Posted on 10/20/2015 8:44:07 AM PDT by Lazamataz
Donald Trump in 2016 is the last hope for America. Ted Cruz is also a very good choice, but he just doesn't seem to quite light people on fire like Trump does.
It may be too late for America, but we must try to reverse the damage of the Bush/Clinton/Bush/Obama years. Unrestricted -- even encouraged -- illegal invasion of America is changing the very face of the electorate. We are losing in Trade Negotiations with the Chinese. Iran is on the brink of a nuclear weapon, and recently unveiled thousands of mobile missile launchers capable of delivering those weapons. Obamacare threatens to destroy the great American medical system. The NSA spies on our own citizenry, and the Obama administration keeps reiterating the twisted notion that those Americans who revere the Constitution, are terrorists. Disarmists vow to take guns out of the hands of civilians, leaving them at the mercy of a rapidly-tyrannizing American government. The ballooning federal budget is utterly unsustainable and is guaranteed to collapse. Homosexuality is raised up as preferable to heterosexuality. The fascism of language (political correctness) is used to club everyday people into silence. Abortion mills now sell fetal body parts on e-Bay.
This is a horrific time.
We need a b@ll-busting, tough motherhugger who does not 'fiv a guck' what the 'news media' has to say about him. We need a bull who brings his own damn china shop with him. We need someone to get in there, crack heads, and bust up the establishment.
Trump is that man.
He's someone who cannot be bought. Heck, HE can buy THEM, if he cares to.
Just about everything he says lately, is in alignment with my beliefs. He wants to deport illegals. He wants to build a wall on the Southern border. His Presidency would mean the end of Political Correctness language fascism. He'd negotiate HARD with the Chinese and Russians, and both countries would have a new respect -- maybe even fear -- of us. Iran wouldn't be able to toss us the middle finger while it built more nuclear weapons. He's pro-Second Amendment. He'd pick some pro-America SCOTUS justices.
The Establishment Elitists in both parties (Republican and Democrat) have torn down America, and are terrified of a Trump Presidency. He is the right man at the right time.
If you don't like DONALD TRUMP, YOU ARE A COMMIE ONE-WORLD ELITIST HACK. DON'T BE A COMMIE ONE-WORLD ELITIST HACK.
Seems like this was written to cement my determination NOT to vote for Trump.
You don’t win votes by insulting people... that never works.
I don’t care for Trump. I think Cruz would make a much better president. And if that makes me a commie in your eyes then so be it.
I guess that answers that “musical question” re: “Laz hitting it”.
You’re about to pay the price for inserting your tongue in your cheek on the FR, Laz.
Very subtle. lol
Weak, Laz. You're better than that.
Go Trump!
Go Laz!
Ping to non commies!
Ted Cruz, last week, on Russia, Syria, Obama, 'missile defense' and the New START treaty with Putin...
"If we want to actually dismantle ISIS, we need to dramatically change course. We need a real, robust campaign that maximizes our overwhelming air advantage.
We need to focus our efforts not on trying to create friends, but on supporting our real ones, especially the Kurds in Iraq and Syria who have actually had success against ISIS."
-snip-
"We can redouble our efforts to develop the defensive weapons that neutralized the offensive Soviet threat -- particularly missile defense, which has seen a 25% budget reduction under Obama, according to an analysis from the conservative Heritage Foundation, and has been constrained by bad arms deals like New START.
We should not only move quickly to install the canceled interceptor sites Putin opposed in Poland and the Czech Republic, but also to develop the next generation of systems that will only increase his discomfiture.
These options do not entail a ground war in Syria, yet would effectively shake us free from the failed policies that have brought us to our current impasse.
These options set us on a new path that puts Putin on notice that the United States is reclaiming our traditional role as leader of the free world."
http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/09/opinions/cruz-syria-putin/index.html
************************************************************
“I think it would be a mistake to get involved in the Syrian civil war. There have been voices in Washington eager for us to send our sons and daughters over to fight that civil war for some time. I haven’t been one of them. I think the touchstone of U.S. military policy should be protecting the national security of this country.
“What we’re seeing Putin in Russia do is a direct response to the profound weakness of Obama over six and a half years.
Putin views Obama as weak, as ineffective, and frankly, as a laughingstock. And, as a result, he is moving in, he is invading his neighbors – like Ukraine – he’s kidnapping Estonians, and he’s moving into Syria to gain a stronger foothold in the Middle East."
*********************************************************************************************
"According to the Washington Free Beacon, Russia’s nuclear arsenal how has over 100 nuclear warheads above the limit set by the treaty.
Since the treaty was launched, Russia has deployed 111 new nuclear warheads, bringing its total number of deployed warheads to 1,648. That treaty limit is 1,550 warheads — a number that must be reached in 2018.
Comparatively, the numbers of U.S. nuclear warheads, missiles and bombers have fallen dramatically and are already below the limits set by the treaty. Additionally, the United States has decreased the number of warheads in its deployed nuclear arsenal by 250.
While the United States intends to eliminate heavy bombers and launchers, Russia has launched a strategic nuclear force expansion.
Russian President Vladimir Putin also recently announced a new doctrine that placed priority on nuclear forces.
If this raises concern for you, you are not alone.
Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Ala., chairman of the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Strategic Forces, said Russia “is in the business of violating treaties.”
Rogers said Putin has violated several agreements and treaties in the past, and he simply “violates any treaty or agreement that puts limits on capabilities that Mr. Putin and his cronies desire.”
“Russia’s arguable adherence to the New START Treaty just indicates how bad a deal it is for the United States,” he said.
Adm. William Gortney, commander of the U.S. Northern Command, said Wednesday that Russia has read our play book and is “fielding cruise missiles that are very, very accurate, very long range.”
Gortney said these missiles have the ability to reach targets in Canada and the United States. He added that Russia has been participating in war game scenarios recently that simulate cruise missile strikes in Alaska.
This news is serious because it appears Russia has no intention of abiding by New START or any other treaty. We should therefore be building up our military and our arsenals instead of depleting them.
===============================================================
From the FreeBeacon:
Russia Adds 111 Warheads Under Arms Treaty
Moscow warheads above New START treaty limit
By: Bill Gertz
October 9, 2015
Russia has now deployed more than 100 nuclear warheads in its strategic arsenal above the limits set by the New START arms treaty limits—two years before it must meet treaty arms reduction goals.
"New START nuclear warhead and delivery system numbers made public Oct. 1 reveal that since the 2010 arms accord went into force, Moscow increased the number of deployed nuclear warheads by a total of 111 weapons for a total of 1,648 deployed warheads. That number is 98 warheads above the treaty limit of 1,550 warheads that must be reached by the 2018 deadline of the treaty.
At the same time, U.S. nuclear warheads, missiles, and bombers have fallen sharply and remain below the required levels under the New START pact.
The United States during the same period of the Russian increases cut its deployed nuclear arsenal by 250 warheads. ..." (more...)
http://freebeacon.com/national-security/russia-adds-111-warheads-under-arms-treaty/
Wait, so you are telling me that this post was controversial?
It livens the board up. :)
“Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humour, it is impossible to create a parody of zealotry that someone won't mistake for the real thing.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.