Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Sarah Palin Really Said About A “Drop Dead” Date
A Time for Choosing ^ | October 1, 2011 | Gary P Jackson

Posted on 10/01/2011 2:13:02 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

By Gary P Jackson

The media and anti-Palin forces [many times one and the same] went nuts on Friday when Sarah Palin didn’t announce her candidacy for President of the United States. As the day went on, it became quite comical.

Never mind that Sarah, who appeared Thursday evening on Fox Business News’s Freedom Watch, told the viewers she wouldn’t be announcing on Friday and was holding her cards close to the vest.

I’m always amazed that people think Sarah should lay her cards on the table, spell out exactly what she intends to do to win the presidency. Would you expect a general going to war to tell the enemy what his plan of attack would be? Err, no. Nor would any other candidate be asked to do this.

At this point in time, Sarah has no reason not to tell her millions of supporters if she’s not running. Nothing to gain. That said, a candidate who is planning an unconventional campaign, one like she’s successfully ran before [the Alaska governor's race] would certainly keep her entire strategery to herself until it was time to act.

Getting back to the point. Somehow answers Sarah Palin has given in interviews have turned into hard dates that Sarah herself has never set. In fact, she’s been purposely vague about hard dates, only kinda-sorta agreeing with the reporters asking the questions. The only hard and fast dates Sarah has ever talked about were the legal filing deadlines. Those are the only “drop dead” dates she’s specified.

We went back to an interview Sarah did with David Brody and the Iowa State Fair in August, that is representative of the interviews she’s done that have asked “the question.”

Palin: There is still a lot of contemplation that goes on within a family, deciding whether to engage in such a life-changing venture, putting yourself forward in the name of service, in such a position as President of the United States. So, we’re still thinking about it, and the impact on family.

Family comes first in my life, and I just don’t want to adversely affect the family. So, we’re still talking about it, thinking about it. And that’s what I want supporters to understand.

At the same time, I want to be very fair to supporters and not keep them hanging on in perpetuity. It’s fair to them to give them an answer here, in short order, so that they can jump on board with someone else, and/or to decide for themselves what they want to do. So, still haven’t made up my mind, haven’t decided when that announcement would be yet.

David Brody: Is that short order by the end of September? October?

Palin: I think that that is a fair timeline for people, because Fall time, they can start getting engaged with different campaigns, but still thinking about it, and really, really desiring to be a participant in the positive change that needs to happen in this country.

Economy getting back on the right track. Jobs created for Americans. I want to be a part of that, whether it be as a candidate, or as a supporter of the right candidate. I’m still in that decision making phase.

As highlighted, the answer is the end of September or the end of October.

See the entire interview here.

If people and the media want to take the time, they can go back and look at interviews that talk about a timeline, and they all go about the same.

What is most curious is how it’s the anti-Palin people who are all wee-wee’ed up because Sarah Palin hasn’t announced yet. Her supporters couldn’t care less when she announces as long as she announces!

What is also curious to me is it’s been guys like Mitch Daniels, Mike Huckabee, Rick Perry, and now Chris Christie who have played the “is you is, or is you ain’t” game, teasing their fans by saying they might, then the won’t, then they might run. [with Perry actually getting in, after promising Texans he would serve his full term as Govern on numerous occasions]

And yet, it’s Sarah Palin, who has always been consistent in her answers to questions about a possible run, who is the “tease.” You’d almost think there was some sort of agenda at work!

What’s interesting to me, is with all of the problems of the world, the Obama scandals [Fast and Furious, Solyndra, etc.] the crappy economy, terrorism, and everything else the media should be covering, they are spending their time worried about a woman they claim is insignificant, and could never win, is up to.

The constant hand-wringing over Sarah Palin betrays their fear. Sarah Palin lives rent free in all of their heads.

That’s probably why it’s going to be so enjoyable to watch her beat them all.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: palin; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: BuckeyeTexan

AWYHO.


41 posted on 10/01/2011 3:45:31 PM PDT by sanjuanbob (Festina Lente)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Da Bilge Troll
Sarah has no reason not to tell her millions of supporters if she’s not running.

Am I the only one who really read that sentence?

If she has no reason not to tell her supporters if she's not running, then whose side is this guy on? Actually, I think he's just such a poor writer he got tangled up in his double negatives.

Sarah can wait till next August if she wants and I still might support her -- it's her supporters' hysteria and the personality cult developing around her that annoy me. They've started to remind me of another group who slavishly supported a candidate back in 2008.

And I think they're hurting her in the long run.

42 posted on 10/01/2011 3:46:42 PM PDT by BfloGuy (Given enough time, the primary function of any bureaucracy becomes the employment of its employees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk

She can plainly see it as if she was traveling to play basketball at another town against a team with rigged players, on steroids, some with sex changes and officials all on the take.

***

Running a 100M dash against kids with moustaches when I was in the 6th (7th?) grade.

I did that.


43 posted on 10/01/2011 3:47:25 PM PDT by ROTB (Christian sin breeds enemies for the USA. If you're a Christian, stop sinning, and spread the Word..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

All lies by the LSM and you breathlessly blubber, what?


44 posted on 10/01/2011 3:48:47 PM PDT by Sea Parrot (Democrats creation of the entitlement class will prove out to be their very own Frankenstein monster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Thou shalt not speak evil of thy fellow Republican.

- Ronald Reagan

right?


45 posted on 10/01/2011 3:48:47 PM PDT by ROTB (Christian sin breeds enemies for the USA. If you're a Christian, stop sinning, and spread the Word..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal

Then why do you lament over it?


46 posted on 10/01/2011 3:50:06 PM PDT by Sea Parrot (Democrats creation of the entitlement class will prove out to be their very own Frankenstein monster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

U need to read my post #14 link. It will make u laugh.


47 posted on 10/01/2011 3:50:13 PM PDT by FreeInWV (Have you had enough change yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

LOL, all have lost interest, except Lazlo in PA, and the other Palin ankle biters on FR as to when.


48 posted on 10/01/2011 3:53:10 PM PDT by Sea Parrot (Democrats creation of the entitlement class will prove out to be their very own Frankenstein monster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FreeInWV

I have a link to that speech but haven’t read the whole thing. Maybe I can later.


49 posted on 10/01/2011 3:53:59 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ROTB

Right. I haven’t spoken evil of her. You must have misunderstood me.


50 posted on 10/01/2011 3:56:00 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

My hunch is she never seriously planned a run, but kept her options open.


Everyone can have a hunch/opinion about her intent, etc. She still has some time to make it known and until that time passes that time is hers to use as she deems fit. It maybe best for all that she get in and let the cards fall where they may. That way the electorate will have a chance to accept or reject her during the campaign season. Whether she is accepted or rejected that’s okay. Life will go on and we still have major things to reverse in our gov’t both nationally and locally. JMO....

Take care.


51 posted on 10/01/2011 4:03:20 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty
Having been a father, I really don’t like the graphics of children crying.

So, you're a victim here?

52 posted on 10/01/2011 4:12:52 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them." --Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: FreeInWV
If the primary schedule were the same as 1980, I would certainly agree with you. However, as it currently stands, two states (FL and SC) have filing dates that close within the next 31 days, and both are states she would be likely to win, which would give her a leg up on the field. OK, Utah is the first to close on 10/14, but that's no big deal.

Ir looks like 10/30 or 31 is it.

Then, too, she doesn't have to formally announce, just file....which amounts to the very same thing. Considering the investigative powers of the legacy media these days, it might be 11/13 before they realize that she actually IS in the race!

53 posted on 10/01/2011 4:14:36 PM PDT by fantail 1952
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: fantail 1952
Then, too, she doesn't have to formally announce, just file....which amounts to the very same thing. Considering the investigative powers of the legacy media these days, it might be 11/13 before they realize that she actually IS in the race!

Now THAT would be funny! Can you imaging the heads that would be exploding to find out that she's been running all along, but just under the radar! I doubt it, but it would be funny as heck!

54 posted on 10/01/2011 4:32:45 PM PDT by JaguarXKE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
Sure, she just can't be counted on to keep her job, what with her quitting her governor's gig mid term and cashing in on her celebrity.

* rolls eyes*

It was more like three quarters of the way through it, and the people of AK, when asked at the time, understood her decision completely. None of the plans she'd made, and on which she'd campaigned, were abandoned, because of her exit. Her Lt. Governor picked up right where she left off.

55 posted on 10/01/2011 4:33:30 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

I saw that! I would say he is not a fan.


56 posted on 10/01/2011 4:42:37 PM PDT by mtnwmn (Liberalism leads to Socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
"Sure, she just can't be counted on to keep her job, what with her quitting her governor's gig mid term and cashing in on her celebrity."

Drives you nuts, doesn't it? That pretty lady, so successful, every word repeated a hundred times by the media, making millions...

...and now she's going to be the most powerful person in the Free World.

LMAO!!!! Gag on it!

8^D

57 posted on 10/01/2011 4:47:57 PM PDT by Gargantua (Sarah Palin's coming, and she's bringing "flyover country" with her!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

No. Don’t be a dick. Post whatever the Hell you want. Why don’t you post a pic of somebody being drawn and quartered. Cooool!


58 posted on 10/01/2011 4:49:03 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (I like both Perry and Palin, and will vote for whichever of them wins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty
You're the one who played the victim card.

As a father, I find the picture endearing.

Reminds me of when my daughters were small.

59 posted on 10/01/2011 4:51:10 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them." --Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
She met with, and lined up, the biggest GOP money bags in existence back in June and July (Tennessee, South Carolina, and Florida). Everyone seems to keep forgetting this little nugget. The GOP cognoscenti know of whom I speak.

Sarah Palin is coming, and she's bringing The TEA Party with her!

8^D

60 posted on 10/01/2011 4:51:36 PM PDT by Gargantua (Sarah Palin's coming, and she's bringing "flyover country" with her!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson