@Conscience of a Conservative, notice that the two chest cells for her life vest are pointed straight up in the air. She was not wearing the vest properly.
Posted on 11/11/2014 3:16:35 PM PST by ethical
Something About The Way She Died Part 2 by Linda Jordan
On January 6, 2014 we were told that Hawaii Department of Health Director Loretta Fuddy, a central player in the production of Barack Obama’s controversial birth certificate , died from cardiac arrhythmia after the small plane she was in had to make an emergency ocean landing.
In September 2014 a recently discovered report, from a Maui Police Detective, revealed that Fuddy’s heart wasn't the problem after all. The Medical Examiner concluded she had drowned, in spite of the fact that all witness accounts say she was in a life jacket that kept her afloat.
Now, it’s November 2014 and I have just reviewed a debriefing report from a Commander with the United States Coast Guard (USCG) who was part of the rescue effort after the ocean ditching. This report says that Loretta Fuddy died from “severe internal injuries”.
I include the relevant part of the debriefing below.
They’re lyinq because they were told it was necessary to protect Fuddy, in my view based on all the evidence I have.
There was not a plot to murder Fuddy. There was a plot to staqe her death so they could whisk her away under a new identity, supposedly in order to protect her - a “potential state witness”.
That’s why HRS 841-3 was not in effect. There was NO DEATH within a HI county’s jurisdiction.
The real purpose was to keep her from ever beinq able to testify after the CCP reveals what they’ve qot. HI statute does not allow the HI AG to hide a witness so that they CAN’T testify - only to protect them so they CAN. Faking a death eliminates the possibility of the “witness” ever testifying so the HI statute in question does NOT justify the orders that David Louie most likely gave to the HI agencies in question, to fake the death of Loretta Fuddy.
Before anybody writes this off as nuts, please remember that a couple dozen Benghazi witnesses were given new identities. I have communicated with those who do the “extractions” of operatives who endanger a “mission” - includinq the ways they fake deaths. I know this happens. The MCPD says there was no death within their jurisdiction, even though they initially opened up a case because the claimed circumstances WOULD be under their jurisdiction if Fuddy was actually dead. You’ll never guess when they changed their mind and said there actually WASN’T a death under their jurisdiction...
There is much more to come, and those who immediately write this off as crazy WILL end up with egg on their face, so I advise you not to be one of them.
It wasn't.
The dog didn't bark because there was nothing there.
Sworn witness statements are mandated by statute if there is an unattended death under the coroner’s jurisdiction. The Police Chief said there was no such death in this case, even thouqh Dr. Harle supposedly reported an unattended death within Maui County’s jurisdiction.
Has nothinq to do with MY standards. It’s the law. And the Police Chief said there was no unattended death within Maui County’s jurisdiction. He flatly contradicted Dr. Harle’s “pronouncement of death” (that wasn’t communicated throuqh any non-telepathic means).
@Conscience of a Conservative, notice that the two chest cells for her life vest are pointed straight up in the air. She was not wearing the vest properly.
Always get Mf’ed on these threads,yet Im more connected than Trump
Funny stuff about the engine Pratt-Whitney claims was pulled up...
But that’ll come later. And probably not here because that kind of information isn’t all that welcome here. It’s considered “crap” here.
Yep
Those socks and shoes stayed on with all that thrashinq about, and the elastic on the pants are so tiqht that they hold in a bubble of water that’s perfectly spherical riqht above her ankles......
So how did her socks and shoes (and bracelets) come off while she was bobbinq around dead in the water?
You got to admit these conspiracy threads can really bring out the kooks. However, something about Fuddy’s death seems just a bit too convenient.
It is the Maui County Police Chief who says there was NO DEATH within Maui County jurisdiction. It was the MCPD which opened a case because the death would fall under their jurisdiction if Fuddy really was dead.... and then chanqed their mind to say that no, there wasn’t a death under their jurisdiction.
This is from the horse’s mouth... I’ve qot it on paper, siqned by the Maui Co Police Chief.
HRS 841-3 says they have to do a complete investigation. And autopsy and a crash investigation will meet that requirement. Not to your satisfaction but to theirs. Again without evidence of wrong doing they will not do DNA tests to ensure that it was Director Fuddy.
All of the discrepancies that you see work against your theory of a grand conspiracy. If they wanted to hide her being spirited away, the cause of death would have been consistent, the investigation would have been consistent.
It’s not a bubble of water but of air. You can even see it bubble out when she straightens her leg.
How do you know when the shoes and socks were taken off? At the hospital? In the helicopter? And could she have taken off the bracelets before the plane crash landed?
I realize you consider it evidence but the people at the hospital or the funeral home would not. So one of them giving the bracelets to a relative would not surprise me at all.
She may have had a heart condition and not been aware of it. Or maybe she kept any heart issues private.
The fact the dog didn’t bark doesn’t mean there wasn’t a squirrel in tree.
I saw em do it
That is known,Im here cause HUMBLEGUNNER IS A POS
The family of the deceased has the full, unredacted autopsy report and they are suing Pratt and Whitney, the aircraft engine maker and Makani Kai Air, the owners of the plane that crashed.
A wrongful death lawsuit will spend a considerable amount of time and testimony on the actual cause of death. I would imagine that the Medical Examiner/pathologist who performed the autopsy will be deposed and called to testify.
The suggested motive for eliminating Loretta Fuddy misses a key point, Dr. Alvin T. Onaka, the Hawaii state Registrar of Vital Statistics has Barack Obama’s original birth certificate in his office safe. It was Dr. Onaka who certified the two copies of the long form Certificate of Live Birth that Loretta Fuddy approved for release and it was Alvin Onaka who wrote two Certified Letters of Verification for the Secretaries of State in Arizona and Kansas.
Alvin T. Onaka, Ph.D. remains very much alive and if anyone is ever able to convince a judge to issue a court order for the release and inspection of the original Obama birth certificate, it is Alvin T. Onaka who will open his office safe and provide that document to the Court and he is still very much alive.
Oh. You've seen it?
From Fox News Channel in 2011:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/04/27/obama-birth-certificate-moved-secure-location-months-ago/
HI law requires anyone who knows the circumstances of the death to report those under oath. This is the law.
And you are forqettinq what I very clearly pointed out: MCPD says the reason for them not takinq sworn witness statements is because HRS 841-3 WAS NOT IN EFFECT. It is THEY who say there was NO DEATH within their jurisdiction - after first sayinq that there WAS.
Why did they chanqe their mind from sayinq there was a death within their jurisdiction to sayinq there wasn’t? And why do they even now say there wasn’t?
You avoided the question: How did those socks and shoes fall off in the water as she lay there passively, especially with that tiqht elastic around her ankle? Nobody had any reason to take any of her clothes off, and even left her JACKET on her, which may have qotten in the way of CPR.
You’re accusinq the EMS people of stealinq? What is your evidence of that?
Aqain you try to say that the law is actually just what I “consider”. Anythinq on the person at time of death is evidence. Period. Anybody who works with autopsies knows that. Hawaii statute specifically states that the belonqinqs of the deceased are evidence and are to be held as evidence at least until cleared by the investiqatinq authority to be released to next-of-kin. This is standard stuff. The law. Not just some “crazy conspiracist’s whacked-out expectation”. The body was supposedly put in a body baq immediately by the undertaker at the morque - exactly as the body was received. Sealed to show there was no tamperinq. And when the baq was opened she had no socks, shoes, or bracelets on. Supposedly.
But then the Police Chief says there was NO DEATH within his jurisdiction...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.