Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unexpected Results From DNA Tests
Self | January 12, 2016 | Self

Posted on 01/13/2016 1:40:00 PM PST by Little Bill

I am wondering if any FReepers had unexpected results when they did a DNA test during a family History search.

In my case I was looking for an oppressed history of serfdom and general nastiness from Norman Overlords during the Middle Ages, just preparing for an Obama America.

To my surprise I discovered we were Normans, in the Staple, Merchants, and in general capitalists, until God and Religion brought us unto this Blessed Shore to continue in the same trades.

So in this election year of the usual Freeper cage fights I thought to step outside the blood and gore of FReeper politics and speak of Family History.


TOPICS: History; Hobbies; Science
KEYWORDS: dna; genealogy; godsgravesglyphs; helixmakemineadouble; results; strange
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-223 next last
To: refermech

According to mitochondrial DNA analysis, every person living today shares a common ancestor: a woman who lived in Africa about 250,000 years ago.


21 posted on 01/13/2016 1:51:12 PM PST by p. henry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill
The use of DNA testing to attribute ethnic background is subject to dispute and uncertainty. The genetic markers relied on are rarely unique to one group or another and yield only a range of probabilities. The leading test services also tend to be opaque as to precisely what markers they use, and the selection of markers is changed frequently based on new population studies.

All said though, how does it feel now being one of the Norman overlords? I hope that you do not attempt to take up the exercise of droit du seigneur on the local maidens. The times being what they are, that could set the local gendarmes and outraged and armed male kinfolk after you.

22 posted on 01/13/2016 1:51:34 PM PST by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill

I was surprised to find I’m 16% Scandinavian. I’d had no idea there was any Scandinavian in me!


23 posted on 01/13/2016 1:52:24 PM PST by Nea Wood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wny
I am a direct descendent of Catherine the Great.

That is really great. Must be related. I am descended form Charles the Hammer Martel, Some Egyptian Pharaoh, some Caesars, Kings of Jerusalem, a bunch of Knights...

Now for my real brag, I am not related to Obama.

24 posted on 01/13/2016 1:52:34 PM PST by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill

My dad’s cousin had his done and he thinks it proves we are not descended from the exact person we thought we were, ten generations back.


25 posted on 01/13/2016 1:53:25 PM PST by Bodleian_Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CGASMIA68; Afterguard

>> I am wondering why some one would submit their DNA to any one....IMO wow talk about a security boondogle
>> the last thing I want finding its way into the public domain is my DNA.

See? That’s ANOTHER advantage of the Tick Family Tree Service.

I don’t actually analyze the sample — I throw it away unopened and just make stuff up.


26 posted on 01/13/2016 1:54:08 PM PST by Nervous Tick (There is no "allah" but satan, and mohammed was his demon-possessed tool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill

I haven’t done a DNA test, but my father did some geneological research and found that his family came from a line of silversmiths in jolly old England. They brought over a silver tea set with their coat of arms on it (meaning at some point, one of our ancestors had earned that coat somehow), but our cousins in Michigan were the elder branch of the family, so they got it. Who knows where it is now.


27 posted on 01/13/2016 1:55:45 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill; blam
It's a commonplace experience among people who participate in surname group studies through a shared interest in genealogy. Test error is probably not the issue; missing paper trail is the issue 99% of the time. People who lost a spouse and other parent to their child or children didn't wait around, typically they'd remarry as quick as they could find an acceptable candidate. The adoptive parent becomes the most recent and therefore only parent in the record, and in a lot of old-time families none of that information got passed down.

There's also the "act like a fool factor", which no one wants to admit their ancestors did. In my experience, genealogists are really nice people who nevertheless like everything exact, cut and dried, and are absolutely sure that *only they* have the correct information.

In one of my surname groups, the test participants (1000s by now) are split into four groups; while all of them are, on paper, from common ancestors circa 400 years back, each of the first three groups are indeed of common descent, but don't match the other two large groups. The fourth group doesn't match anyone else in the study, except perhaps some first cousins.

28 posted on 01/13/2016 1:55:52 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
When I first had mine run I had an email from a person who was an exact match, born in the town that my family founded, and was illegitimate. The best I could do was send him to a Family History site run by a Cousin.

Gets even better. I had an email from England, another exact match who wanted to know if a family member who was stationed in England during WW2 knocked up his mother.

29 posted on 01/13/2016 1:56:00 PM PST by Little Bill (o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

LOL, I was wondering if this could be a scam. I suppose there could be some legit ones.


30 posted on 01/13/2016 1:56:05 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: CGASMIA68

The goobermint probably uses those DNA results.


31 posted on 01/13/2016 1:57:03 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dforest

I used FNDNA.


32 posted on 01/13/2016 1:57:09 PM PST by Little Bill (o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill

Yeah, my ancestors were those nasty, oppressive, hardworking, racist/sexist/homophobic, Caucasian Puritans and Quakers


33 posted on 01/13/2016 1:57:52 PM PST by A_Former_Democrat (If you're "offended" by "Merry Christmas" then you have much bigger issues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dforest

>> I suppose there could be some legit ones.

There probably are. I’m just poking some irreverent fun.

I had an aunt (since passed) who was “all ate up” with the genealogy stuff. She bragged that she had us traced back to Charlemagne. I used to yank her chain by wondering aloud why EVERY family gynecologist traces the roots back to Charlemagne or Catherine the Great or King Gustav or something... never to some peasant. There were WAY more peasants.


34 posted on 01/13/2016 1:59:32 PM PST by Nervous Tick (There is no "allah" but satan, and mohammed was his demon-possessed tool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

"For a penny I'll scribble you anything you want. From summons, decrees, edicts, warrants, patents of nobility."

35 posted on 01/13/2016 1:59:35 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Afterguard
If they want any DNA they can get it off the back of a stamp or envelope that you mailed to who knows who.

I did it and was surprised to find 1% Neanderthal and some Greek connections. I knew we had come up from Austria through Germany and England and Scotland, but I guess the Greeks migrated North as everyone else.

36 posted on 01/13/2016 2:01:30 PM PST by Battle Axe (Repent: for the coming of the Lord is soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill

On my mom’s side direct descendents of the Lucy family some of whom still reside in the family home in Charlecote in Warwickshire.

My father’s side is less documented. Family legend has it brothers left Ireland just ahead of the law. They supposedly changed their name upon arrival in the USA.

No DNA tests in the public domain. The government is trying to get access to the DNA information in Ancestry.com for “law enforcement and homeland security purposes”.


37 posted on 01/13/2016 2:02:15 PM PST by Roses0508
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill

Aw shucks, here I thought this would be a thread about finding out if Obunga’s “children” were related to him and Micheal or not.


38 posted on 01/13/2016 2:04:50 PM PST by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill

The lower classes tended to be cannon fodder, except when the plagues took them. Nearly everybody alive is descended from dark age royalty.


39 posted on 01/13/2016 2:05:44 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
My family were abolitionists, Calvinists, and not adverse to making a large return on investments, so I suspect they may have saved many Africans from their Muslim enslavers and death at the hands of their African Brothers.
40 posted on 01/13/2016 2:05:57 PM PST by Little Bill (o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-223 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson