Posted on 02/29/2016 12:50:56 PM PST by dlt
On Sunday Donald Trump went on CNN and was asked once again about David Dukes endorsement. Trump told Jake Tapper he didnt know anything about David Duke or white supremacy.
This sent shock waves across the liberal media and GOP establishment circles.
Trump already said his earpiece was not working earlier than that. Saturday or Sunday, or even earlier, if I recall correctly.
Trump hasn’t spent his whole livelihood shaping narrative. Rush has. Even Rush admits that is what is behind the motives of most reporters. INCLUSION. EXCLUSIVITY. Trump earned his quite differently that Rush “earns” his.
But then you know this.
You are making accusations of me that you cannot substantiate because they do not exist.
The reason you've been threatened with the zot is because you're a liar. You just jump on a thread and start making unfounded, slanderous accusations...say whatever it takes to disrupt and benefit a particular agenda.
Alas, everyone knows it's for naught.
Not that you care, the check still cashes.
But then you know this.
Read the link posted with this thread. It will give you the entire context. He most definitely was giving Trump the benefit of the doubt about Trump’s strange behavior on Sunday. Seems to me he did Trump a service here.
As far as Jell-o goes, I guess you can have your opinion. Go get ‘em tiger.
Perhaps Rush will change his tune on the morrow in the framework of the earpiece gambit. He himself has extensive experience with that particular impediment. :)
Yes, he spent his whole livelihood "working". And you can see Trump's work ethic reflected and magnified in his children.
According to his children, their father lives for work.
They despair because if their father becomes Emperor, trips to Hawaii, or trips to go fishing, will be outlawed as "frivolities". Golf, however, will become the national sport, on the plus side. /tongue-in-cheek :)
I think what Trump inherited from his father was the work ethic. I respect that greatly. I like the business acumen, too. :)
What did Rush say?
I don’t want to believe he said this but that’s what I heard unless I missed the point.
The entire context is found at the link at the start of the thread. Decide for yourself whether he was dogging Trump or trying to explain a strange situation.
Either way, we’re only talking about a candidate for the Republican nomination. As far as I know, everybody realizes Trump is a somewhat flawed candidate that will have difficulty in the general (perhaps less difficulty than the others).
True. But when hasn’t there been a heated discussion surrounding Trump? LOL.
But apparently they all watch the Sunday shows, according to Limbaugh.
Clearly I am better informed than you. Address your reply to yourself. You are the only one who you will convince.
His children are very impressive. I wish they were mine. More then I would like his wealth, I would like his success with those children of his.
Errr... more THAN.
sad to see green eyed marxist notions alive and well even in the GOPe... :smh:
Don’t forget David Brock, Hillary’s fag henchette, spews disinformation about Rush all the time. I would guess “it” is the source of this claim.
I don’t believe Rush went to the Dark Side. He was just confused. He kept asking, “What’s going on here? Trump blamed it on his mic.”
Rush also pointed out later that Trump had denounced David Duke BEFORE the interview.
Trump clearly favors Cruz as the closes to Reagan we will ever see. Highest compliment he can make.
At the same time, he told a caller that he refuses to destroy anyone who can defeat the democrats. That I think was from the heart as well. And he included Trump in that statement specifically.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.