Posted on 05/16/2013 12:43:34 PM PDT by MestaMachine
BENGHAZI DOT ONE, WHY THE VIDEO AND WHY AP
This began as a response to a question posed by 'just a hairy ape' on a previous thread. To fully understand Benghazi, I have to go back and break this down into parts. There was more than one reason and we need to understand them all which isn't easy,(and even less easy to explain,) because there are details long forgotten as if each 'thing' was in a box of its own separate from each other 'thing'. In reality, they are connected in a myriad of ways. So this is going to have to be a series. Step by step. Inch by inch. Slowly we turn.
This was the question that started the response. He was alluding to obama's speech at the UN where he continued to blame the video.
"So Obama was endorsing the terrorist attack against the US ?"
My response: "On a worldwide stage."
I am going to repeat this since I have been reminding people to remember how the whole video thing started.
obama was, and had been, embroiled in yet another showdown with Netanyahu. IT WAS STAGED. The dustup was that he refused to meet with Bibi at the UN. Netanyahu had already beaten obama at his own game a multitude of times and it was well known that obama hated him.
Netanyahu was in the middle of Israeli elections and the obama admin had already sent people over to do everything they could to unseat Bibi as Israel's PM. It wasn't working...not even close.
Meanwhile, obama had been searching for a way to give the third and final edict that the US was/is a muslim country. He had already done it twice in muslim countries but never on our own soil. And NOW there is yet another damning twist in this horror story.
If you want the full meal deal, bookmark this because it's only one of more to come.
Here are the mini-dots on DOT ONE.
The very first story out of the box is that the vid maker was an 'anonymous' Israeli Jewish billionaire.
But then. along came AP.
Anonymous Filmaker found by AP
The anti-Muslim film implicated in mob protests against U.S. diplomatic missions in the Mideast received logistical help from a man once convicted of financial crimes and featured actors who complained that their inflammatory dialogue was dubbed in after filming.
The self-proclaimed director of “Innocence of Muslims” initially claimed a Jewish and Israeli background.
Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, 55, told The Associated Press in an interview outside Los Angeles Wednesday that he managed logistics for the company that produced “Innocence of Muslims,” which mocked Muslims and the prophet Muhammad.
The AP located Bacile after obtaining his cellphone number from Morris Sadek, a conservative Coptic Christian in the U.S. who had promoted the anti-Muslim film in recent days on his website. Egypt’s Christian Coptic populace has long decried what they describe as a history of discrimination and occasional violence from the country’s Arab majority.
Nakoula denied he had directed the film, though he said he knew the self-described filmmaker, Sam Bacile. But the cellphone number that the AP contacted Tuesday to reach the filmmaker who identified himself as Bacile traced to the same address near Los Angeles where Nakoula was located.
Nakoula told the AP he is a Coptic Christian and supported the concerns of Christian Copts about their treatment by Muslims.
**********************************************************
As Walid Shoebat revealed however, not even that was a the truth, although the WH has never stopped claiming it. In fact, they ignored Shoebat's revelation which laid out Nakoula's entire background and exposed him as an FBI asset and a muslim.
Innocence of Muslims made by Terrorists
Shoebat ^ | 9/25/12 | Walid Shoebat
Posted on Tuesday, September 25, 2012 7:17:32 PM by Ben Barrack
Excerpt:
There is more to the story of Nakoula Basseley Nakoula than what we are told by the media. Court documents reveal that Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, producer of the movie Innocence of Muslims, partnered in a scheme with Eiad Salameh, my first cousin, a Palestinian Muslim from Beit Sahour in the Palestinian district of Bethlehem.
*****************************************************************************
NO ONE has followed up on Shoebat's assertions. Why not?
BUT NOW YOU KNOW WHY DOJ WENT HARD AND FAST AFTER AP! Because only the PLANNERS knew the identity of the vid maker. So if AP found him, they concluded that someone very high up in the planning MUST have leaked it and they were damned frantically trying to find out who. In other words, they PANICKED, and holder recused himself because he is involved in this up to his shifty eyeballs. Nakoula was a DOJ asset...so holder HAS to be involved and so far, no one has even thought to question him about Benghazi.
The WHY of the vid was to be able to claim that Israel was responsible for the planned attack on Benghazi which they knew was coming on September 11 to avenge the death of ya ya al libi which they had NO INTENTION of stopping.
They knew the word was out to hit Stevens long in advance and aquiesced to it because that is the way they have done business with al qaeda for years. WE hit a 'high value' target, and we give them one back. Does ANYONE still believe that the downed Chinook with 20 Navy SEALs on board was just a routine taliban attack?
NO.
But this time, they also had other fish to fry and david petraeus is nothing if not a fantastical fish fryer. How do you think he got to be head of the CIA in the first place?
The gunrunning out of Benghazi was his op in collusion with brennan, obama, and clinton. They were NOT simply running guns to Syria, Many of those weapons were being diverted through Turkey to the muslim brotherhood in Egypt and being smuggled across the Rafah Crossing into Gaza for use against Israel...and Israel was beginning to expose it.
THIS time they could set this up to blame Israel, make Netanyahu VERY unpopular here in the US, cost him his election, and possibly facillitate an actual all out attack on Israel by an al qaeda/mb backed army which would have cost Israel dearly in blood and treasure.
So they brought in their trusted thug at DOJ and the plan was hatched well in advance. What is worse is that it would have worked if everything had gone exactly as planned.But it didn't.
There would have been NO witnesses left alive. It would have been a complete slaughter had Ty Woods and Glen Doherty not disobeyed direct orders.
We would not be looking at cables sent begging for help. We would not know that help was not only denied on that terrible night, but that Stevens' security had been reduced to nil. I believe he knew he was going to be sacrificed. It was pretty obvious. What he probably didn't know was why.
There are ALWAYS variables you don't foresee like the Cairo Embassy apologizing to protesters before there were any, and this op had plenty more of them.
Snafu one- Woods and Doherty.
Snafu two- CNN found Chris Stevens' diary in the burnt out shell before the CIA or FBI got there.
Snafu three- AP found the video maker.
Snafu four- They decided to RUN with the original script that it was the video that caused the uprisings, but they changed it to reflect that Nakoula was a protesting Coptic Christian from Egypt.
Snafu five- Once AP found the guy, Walid Shoebat found out that his partner in crime was none other than Shoebat's own first cousin...a pa terrorist...and that Nakoula was an FBI asset.
NOW look back and recall that obama had just previously started an international argument with Netanyahu which swept the front pages of every major news outlet in the world. A deliberate snub of Netanyahu for a meeting at the UN. And yet on the very night of September 11, in the MIDDLE of the attack in Benghazi, obama calls Netanyahu and talks for an hour, unaware that the SEALs had screwed his plan. Had the op gone as planned. the morning headlines would have had Israel in their crosshairs and obama could then say he was arguing or angry with Netanyahu and THAT was the reason for the irrelevant phone call during the heat of the battle in Benghazi.
obama went to bed that night thinking about, and probably rehearsing for, his news conference about the slaughter of 41 Americans because of Israel's recklessness putting Americans in danger all over the world.
obama went to bed that night without issuing any orders whatsoever and made himself unreachable. Anyone who WANTED to do something, couldn't. The ONLY person who could have nade a difference that night was obama...and he was AWOL.
obama went to bed that night without a care in the world...and when he woke up, hell was breaking loose. So what did he do? He followed his campaign schedule because he hadn't a clue what had happened.
After they found out what had gone wrong, they stubbornly stuck to the script, proof or no proof, to give obama his day in the sun at the UN. Worse, he and clinton tried to deliberately provoke even more muslim violence to blame on the video by making a commercial ostensibly for Pakistan, but shown around the world apologizing for it where no one ever heard of it.
Well, he couldn't attack Israel. He couldn't blame Netanyahu. But he could still GLORIFY ISLAM at the UN and they kept the video story alive until he completed that task by announcing, and I quote, "The future must not belong to those who slander the HOLY prophet of Islam."
This might be one of the most evil speeches I have ever seen in my lifetime.
So now you know why the video and why AP. And I will end here because DOT TWO will be coming ASAP.
Bookmark! Looks like some interesting dots!! Will read and comment later after digesting it all.
How do we know the Nokoulas character is an FBI asset?... ‘Cause if he is, this is one huge false flag which has treasonous international overtones. In effect, this would be little barry bastard boy trying to overthrow the head of a foreign FRIENDLY government! I would put NOTHING past these treacherous democrips, but proof of the FBI asset assertion is key to this.
BTW, I made a quick copy, for the record, since this is so hot it might get zotted.
The future must not belong to those corrupt few who steal a country’s resources -- it must be won by the students and entrepreneurs, the workers and business owners who seek a broader prosperity for all people. Those are the women and men that America stands with; theirs is the vision we will support.
The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam. But to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see in the images of Jesus Christ that are desecrated, or churches that are destroyed, or the Holocaust that is denied.
I’m not saying I agree or disagree with the comment that this is an ‘evil speech’…. but context means everything when people speak.
Awesome work.
Holder went after the leaker to the AP in May of 2012.
Benghazi and the video excuse were 9/11/2012.
You were just 5 months off. Not bad for a typical conspiracy theory!
The orchestrated cover-up (just a small snippet):
1.
Hillary Clinton Speaking at a press conference from the State Department on September 13, 2012
“Let me state very clearly — and I hope it is obvious — that the United States Government had absolutely nothing to do with this video.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXYdb57P7T4
2.
Press Gaggle by Press Secretary Jay Carney — Golden, CO, 9/13/12
“As Secretary Clinton said today, the United States government had nothing to do with this movie.”
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/09/13/press-gaggle-press-secretary-jay-carney-golden-co-91312
3.
Hillary Clinton Speaks at Ceremony as Bodies of Americans Killed in Libya Arrive in the US September 14, 2012
“We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful internet video that we had nothing to do with.”
http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/09/14/transcript-video-hillary-clinton-speaks-at-ceremony-as-bodies-of-americans-killed-in-libya-arrive-in-the-us/
4.
White House spokesman Jay Carney held a press briefing September 14, 2012
“The reason why there’s unrest is because of the film. This is in response to the film… this is not a film that the United States government had anything to do with. We reject its message and its contents we find it both reprehensible.”
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/09/14/carney-anti-islam-video-completely-to-blame-for-unrest/
5.
U.S. Ambassador to the U.N., Susan Rice, goes on morning shows at NBC, ABC, CBS, FOX and CNN. September 16, 2012
Rice called the attack a “direct result of a heinous and offensive video that was widely disseminated, that the U.S. government had nothing to do with.”
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501713_162-57541739/timeline-of-comments-on-attack-on-us-consulate/
6.
Sept. 18: Obama was asked about the Benghazi attack on “The Late Show with David Letterman.”
“As offensive as this video was and, obviously, we’ve denounced it and the United States government had nothing to do with it.
http://factcheck.org/2012/10/benghazi-timeline/
7.
President Barack Obama’s speech to the UN General Assembly — full text September 25, 2012
“That is what we saw play out the last two weeks, as a crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world. I have made it clear that the United States government had nothing to do with this video”
http://www.timesofisrael.com/president-barack-obamas-speech-to-the-un-general-assembly-full-text/
Is it possible that Nakoula is being silenced by being kept in jail on bogus parole violation charges because it was the CIA or another agency that took his video and OVER DUBBED IT WITH ANTI-MOHAMMED LANGUAGE so they could then blame the YouTube video for Benghazi?
Is Nakoula a CIA operative? Is he just an innocent casualty in a gov't cover-up?
I'll read again.. Intense stuff.
P.S. I recall one of the actresses in this video said there was never any anti-Mohammed language in the movie script.
Please add me to the ping list. Thanks!
‘ll need to digest this more but I think you’re pretty much on target here.
The questions going through my head now are:
Has anyone laid eyes on Nakoula since he got locked up?
Has he been deposed?
Has he been ‘disappeared’?
Another thing still wandering loose in my head is the issue of whether Brennan was running his own op on behalf of the Troika - Obama, Axelrod, Jarrett - that Petreus didn’t have on his radar screen. I can believe Petreus was in on the arms deals but the hostage scheme would have been Brennan. I base this only on my feel for the characters of the two men.
Cover-up for a staged hostage-taking of Stevens, gone bad when the SEALs disobeyed orders to stand down.
There’s a huge hole in this theory. And that is that Obama would look good after a slaughter of our people in Benghazi and that the trading of the blind sheik would rectify that.
He would have lost the election if such a slaughter had occurred. Romney would have eaten him alive and the American people would have seen the truth.
Conspiracies just aren’t containable in regards to secrecy. I don’t doubt the gun running, and Stevens was a necessary casualty of keeping it secret. That explains the Turkish Embassador, and the Turkish Prime Minister being in DC now.
CONTAINMENT
IMHO, it seems likely that elements of the US government were involved in video from its inception and through its use as PR / propaganda.
It’s just too plainly idiotic, the whole video scenario.
And if you really search contemporaneous news sources, I’m sure you’ll find the video being reported just too stinkin’ early on to not have been put out there by the government.
The government has an “ongoing investigation” into what happened for weeks, but the day of the attack and the demonstrations elsewhere, almost instantaneously the video was a topic of news reporting ? It stinks.
mark
Context is important when HONEST people speak. But when you know someone lies to you repeatedly, then you do not give them the benefit of the doubt just because they may have included flowering sounding phrases amongst the lies. Little barry absatrd boy was spewing lies and false claims in that UN speech. Among those lies and decpetions he sprinkled a few flowery sounding phrases, probably meant to do just what it appears they have done, fool some into believing he is sincere and trying to bring equitable peace. He is in reality pushing the Caliphate.
Bent willie was not trying to assist the establishment of a Moose Slime Caliphate, whereas this devil in the White Hut IS under instructions to do just that!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.