Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/08/2016 12:45:52 PM PDT by simpson96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last
To: simpson96

When you remove the symbolism and meaning to not offend anybody, you remove the meaning and reason to see it.


2 posted on 09/08/2016 12:47:54 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

Wow. I wonder how it feels to get smoked by Ghostbusters (the chick version)


3 posted on 09/08/2016 12:49:35 PM PDT by Cowboy Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

Too bad. It was a great movie.


4 posted on 09/08/2016 12:49:52 PM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (Go Egypt on 0bama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

What I don’t understand about Hollywood is that to anyone outside Hollywood this remake sounded like a really bad idea so why didn’t Hollywood figure that out too?


5 posted on 09/08/2016 12:50:28 PM PDT by vladimir998 (Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

“Is this a bust or what?”
“Yes, very impressive!”


6 posted on 09/08/2016 12:50:53 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96
I kind of liked this version of Ben-Hur. Gave what I thought was a fairly realistic (as far as that goes) look at life during that time period. It had a good plot, good action without being overpowering action, and the acting was decent. They did have the references to Christ throughout...i know that was in the original but haven't seen that since I was a kid so have nothing to compare it against.

Saw it on a double bill with Star Trek Beyond. Didn't like it. WAY too much action and things going on. Can't even follow the actions of the main characters 1/2 the time due to the spectacle. And I'm a huge star trek fan.

8 posted on 09/08/2016 12:54:23 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96
I did not wish the filmmakers any ill will, but it was foolish to remake a movie as classic as the 1959 Ben-Hur.
12 posted on 09/08/2016 12:56:36 PM PDT by Sans-Culotte ("Political Correctness is communist propaganda writ small" - Theodore Dalrymple)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

This is one movie that did not need a remake, especially by a now mostly agnostic if not atheist Hollywood.


14 posted on 09/08/2016 12:56:58 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

What marketing spend?

Honestly, been to the movies a few times recently, other than the poster in the lobby for the thing, don’t think I’ve seen a single ad, or preview or anything else for it.


15 posted on 09/08/2016 12:57:53 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96
The trailer for the remake of The Magnificent Seven makes me think this will be a short-lived record.


16 posted on 09/08/2016 12:58:00 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

I saw a short clip of the chariot race on TV.

Horrible CGI. William Wyler and Robert Surtees got so much more out of men, horses, metal, wood and celluloid than Timur could get out of petaflops and petabytes.


17 posted on 09/08/2016 12:58:17 PM PDT by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

All that CGI and they did a worse chariot race.

19 posted on 09/08/2016 12:58:38 PM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96
The math is not right.

The movie cost "nearly 100 Million to make" plus marketing. It had grossed 54 Million so far and they claim a $120 million loss.

My brother-in-law worked as an accountant for a major studio. His comment to me once was: If the box office receipts equal production costs, then everyone has "made money". He also gave me many examples of how they bury 'costs' so as to put money into the right pockets.

21 posted on 09/08/2016 12:59:40 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (Open borders will be the 'beso de la muerte for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

Rotten Tomatoes gave it a 28% rating, which is abysmal.


23 posted on 09/08/2016 1:01:47 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

Not wise at all to try to remake Classic Movies.

What will he try next Gone with the Wind?


29 posted on 09/08/2016 1:05:58 PM PDT by Bullish (That establishment heads from both sides are exploding over Trump is the very best part.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

This flop was totally predictable.

1959's Ben Hur won a record breaking 11 Academy Awards including BEST PICTURE!

Ben Hur was also the fastest-grossing as well as the highest-grossing film of 1959, and was second in "all time gross receipts" right behind Gone With The Wind at that time.

I remember my parents making reservations with the Capri Theater so we could see Ben-Hur at their Sunday showing right after Church!

30 posted on 09/08/2016 1:07:15 PM PDT by onyx (YOU'RE POSTING HERE, SO DONATE MONTHLY! NOT NICE TO FREEPLOAD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

I’m glad they didn’t do an all-female remake.


32 posted on 09/08/2016 1:08:39 PM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

I suppose this happens when you have a great original and then do a remake. Lacking in ideas or simply lazy, Hollywood has made numerous remakes that have not lived up to the original, and thus many people are not eager to so see another one.


33 posted on 09/08/2016 1:08:51 PM PDT by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

Never remake a movie that doesn’t need remade. Remake a movie that hardly anyone has heard of or was only moderately successful or even a flop.


35 posted on 09/08/2016 1:10:02 PM PDT by Leep (Hillary Clinton does not approve of this message.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: simpson96

I bet if the original was digitized and released on the big screen, it would have grossed almost as much...

Something as powerful and well made as the original is hard to beat..


38 posted on 09/08/2016 1:13:22 PM PDT by Popman (Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson