To: annieokie; penelopesire; maggief; Protect the Bill of Rights; thouworm; SE Mom; Nachum; onyx; ...
Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise.
To: MestaMachine
Bookmark! Looks like some interesting dots!! Will read and comment later after digesting it all.
3 posted on
05/16/2013 12:51:34 PM PDT by
penelopesire
(TIME FOR OBAMA TO ANSWER FOR BENGHAZI UNDER OATH!!)
To: MestaMachine
How do we know the Nokoulas character is an FBI asset?... ‘Cause if he is, this is one huge false flag which has treasonous international overtones. In effect, this would be little barry bastard boy trying to overthrow the head of a foreign FRIENDLY government! I would put NOTHING past these treacherous democrips, but proof of the FBI asset assertion is key to this.
4 posted on
05/16/2013 1:00:31 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
(Being deceived can be cured.)
To: MestaMachine
BTW, I made a quick copy, for the record, since this is so hot it might get zotted.
5 posted on
05/16/2013 1:01:18 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
(Being deceived can be cured.)
To: MestaMachine
Please add me to the ping list. Thanks!
13 posted on
05/16/2013 1:17:29 PM PDT by
Amntn
To: MestaMachine
Thanks for all your hard work. I truly appreciate your insight.
46 posted on
05/16/2013 3:30:30 PM PDT by
crosslink
(Moderates should play in the middle of a busy street)
To: MestaMachine
Very interesting reading and much of this jives with some of the apparent observations that came in the aftermath of Sept 11, 2012
. The quickness that the news reports were jumping on information about the video that seemed to get fed to them way way too fast (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlUFuX_9dwA), the weird statements that the government had nothing to do with this video, the repetition of the lines ad naseam about the despicable video and they are going to get the person who did it
none of this passes the smell test. It looks way overdone, contrived, staged and manipulated and unnatural.
Here is my question for you
. A few of the emails between the White House, State Dept and the CIA have now been released and from the latest that Ive heard, none of these make reference to the video. If this whole thing has unfolded in the way that you are suggesting, dont you think that they would have been devious enough to include some references to the video in their emails? How could they have missed this? My understanding is that none of the emails released is in the timeframe of the 67 hour period after the attack
.I suppose if some of these eventually get released, we may find out something different.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson