/posts?page=5#5
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
So how did ES (I am assuming Edward Snowden) respond “publicly”?
The researchers many of whom posted on FR, know the facts of his real life. Parents, place of birth, etc. None of the “autobiography” facts are real.
That, I have not seen yet!
Thanks! (Of course, qanonposts.com updated as soon as I put out that call for help. LOL)
Folks...
No, I’m thinking the twitter recieved was the message that was expected from Snowden to confirm his compliance with option a/b or c. But, the reference to a D is interesting.
An anon posted: Twatter in receivership in 24 days? Shut em down!
Q responded: >>605232
24hrs to respond.
He did, smartly.
Public view.
Q
This was after Q told @Snowde: Twitter rec 24D.
So something MAJOR is happening to Twitter.
If they are going in Receivership, then they are trying to hand onto a deck chair on the Titanic.
My guess?
Dorsey (Twitter) and Schmidt (Google) have been caught committing TREASON against America.
They have been working with foreign governments and the Deep State (Clowns) to take down Trump and the will of the American people, and more, they empowered corruption, and have been involved in corruption and sex crimes.
And the NSA and Trump has the goods on them.
This is not about twitter going into recievership folks...
bookmark
Snowden, did he tweet something?
I will do that. I know we cannot link to 8 chan here on FR.
I’ve read or skimmed many of them and I agree. Personally, I’m struck by his resemblance to the Indonesian cult leader who had a relationship with not only his mother, but that Hawaiian official. Fuddy? Or, at least, Fuddy was a member, IIRC.
However, the twists and turns within or a step removed from the myths,tell a parallel story of their own. Myths can be distorted reflections of reality.
Agreed, if you don't take the posts in CONTEXT it is sometimes hard to follow. Also, bear in mind, Anons make all kinds of guesses, sometimes they are correct, sometimes not.
When Q responds he is sometimes confirming, and sometimes correcting or clarifying.
I suspect that Q means the Snowden’s tweet was received.
:) Or never delete the President’s account.
ES was told he needed to respond via twitter in 24 hrs. It appeared to me, that he had 3 options; a/b or c... or whatever that REALLY means.
He apparently did respond via twitter and was commended for it. But, there was a D there, so perhaps when ES was given a choice between a/b or c, he responded for a request of D?
In the Q lexicon, ES = Eric Schmidt, ex-CEO of Alphabet/Google.
Some people grab conjecture from here and post it elsewhere. If what gets spread around is not accurate, it tends to reflect poorly on the overall effort.
Is that freeper ‘Darlin’, or your own personal ‘Darlin’?’
Maybe this was Snowden’s public answer. He retweeted Adam Banks tweet. Remember A,B or C
https://twitter.com/adambanksdotcom/status/972112647020826625
https://twitter.com/Snowden/status/972110541408952320
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.