Posted on 08/23/2014 7:58:55 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
Explanation: Where should Philae land? As ESA's robotic spacecraft Rosetta circles toward Comet 67P/ Churyumov-Gerasimenko, a decision must eventually be made as to where its mechanical lander should attempt to touch-down. Reaching the comet earlier this month, Rosetta is sending back detailed pictures of the comet's unusual nucleus from which a smooth landing site will be selected. Pictured above, near the image top, the head of the comet's nucleus shows rugged grooves, while near the image bottom, the body shows a patch-work of areas sometimes separated by jagged hills. Some of the patch-work areas apparent on both the head and body seem to have fields of relatively smooth terrain. In the connecting area called the neck, however, visible across the image center, a relatively large swath of light-colored smooth terrain appears, punctuated occasionally by large boulders. Rosetta is scheduled to release Philae toward the dark mountain-sized comet nucleus with an anticipated landing date in November.
(Excerpt) Read more at 129.164.179.22 ...
I wholeheartedly agree. While I don’t think human missions to an asteroid would make sense as anything except practice for long-duration space voyages (the ultimately objective being Mars landings in the middle term, and trips to Ceres, Vesta, and Mercury in the longer term), and perhaps as good international PR, I would like to see autonomous probes traveling to and assaying all the near-Earth rocks, and larger ones that are further out.
lol
That is on way to put it
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.