Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York Times publisher vows to 'rededicate' paper to reporting honestly
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/11/12/new-york-times-publisher-vows-to-rededicate-itself-to-rep ^ | November 12, 2016 | FoxNews.com

Posted on 11/12/2016 6:56:49 AM PST by samtheman

The publisher of The New York Times penned a letter to readers Friday promising that the paper would “reflect” on its coverage of this year’s election while rededicating itself to reporting on “America and the world” honestly.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: deceit; dncmediacollusion; liberalmedia; media; medialies; news; nyt; nytbias
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-140 next last
To: pinkandgreenmom

That was exactly my response! My wife asked me what I was laughing about. So I read her the headline. She laughed too.


61 posted on 11/12/2016 7:28:09 AM PST by Nik Naym (It's not my fault... I have compulsive smart-ass disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

After 8 years of being cheerleaders for Obama they promise to report the corruption of the Trump administration.

Pray America woke


62 posted on 11/12/2016 7:28:34 AM PST by bray (The Silent Majority ROARED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Kind of like when a whore says she’s gonna stop whoring. Too late!


63 posted on 11/12/2016 7:28:46 AM PST by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

So the NYT will be a little less of the Democrat house organ for about a week then get back to being the urban pennysaver that Sulzberger has reduced it to. If it were the Omaha Times no one would pay heed to it. Perhaps they should move to Nebraska.


64 posted on 11/12/2016 7:31:15 AM PST by chuckee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
We believe we reported on both candidates fairly...

And we believe that you and your entire cesspool of "reporters" are journalistic hacks, with about as much ability (or desire) to report honestly, as Mad Magazine writers are to publish serious obituaries.

In fact, I'd believe Mad Magazine before I'd take a New York Times story on ANYTHING seriously.

Admit it Grey Lady...your time has come and gone...you are wrinkled, you have a substantial dowager hump, the makeup companies stay in business because of your nasty face and if you fall one more time, you probably will not get back up...and you ain't got "Life Alert".

Just go away, while you still have a smidgen of respectability (the crossword puzzle) left and fade into the sunset.

65 posted on 11/12/2016 7:32:02 AM PST by OldSmaj (We need to get to the White House and hide the silverware and crystal, before Wookie pawns it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthWillWin

Further translation: we’ve kissed minority backsides for 50 years, being purposefully provocative to the middle class. In recent meetings with our business development department we discovered very few subscription or newsstand purchases originating from minority zip codes. Please save our bacon.

Trump’s son in law buys the NY Times and merges it with his NY Observer.


66 posted on 11/12/2016 7:33:54 AM PST by ameribbean expat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

What they are saying is that they have spent the last 8 years kissing the ass of the Administration and writing puff pieces about the President and those days are over.


67 posted on 11/12/2016 7:35:57 AM PST by P-Marlowe (Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

The Trump Effect strikes again.

It is amazing that one guy (that’s right one guy) has had a huge impact on this country.

At least he came.

Wished he had come earlier though. Maybe we were not ready then.


68 posted on 11/12/2016 7:36:50 AM PST by moviefan8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Unfortunately, even if I were to show this to all the Hillary voters whom I know, they would first have to be de-hypnotized to be able to comprehend it.


69 posted on 11/12/2016 7:37:41 AM PST by Montaignes Cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
The New York Times Publisher and Editors:


70 posted on 11/12/2016 7:37:58 AM PST by Navy Patriot (America, a Rule of Mob nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

What was the price of the good name?


71 posted on 11/12/2016 7:42:04 AM PST by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HokieMom

Yeah, and I guess we’re Charlie Brown and he is Lucy with the football.


72 posted on 11/12/2016 7:44:16 AM PST by Bigg Red (To Thee, O Lord, I lift my soul. Thank you for saving our Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red

They HOPE we are...


73 posted on 11/12/2016 7:45:13 AM PST by HokieMom (Pacepa : Can the U.S. afford a president who can't recognize anti-Americanism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: aligncare
Searching the radio dial it rested upon NPR and the report I heard that was factually accurate in describing how many women (42%) rejected Hillary Clinton and did not succumb to the pressure from the Clinton campaign to vote for Clinton simply because she’s was a woman.

Yes I heard that NPR postmortem too. They even played audio of a woman complaining about the patronizing attitude and pressure to vote for Hillary.

Amazingly, there was finallya little self-criticism coming out of NPR this morning, even from some of the worst hosts. They admitted they had erred in first portraying Trump as a "joke," then as a "national menace." They seem to understand now that many voters resented this - ergo, it was a mistake.

Also shockingly, the NPR hosts admitted that their version of providing a "diversity of voices" (upon which they had prided themselves enormously), had not turned out to be genuinely inclusive, after all.

74 posted on 11/12/2016 7:45:36 AM PST by shhrubbery! (NIH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

These people are too far gone. They don’t get it. Firstly, they should fire the top editorial staff right now. These guys broke every rule of journalism. And in doing so, they sold a load of crap to their readers. Many of those readers were trying to figure out what was happening. And they could never explain Trump or Trump supporters because their paper was lying to them.

The New York Times has the best writing and the worst journalism. They sold their objectivity to the Obama White House for inside access. They would tell the Obama people what they were writing, what would be in tomorrows paper, and they were paid with stories and interviews that nobody else got. Just the same as Hillary sold her office. Obama sold government access and the New York Times was the buyer.


75 posted on 11/12/2016 7:47:33 AM PST by poinq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Impossible when the publishers definition of Truth is anything that supports his own totally made up godless religion. Fact is the truth is whatever this silly ass FEELS or NEEDS it to be at any given time.


76 posted on 11/12/2016 7:47:58 AM PST by TalBlack (Evil doesn't have a day job....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion

Lol


77 posted on 11/12/2016 7:51:28 AM PST by dp0622 (IThe only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
ALRIGHTY THEN, NO NEED TO WORRY  photo neville_chamberlain2_2.jpg
78 posted on 11/12/2016 7:53:07 AM PST by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

The NY Slimes for over a hundred years has lied to anyone dumb enough to buy it and/or read it.

My Grandfather called the NY Slimes a pro communist and a progressive lying sack of $$$$.

My parents said the same and hated the Slimes for its lies about the N. Viet congs winning and their editorials of hate against Reagan.

The NY Slimes’s cover ups of JFK and hit pieces against Reagan proved to me that my previous two generations of family never believing anything published by the NY Slimes were on target.

The Ny Slimes falls into the avoid/boycott strategy below:

Do we really need anything from the Never Trumpsters, listed below in our lives?:
1. Pollsters
2. Faux and ABCNNBCBS, phoney news, all left wing mediots/fish wraps.
3. GOPe radio talk show hosts posing as conservatives.
4. NFL games, pre games, post games and NFL endless prattle.
5. Ny Slimes, Compost, LA Slimes or any liberal fish wrap.
6. Vile left wing Follywood anti America jerks.
7. Grub Hub
8. Macy’s
9. Starbucks
10. Lifeway Foods
11. George Soros
12. _______________________ fill in the blank.

Eliminate any contact, business, dealings with the above for a happier and better life.


79 posted on 11/12/2016 7:53:15 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Hey whining losers,Trump will just go ahead & make things better for you/us without you!!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

That’s got to be a joke.


80 posted on 11/12/2016 7:53:46 AM PST by meatloaf (I am one irritated Vet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson