Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump/Fiorina

Posted on 03/16/2016 11:22:28 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler

Vanity


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2016election; california; carlyfiorina; carlyfornia; election2016; icarly; newyork; president; trump; trumpfiorina; vice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

1 posted on 03/16/2016 11:22:29 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

No.


2 posted on 03/16/2016 11:23:43 PM PDT by House Atreides (CRUZ or lose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

No, Fiorina doesn’t add anything of complementary value to the ticket.


3 posted on 03/16/2016 11:23:51 PM PDT by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

no

Whoever he chooses will be a surprise, you can bet on it!


4 posted on 03/16/2016 11:25:14 PM PDT by siamesecats (God closes one door, and opens another, to protect us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

a two bagger ain’t going to cut it


5 posted on 03/16/2016 11:25:44 PM PDT by Lib-Lickers 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Not only no, but HELL NO!

Are you trying to make me have to kill myself, Jeff, come on, man.

6 posted on 03/16/2016 11:26:08 PM PDT by chris37 (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Fiorina has gone to the side of evil.


7 posted on 03/16/2016 11:27:54 PM PDT by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
No. He's already said he wants an experienced politician from a swing state.

Which I think is wise. I know Freepers don't want to hear it, but I'm still thinking Kasich will be the pick.

It makes strategic sense.

8 posted on 03/16/2016 11:28:35 PM PDT by TontoKowalski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

No, Trump has already said he will need to pick a running mate who knows the day-to-day workings of Congress. It should be someone young enough to be a viable candidate in 2024, so Sessions and Newt are not likely either.


9 posted on 03/16/2016 11:28:43 PM PDT by Kellis91789 (The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Trump/Look at that Face. No way Jose.


10 posted on 03/16/2016 11:30:21 PM PDT by TexasCruzin ( He always hits back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

No.


11 posted on 03/16/2016 11:30:43 PM PDT by proust (Texans for Trump! The Art Of The Comeback!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Oh Phulease. At least if you are going to put up a politician willing to whore, at least pick an attractive one. She has an eagle beak and dead eyes. (Her politics actually disqualify her 100%, but at least be a tease with silly posts.)


12 posted on 03/16/2016 11:31:55 PM PDT by LesbianThespianGymnasticMidget (God punishes Conservatives by making them argue with fools. Go Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3325291/posts
Carly Fiorina’s conversion from Hillary Clinton fan to fervent critic
washingtonpost.com ^ | 8/14/15 | Ruth Marcus

In 2010, the then-GOP Senate nominee went all middle-school-cafeteria on her Democratic opponent’s hairdo. “God, what is that hair? Sooo yesterday,” Fiorina, already miked up, commented, quoting an aide’s assessment. Two years earlier, in the makeup room at ABC’s “This Week” with me, Fiorina said something that, at the time, was mildly interesting, but is now revelatory. It was May 2008, close to the end of the long primary battle between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, and we were discussing the two Democratic contenders.

At which point Fiorina, then a campaign surrogate for presumptive GOP nominee John McCain, offered some unprompted praise for Clinton: If Fiorina hadn’t been backing McCain, she told me, she would have been for Clinton.

“That’s off the record,” Fiorina immediately added.


13 posted on 03/16/2016 11:32:29 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris37; 4rcane
Well, she meets a requirement mentioned on the Trump/Rubio thread: Scarier than Trump.
14 posted on 03/16/2016 11:32:46 PM PDT by snarkpup (I want a government small enough that my main concern in life doesn't need to be who's running it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

They both praised Hillary in the past and gave her huge amounts of money.


15 posted on 03/16/2016 11:33:32 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TontoKowalski

I think it will be Christie. He sees the fighter in Christie, and he said it would have to be someone who could take over for him if need be. I don’t think Mr. Trump thinks Mr. Kasich is presidential material (mostly because he’s such a dweeb).


16 posted on 03/16/2016 11:33:55 PM PDT by JudyinCanada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada
Could be. In my mind, Christie is already the Attorney General.

A New York/New Jersey ticket would be something different.

But then again, so was Texas/Wyoming and Arkansas/Tennessee and those were both winning tickets.

17 posted on 03/16/2016 11:37:51 PM PDT by TontoKowalski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

No.


18 posted on 03/16/2016 11:38:02 PM PDT by Carthego delenda est
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris37

She’s a scary lady!


19 posted on 03/16/2016 11:38:26 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TontoKowalski

Yup, you are right.

Trump/Kasich does make sense and is a very proper choice given the political calculus of grabbing a much needed swing state.

Kasich is a bit of an oddball. His karate chop speech mannerism is a hoot :-)

Trump/Kasich and also Cruz to the SCOTUS makes sense and I can live with those choices.

Reagan/Bush was a MUCH more nauseating situation :-(

The time for deals like this is NOW! Both Kasich and Cruz have leverage at this moment in time to make a deal with Trump. If those deals are made it will cut the GOPee off at the knees and make a lot of people very happy.


20 posted on 03/16/2016 11:40:55 PM PDT by Bobalu (I'm spitting on my hands, and hoisting the black flag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson