Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Full title :

The reason people were afraid of cats during the Middle Ages

Felines, despite having a good amount of domestic responsibilities, have not always been well regarded

1 posted on 10/16/2016 8:59:39 AM PDT by heterosupremacist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: heterosupremacist

As I read this, I’m sitting in my easy chair with Merlin next to me, on his back, getting his tummy rubbed, purring madly, and discussing the article with me every few seconds. “Mreeoww”


2 posted on 10/16/2016 9:03:23 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: heterosupremacist

The familiars of Middle Ages witches have become the pets of modern middle-age crazy cat ladies.

Coincidence? I think not.


3 posted on 10/16/2016 9:04:07 AM PDT by PLMerite (Lord, let me die fighting lions. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: heterosupremacist

Or they could hav been afraid of them because they carry fleas which spread disease


4 posted on 10/16/2016 9:05:57 AM PDT by Nifster (Ignore all polls. Get Out The Vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: heterosupremacist

They thought cats were carriers of the Black Death. So they killed the cats causing the real carrier, their fleas, to jump to the rats, becoming an even bigger problem.


5 posted on 10/16/2016 9:06:52 AM PDT by Disestablishmentarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: heterosupremacist

I’ve read an old wives’ tale that they sucked the breath out of infants.


6 posted on 10/16/2016 9:07:11 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: heterosupremacist

Our Nallie wishes to continue with her rule in her empire, aka our house, no matter the scholarly study.


7 posted on 10/16/2016 9:07:47 AM PDT by Wneighbor (Deplorable, livin in a swamp of crazy and lovin it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: heterosupremacist
1. Cats rule.
2. "Incompletely Domesticated" ... This is also why the left hates those of us who prefer freedom. Really, this is the kindest phrase that also agrees with exactly the left/media/globalist criticism of Trump, and I am proud to also deserve that criticism.
9 posted on 10/16/2016 9:10:47 AM PDT by tinyowl (A equals A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: heterosupremacist

Cats have an independence/dependence sort of a thing. Generally, if treated well, the will settle in quite comfortably with a family.


11 posted on 10/16/2016 9:22:52 AM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: heterosupremacist

Because they had eight too many lives?

Mouse Lives Matter!


13 posted on 10/16/2016 9:30:01 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: heterosupremacist

I, for one, am tired of all the old prejudices against cats.

They are not bad luck.

They don’t suck the breath out of babies.

They don’t hang around with witches.

These are all old, disproven prejudices.

They do give you warts, though.


15 posted on 10/16/2016 9:34:54 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: heterosupremacist




The cat, it is well to remember, remains the friend of man because it pleases him to do so and not because he must.” — Carl Van Vechten



23 posted on 10/16/2016 10:23:33 AM PDT by patriot08 (5th generation Texan-(girl type) ANGRY? REFUSE TO VOTE? VOTING 3RD PARTY? HELLO HILLARY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: heterosupremacist

Cats and Dogs
By H. P. Lovecraft

http://www.hplovecraft.com/writings/texts/essays/cd.aspx

The cat is for the aristocrat—whether by birth or inclinations or both—who admires his fellow-aristocrats (even if Little Belknap isn’t especially fond of Felis). He is for the man who appreciates beauty as the one living force in a blind and purposeless universe, and who worships that beauty in all its forms without regard for the sentimental and ethical illusions of the moment. For the man who knows the hollowness of feeling and the emptiness of human objects and aspirations, and who therefore clings solely to what is real—as beauty is real because it pretends to no significance beyond the emotion which it excites and is.

For the man who feels sufficient in the cosmos, and asks no false perspective of exaltation; who is moved by no mawkish scruples of conventional prejudice, but loves repose and strength and freedom and luxury and superiority and sufficiency and contemplation; who as a strong fearless soul wishes something to respect instead of something to lick his face and accept his alternate blows and strokings; who seeks a proud and beautiful equal in the peerage of individualism rather than a cowed and cringing satellite in the hierarchy of fear, subservience, and devotion.

The cat is not for the brisk, selfimportant little worker with a “mission”, but for the enlightened dreaming poet who knows that the world contains nothing really worth doing. The dilettante—the connoisseur—the decadent, if you will, though in a healthier age than this there were things for such men to do, so that they were the planners and leaders of those glorious pagan times. The cat is for him who does things not for empty duty but for power, pleasure, splendour, romance, and glamour—for the harpist who sings alone in the night of old battles, or the warrior who goes out to fight such battles for beauty, glory, fame, and the splendor of a kingly court athwart which no shadow of weakness or democracy falls. For him who will be lulled by no sops of prose and usefulness, but demands for his effort the ease and beauty and ascendancy and cultivation which alone make effort worth while. For the man who knows that play, not work, and leisure, not bustle, are the great things of life; and that the round of striving merely in order to strive some more is a bitter irony of which the civilized soul accepts as little as it can.


25 posted on 10/16/2016 10:29:53 AM PDT by Lx (Do you like it? Do you like it, Scott? I call it, "Mr. & Mrs. Tenorman Chili.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: heterosupremacist

“” The reason people were afraid of cats during the Middle Ages

Felines, despite having a good amount of domestic responsibilities, have not always been well regarded””

And -—— the cats didn’t give a darn.


27 posted on 10/16/2016 10:34:43 AM PDT by Exit148 ((Loose Chnge Club founder) Put yours aside for the next Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: heterosupremacist

many poeple are afraid of cats

but with good reason

cats are the Superior Life Force on Rock Three


31 posted on 10/16/2016 10:51:33 AM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicians are not born. They're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero. news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: heterosupremacist

“kept the insufferable mice in check.”

Plus cats can read our minds.


32 posted on 10/16/2016 10:53:15 AM PDT by Leep (Just say no to half dead hillary and wrong lane kaine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: heterosupremacist

bump


39 posted on 10/16/2016 11:35:52 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (We will be one People, under one God, saluting one American flag. --Donald Trump (standing ovation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: heterosupremacist
Heretic cats?

Is that how the Cathars got their name?

Nowadays, we call them hipsters.

PS Heretic Cats actually is the name of a band.

43 posted on 10/16/2016 12:56:58 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: heterosupremacist

When learning English as a second language, it is imperative to know that the phrases “house cat” and “cat house” are not interchangeable.


49 posted on 10/16/2016 3:21:22 PM PDT by mumblypeg (We've had a p***y in the White House for 8 years. Make America Macho Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: heterosupremacist

I read an article the other day that said in the early years of the plague people thought cats were carriers and turned against cats. Later it was believed rats and mice were actual carriers, if so they truly cut their nose off to spite their face by getting rid of cats in large numbers.

Some researchers now do not believe the plague was carried by rats, mice, or cats. They seem to think it spread to rapidly and was more likely person to person.


52 posted on 10/16/2016 5:14:55 PM PDT by Tammy8 (Please be a regular supporter of Free Republic !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: heterosupremacist

Cats choose their ‘owners’.

Who really never ‘own’ them...............


57 posted on 11/21/2022 11:08:37 AM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson