Posted on 01/22/2017 11:42:52 AM PST by bogusname
The Lying Corrupt Liberal MSM is showing fake photos of a sparse crowd at the Trump Inauguration. Here is a video with the real photo.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
He’s right.
THey can wear pussyhats and send Maddona out to drop F-bombs and swear and threaten to blow stuff up all they want to, and I hope they continue to do so for a long time to come. Because it didn’t work, and it will not work.
If they think they are going to win hearts and minds with aging pop singers talking about her V, it’s going to be hilarous to watch the death of liberalism.
“It looks like obama had more people in 2009, but not much more....”
Obama had all of the D.C. locals attending his Inauguration, as Wash. D.C. has a huge Black population, and “one of their own” had been elected. I can assure you, that the majority of the locals this time around did not show up to see Trump being elected.
Many of Trump’s supporters come from flyover country, and therefore it was not that easy for them to get to Wash. D.C. for the Inaugural. Add to that depleted money sources for middle class and Joe six-pack supporters of Trump because of 8 years of Obama’s monetary policies, and the fact that many people who actually work for a living couldn’t take off from work for the weekday Inaugural ceremonies (unlike the college students and welfare folks that constituted the majority of Obama’s supporters) the numbers that did turn out for Trump in the capitol were astounding.
Ah! I see that there are multiple links to the Google Gigapixel shot posted to this thread also. This media lie is GOIN’ DOWN!
If you can count them, you don’t have enough. LOL
Leni
Wonderful clear picture.
We should demand some heads at FOX
.
What was poorly done?
.
Look again.
Trump’s crowd is almost double.
Obama’s stops about 500 yards before the Washington monument, and you can see the grass for several blocks.
Chuck Todd, the Nazi midget, has a very large staff of full-time people preparing these attacks.
All the networks are probably pooling their resources and coordinating the attacks, also, multiplying the number of full-time people getting paid to take down Trump and his spokespeople.
How exactly do you "prepare" for that?
Chuck Todd himself gets paid $5000 to $7000 an hour to deliver the attacks, so he has to be good at it, or he'll be replaced.
Thanks for the link. Awesome view!
Yesterday, the unholy trio of Fox host, Bret Baier, plus the Kraut and Stirewalt were subtly knocking Trump at every opportunity...in their superior, "we-know-better-than-you-peons-do" mode.
Today, the marxist Judith Miller (who won a Phewlitter Prize, ya know) was doing the same arrogant, leftist mouthings in her sweet little smiley voice. Unbelievable, but she is now signed on as a regular "Fox Contributor" !
And, of course, all during the past days and evenings, there stands Fox D.C. correspondent, the ever-smooth and cool John Roberts in front of the White House deftly interspersing into all his many news reports his anti-Trumps snarks and innuendos delivered with all the innocence of Elsie Dinsmore.
He and Baier are tied for the lead in nicely slipping-in their hardly-noticeable, anti-Trumpisms into their reports.
If anyone thinks that the Fox Rupert Morlock family is trending to the Right to cozy up to the new president, he or she will be sadly disappointed.
It's important to listen closely to the actual words of these Fox anti-Trumpers (as opposed to just "watching" them) as they slip in their digs with skill and aplomb.
I find it fascinating to do so.
Leni
She simply could have said ‘you’re wrong chuck’ and then tell the viewers to look at CNN’s own gigapixel picture and decide for themselves. She just kept skirting around it. She could have shut him down right there.
Once again the answer to Faux News is One America News OAN IS what Faux News pretends to be. We travel so we can’t always get OAN. We solved the problem by having OAN’s app installed in an old lap top - $8.00 a month and no more Faux News. We tape Carlson and F*&K the rest of them especially BORe.
1) The post. The clickbait promised a photo. 45 seconds into the video, just an intro slide, no photo.
2) The Youtube 'video'. 45 seconds in, an intro slide, no substance.
Folks that don't know how to do propaganda should learn. Or find another hobby.
It doesn't really matter what you say in these new political wars.
It just matters that you're punching.
Go on Twitter to see what I mean.
How did you miss the photos?
Tell me again why we needed a Women's March, when we have such strong, competent, smart women like her as a role models already?
http://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-inauguration-gigapixel/
CNNs own site look at the crowd!
You must have been looking at a different video. The one at the Youtube link in the post has, for the first 50 seconds, a slide that just says, “Actual Crowd Size at Trump Inauguration” without actually showing a picture. It’s a mighty poor attempt at propaganda. The poster obviously would rather listen to the sound of his own voice than attempt to communicate.
Or, as I originally said, “Well, that was certainly poorly done.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.