Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Symphony of science: The Quantum World
YouTube ^ | September 2011 | John D Boswell

Posted on 05/27/2012 9:45:37 PM PDT by Windflier

A musical investigation into the nature of atoms and subatomic particles, the jiggly things that make up everything we see. Featuring Morgan Freeman, Stephen Hawking, Michio Kaku, Brian Cox, Richard Feynman, and Frank Close.

"The Quantum World" is the eleventh installment in the ongoing Symphony of Science music video series.

Track back to source website: Symphony of Science


TOPICS: Music/Entertainment; Science
KEYWORDS: music; physics; science; stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
A beautifully entertaining presentation of the concept of quantum physics. Check it out. I really think you'll like it.
1 posted on 05/27/2012 9:45:49 PM PDT by Windflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

One for string theory ping list.


2 posted on 05/27/2012 9:55:24 PM PDT by Captain Beyond (The Hammer of the gods! (Just a cool line from a Led Zep song))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

“I really think you’ll like it.”

Thanks for trying, but I could not get past the first 30 sec. of the MTV presentation.

I’m too old, I guess, or dumb or senile.


3 posted on 05/27/2012 9:58:41 PM PDT by BwanaNdege (Man has often lost his way, but modern man has lost his address - Gilbert K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: berdie

later


4 posted on 05/27/2012 10:03:49 PM PDT by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
12 particles of matter, 4 forces of nature.... And perzactly how many dimentions?

Cute video, and I'll use it with my grandsons. But it doesn't take me any closer to really understanding quantum physics.

/johnny

5 posted on 05/27/2012 10:04:15 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper

Lolan I wouldn’t worry about that if I were you. There are probably only a dozen people on the planet who really understand QM. And that”s being generous...


6 posted on 05/27/2012 10:17:05 PM PDT by piytar (The predator-class is furious that their prey are shooting back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
Yeah, I have misgivings about this kind of thing, because after all it is presented as revealed knowledge, rather than simple understanding.

I was greatly impressed years ago by an essay of Victor Weisskopf's, Of Atoms, Mountains, and Stars: A study in Qualitative Physics. It's pretty technical actually, but the gist of it was to emphasize the way that quantum laws present themselves to us in the way they shape the qualities of our everyday world, which qualities we are prone to accept as "givens" without questioning their origin. For example, he explores the question, "Why can we see objects?"

There's stuff that I remembered being in there that I don't see, looking at it now. Perhaps these were my own interpolations. For example, the quantum nature of substances, e.g. water. Water has very particular and exact properties everywhere we find it. This is alluded to where he says, "Specific shapes had no justification in the classical physics of particles; quantum mechanics introduced this morphic trait, which is connected with the existence of quantum states with well-defined properties." Yes, I think that's what I remember.

As I said, I was greatly impressed with all this, and I always think of it as a counterpoint to the "exalted stardust" rhetoric. Consider ye well aluminum foil!

7 posted on 05/27/2012 10:36:34 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
Auto tune and a drum machine ... Who says disco is dead? This is it's zombie cousin.

Listen to some Beethoven, Mozart, or even The Rivingtons - Papa Oom Mow Mow 2:23

8 posted on 05/27/2012 10:40:06 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist ("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piytar

That’s very true. I’m one of them.

Well, in another parallel universe. ;)


9 posted on 05/27/2012 10:45:29 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
...it doesn't take me any closer to really understanding quantum physics.

No, it doesn't, but that's not the point of the video. The point is to communicate the beauty and wonder of our universe.

I believe that aesthetics is a carrier wave that can provide a bridge for people to explore something as complex as quantum physics. Think of how people in the latter half of the 20th century were inspired to reach for the stars because of the influence of writers of science fiction.

I played a few of these videos for a couple of my kids, and they were spellbound. The artist created an effect on them, and stimulated their interest. I think that's a good thing :-)

10 posted on 05/27/2012 10:51:42 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist
The kids are disco dancing, they're tired of rock and roll.
Don't bother telling them that drum machine ain't got no soul.

... sorry about the ad !

11 posted on 05/27/2012 10:55:19 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BwanaNdege
Thanks for trying, but I could not get past the first 30 sec. of the MTV presentation. I’m too old, I guess, or dumb or senile.

I'm pushing 60 myself, and I understand.

The music isn't necessarily my favored genre, but it's tastefully done, and the artist succeeds at making beautiful lyrics out of the recorded statements of well-known scientists.

12 posted on 05/27/2012 10:56:10 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Ping


13 posted on 05/27/2012 11:02:02 PM PDT by razorback-bert (I'm in shape. Round is a shape isn't it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piytar
There are probably only a dozen people on the planet who really understand QM.

Feynman always said it was a mistake to try and understand it. If you did, you would "go down the drain into a blind alley, from which no one has ever escaped." You just have to accept it.

14 posted on 05/27/2012 11:02:42 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew
Present something to my grandsons as 'revealed knowlege' and expect to be field stripped and hanged out to dry.

It was a cute vid, and useful for the 3 to 5 Y.O. crowd that needs that kind of hip stuff.

/johnny

15 posted on 05/27/2012 11:14:31 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
I'll use it with the grandkids. Don't get me wrong. But me, I'll never actually get it.

Dude, I'm a frigging cook.

/johnny

16 posted on 05/27/2012 11:16:31 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
Aesthetcs does count. And my grandbabies will enjoy what I don't particularly.

But you are talking to a man that couldn't get past matrix form of finite differences on numeric integration.

Cooking school only goes so far. And I took it as far as I can go.

Would you like fries with that? ;)

/johnny

17 posted on 05/27/2012 11:33:16 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
...me, I'll never actually get it. Dude, I'm a frigging cook.

Yeah, but you know things about the culinary sciences that blow me away :-)

I don't understand quantum physics either, but I'm not even trying. I just find the basic concepts fascinating. Like a lot of other scientific subjects that I'll never be fluent with.

18 posted on 05/27/2012 11:36:26 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
I am so going to use that video with the grandbabies, though.

And when it's over, I'm going to ask them how many dimensions it requires.

We'll see what the results are.

/johnny

19 posted on 05/27/2012 11:51:41 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist
Listen to some Beethoven, Mozart

From a PBS Nova special titled, "Time Travel"...

NARRATOR: The leader in this field, Raymond Chiao, has misgivings about Nimtz's interpretations, but even he agrees with part of what Nimtz is saying.

PROF. RAYMOND CHIAO (University of California): In our experiments we have measured that a single photon can tunnel across a tunnel barrier at 1.7 times the speed of light.

NARRATOR: Chiao agrees that quantum mechanical tunnelling allows occasional random photons to break the light speed limit. What upsets him, and the rest of the physics world, is that Nimtz claims to have used it to send information faster than light. That really is taboo.

RAYMOND CHIAO: To have a genuine signal you really have to control the signal, but in, in quantum mechanical tunnelling it's a completely random process. Fundamentally we cannot, we cannot send information with this tunnelling particle.

GUENTER NIMTZ: Yeah, some colleagues are claiming that you cannot send information and then we started to transmit Mozart 40 and this is for instance the original tape. That's what we sent at a speed of 4.7 times the velocity of light and a distance of about 14 centimetre. Whether you can recognize Mozart 40 or not...

NARRATOR: Despite the random nature of the process, Mozart seems to have got through.

RAYMOND CHIAO: The essential question is: what is a signal, or what constitutes information? Has he really sent a signal in the sense of information faster than the speed of light? This is where Professor Nimtz and I part company because we don't really have a rigorous definition of what is information at the quantum level.

GUENTER NIMTZ: Maybe that this is not information for American colleague, but for a German or a British colleague. I think Mozart 40 has some information in it.

(GERMAN)

NARRATOR: Whilst well established in his own field, Nimtz is new to tunnelling and claiming to send Mozart faster than light has brought him perilously close to being called crackpot. His critics cite signal fronts and carrier waves. He counters with a limited bandwidth, but so far he stands alone.

Right or wrong, this leads to an interesting thought experiment, a gerdanken experiment in German. What if you could tunnel a message to the other side of the universe? Going faster than light, the message would
seem to go backwards in time.

http://www.astronomy.net/forums/blackholes2/messages/4289.shtml?show=top

20 posted on 05/27/2012 11:52:05 PM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson