Posted on 10/25/2016 6:24:55 AM PDT by C19fan
Russia has unveiled chilling pictures of its largest ever nuclear missile, capable of destroying an area the size of France.
The RS-28 Sarmat missile, dubbed Satan 2 by Nato, has a top speed of 4.3 miles (7km) per second and has been designed to outfox anti-missile shield systems.
The new Sarmat missile could deliver warheads of 40 megatons - 2,000 times as powerful as the atom bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945.
Russian President Vladimir Putin is reportedly planning to replace the country's older SS-18 Satan weapons with the new missiles.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
“No, there are published papers from Sandia and Lawrence/Livermore that even if every single SS-18 Satan had the Mod 3 warhead (25MT) all launched and detonated at EMP altitude, it still wouldn’t cover all of CONUS or have long lasting effects. I forget the yield, but for ONE nuclear warhead to cause catastrophic EMP damage over all of CONUS would be in the gigaton range or high hundred megaton. Every nuclear weapon (less SADM/tactical nukes) the Russians have is approx. 1,056GT.”
First, thermonuclear (fusion) weapons are far from the ideal way to create EMP - fission (plain old atomic bombs, not hydrogen bombs) are better, even though the yield is lower. Second, the fission bombs can be tuned to produce far more of the particular EMP effects that are desired. You don’t need that much in the way of explosive force (1,056GT) to cripple a continent-sized nation like the US.
Yep. And it would have toasted the plane, too. As it is, they had large brass ones even to drop the "little" version.
These aren't practical weapons at that point. As someone pointed out up-thread, you get a lot more bang for the buck (sorry) from 40 1-MT weapons than you do from one 40-MT weapon. Which is why the arms race sort of stopped there.
Thank you...no chance of my ever becoming president, hence my freedom to engage in absurd diatribes. I think my ignorance is showing.
She just said the most idiotic message I have ever heard in a debate, and the most treasonous as well. To think some think that she should be POTUS while talking such things...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.