Posted on 02/23/2018 12:05:00 AM PST by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633864/posts
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
I'm having trouble with the websites I normally access to check for Q drops. For now, Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at this link:
Note that Free Republic does not host links to 8 Chan so if you choose to share such links, please do so using "Private Reply" or FReepmail. Thank you.
You can locate my Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: A FReeper list of acronyms used in Q Anon "drops."
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one detailed post. His latest update is here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3633864/posts?page=15#15
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
I was thinking more of how it could benefit POTUS against the very fake news media. For example when they were all calling him crazy.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/how-anti-trump-psychiatrists-are-mobilizing-behind-the-twenty-fifth-amendment - The removal of Trump using the Twenty-fifth Amendment is the aim of a newly launched social movement composed of mental-health professionals. The group, called Duty to Warn, claims that Donald Trump “suffers from an incurable malignant narcissism that makes him incapable of carrying out his presidential duties and poses a danger to the nation.”
Which is very similar to when Barry Goldwater sued fact magazine and won:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldwater_v._Ginzburg - The court found that the evidence introduced at trial proved the defendants knew they were publishing defamatory statements and “were motivated by actual malice when they published the statements.”[2] The court found the defendants guilty of libel action based on the article Fact published. The plaintiff demanded $1,000,000 in compensatory and punitive damages but Senator Goldwater was awarded $1 in compensatory damages and $75,000 in punitive damages
This is the Fact article titled 1,189 psychiatrists say Goldwater is psychologically unfit to be president.
https://www.scribd.com/document/322479204/Fact-Magazine-Goldwater-1964
Trump has said he wishes US laws were more like the UK’s
http://money.cnn.com/2016/10/24/media/donald-trump-sue-news-organizations/
In the States, the publisher’s statement is essentially presumed true, because the plaintiff has the burden to prove it false. In a libel lawsuit in Britain, the statement is presumed false, and the burden is on the publisher to prove each material fact is substantially true.
So we’ll see I guess.
This is what’s interesting about Trump’s attorney’s lawsuit. Trump’s position as POTUS provides them shield but they have no such protection against Cohen & his name was mistakenly included in Steel “dossier”, etc., most likely because somebody said (spoke) the name “Cohn” and it was misinterpreted (possibly over a ham radio ... Ohr cough cough) - Cohen’s lawsuit is a potential goldmine of discovery!
This is what’s interesting about Trump’s attorney’s lawsuit. Trump’s position as POTUS provides them shield but they have no such protection against Cohen & his name was mistakenly included in Steel “dossier”, etc., most likely because somebody said (spoke) the name “Cohn” and it was misinterpreted (possibly over a ham radio ... Ohr cough cough) - Cohen’s lawsuit is a potential goldmine of discovery!
Please POTUS! Take them out!
Well! That is interesting! It’s only their right if they are actually a citizen! So glad I don’t live in a city!
Also I don't see any reports about any of that gear (helmet, face mask, body armor) being found anywhere on the site.
I also wonder how this fits in with the photos and video posted earlier in this thread on the large duffle bag being loaded into the white pickup truck.
https://twitter.com/MikeTokes/status/966011079384907776
Can't help but wonder if there is a connection, YMMV.
Depending on the drugs and brainwashing, he may not even remember.
Q Drop #799 is late to the game as far as "Deep Dream" is concerned, and therefore, so is your argument about Q not mentioning Jason Bourne together with the movie plot device "Deep Dream." I’m the author of the Q Lexicon and I assure you I do know what I am talking about. Both the name Jason Bourne and (Deep Dream) were deliberately cited together as the last line in Q Drops #165, and then for good measure, Q repeated the entire drop in #166:
165 Nov 20 2017 09:48:10 Q !ITPb.qbhqo ID: DmzzKPeaqbhqo
150212477
Expand your thinking.
What are patterns?
How are patterns formed and isolated?
What are data sets?
What is a map?
Re: Twitter (repeat)(important).
What action is Twitter taking effective mid-Dec?
What is the purpose of this action?
Possible test to understand public / gov’t response?
When was this announced?
When did events in SA transpire?
Who controlled a large portion of Twitter stock?
Why is this relevant?
Expand your thinking.
What is the real purpose of this action?
What is the SS?
Who is the primary person protected under the SS?
What action is Twitter taking effective mid-Dec?
Would POTUS be able to use Twitter post action?
Define the ‘known’ action.
Why is the MSM ignoring this action?
What transpired w/ POTUS’ Twitter account a short time ago?
Re-read crumbs on this topic (necessary).
Two scenarios (lose/lose).
POTUS advised by SS to terminate use of Twitter due to new website tracking policy (cookies) amongst other spyware not disclosed (risk) – 1st time they failed (re-read).
POTUS silenced on Twitter due to new policy (re: SS / risk).
Direct message failure.
POTUS refuses to be silenced.
Bad actors gather metadata and targeting.
Small example of the ongoing silent war.
Options?
Regulate?
Problem: time to complete.
Solution?
Patriots, get the word out.
Jason Bourne (Deep Dream).
Q
In this instance, "Jason Bourne", due to the specifics of the parenthetical comment (Deep Dream), it’s obvious that Q is literally pointing us not to the fictional character Jason Bourne but rather to the 2016 movie with that name and its plot, which has some eerie parallels to other social media companies. Q mentions Jason Bourne and Deep Dream in several later drops, always in close proximity to comments about bad actions from Twitter. Drop #165 was essentially concerned with both tracking Trump’s location and censoring him and conservative voices on Twitter.
So what are you suggesting?
Homerun, swordy. :)
The new Q Anon thread is located here:
Ok how about any other eyewitness that said he wore “body armor”
Just in time, time.
I saw it. Thought it odd, but the way kids talk anymore it is barely intelligible English and is sometimes difficult to decipher the actual meaning.
Question also is, if the shooter wore body armor, how could the teacher know it was Cruz? Maybe this is the second shooter that some have mentioned.
It’s possible Cruz was used as a scapegoat because it would have been the only “legal” way they could get him out of the school system (considering the school laws).
That is why before going down that rabbit hole I would like some other corroborating statement either from an Official Source, a media source (despite the inherent distrust in both as sources) or a second eyewitness, which if you are skeptical of the media and the officials you should be just as skeptical of a lone eyewitness.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/do-the-eyes-have-it/#
Why Science Tells Us Not to Rely on Eyewitness Accounts
Eyewitness testimony is fickle and, all too often, shockingly inaccurate...
Since the 1990s, when DNA testing was first introduced, Innocence Project researchers have reported that 73 percent of the 239 convictions overturned through DNA testing were based on eyewitness testimony. One third of these overturned cases rested on the testimony of two or more mistaken eyewitnesses. How could so many eyewitnesses be wrong?
I am so sorry I didn’t respond sooner but just seeing this. By all means make a new thread. I have been so busy lately I haven’t had much spare time to spend on FR. I have had time to watch videos while I do other things. ;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.