Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Pyramids were built by leadership skills, not slavery'
Press Trust of India ^ | May 23, 2011 | Staff Reporter

Posted on 05/28/2011 12:36:29 PM PDT by decimon

It was the leadership skills of the rulers and not the bondage of slavery that motivated the labourers to toil hard in building the ancient Egyptian pyramids, claims a top leadership guru.

Indonesia-based Arthur Carmazzi will soon come out with a book arguing how the leadership skills of the rulers of Egypt were responsible for building the giant structures regarded as one of the Seven Wonders of the World.

"Various researches have already shown that the labourers were not slaves. It was more about getting work done through leadership skills, rather than by slavery and exploitation. Even today we look at those tombs with amazement as to how they were built in the ancient ages. In my book, I will discuss how the labourers were motivated," Carmazzi told PTI here.

The best-selling author and leadership trainer was in the city recently to give a motivational lecture for a fundraising event of Calcutta Park Street Round Table 34.

To be released this August, the book titled 'Team Leadership Lessons from the Great Pyramids' will have case studies on how the builders treated the workers, how they tried to build up a rapport with their large workforce and how they ultimately won their trust.

"It is very interesting to learn how even thousands of years ago, when even the word management was not born, the rulers got their task done by applying leadership skills effectively. It is an excellent example of what difference can leadership skills make," said Carmazzi, ranked as one of the top ten most influential Global Leadership Gurus by Gurus International.

(Excerpt) Read more at ptinews.com ...


TOPICS: History; Society
KEYWORDS: arthurcarmazzi; arthurfcarmazzi; doubletalk; exploitation; godsgravesglyphs; indonesia; pages; semantics; slavery; totalbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: Laissez-faire capitalist

It wasn’t leadership skills or slavery—it was Religion that built the Pyramids. Those who worked on the monuments got better food, all the beer they could drink, pizza like food, the best medical care in the world (at that time). Workers didn’t have to pay taxes. Last but not least—they got Eternal Life! That’s a big deal! The Pharaoh promised he would remember them in the life to come—Everyone who worked on the monuments would party with the Gods in the Life-To-Come in the land of the west. Not a bad deal. I believe that by accident, the Ancient Egyptians created a national identity. Villagers from all over labored together for 3 months a year, talked and got to know each other—they were no longer just inhabitants of a village or State (nome) but Egyptians. Their unity helped their nation become one of the richest in the Ancient World.


41 posted on 05/28/2011 3:29:43 PM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wildbill

;’)


42 posted on 05/28/2011 3:31:05 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Well said. Also, the fact that there was a gov’t village near the construction site where lots of beer and bread was made doesn’t make the labor not slavery — slaves had to be fed, and the food was made by still other slaves. Imagine how great it must have felt to get a job making bread all day instead of hauling crap up ramps.


43 posted on 05/28/2011 3:35:06 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch

Weird coincidence. ;’)


44 posted on 05/28/2011 3:35:20 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

That was in “Ben Hur”. :’)


45 posted on 05/28/2011 3:36:51 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

[singing] The Israelites...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2239286/posts


46 posted on 05/28/2011 3:39:09 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Thanks Cincinna for this link -- http://www.friendsofitamar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: decimon

AND religion...albeit an antiquidated, false religion, but still, religion.


47 posted on 05/28/2011 3:40:58 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

It boils down to enmity toward the Biblical account, as far as disputing the nature of labor utilized to build the pyramids in ancient Egypt. What, were they supposed to be some sort of proto-GenX slackers, working 20 hours a week and kayaking the Nile the rest of the time?

Bondage and servitude was a fact of life for many and even sometimes the majority up to at least the 19th century, and still is in much of the world. We live in a time and a place with no slavery, which is a rare luxury and in fact an oddity in the grand sweep of history.


48 posted on 05/28/2011 3:42:33 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
Indonesia-based Arthur Carmazzi will soon come out with a book arguing how the leadership skills of the rulers of Egypt were responsible for building the giant structures regarded as one of the Seven Wonders of the World.

No wonder this guy is based in Asia. The Chinese et al. slave masters must love his theories. (= big $$$ for good old Artie.)

49 posted on 05/28/2011 3:47:50 PM PDT by Moltke (Always retaliate first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
To add to my previous comment: This has nothing to do with the pyramids or ancient Egypt. It's a thinly veiled ploy to justify/facilitate Chinese/East Asian business practices of TODAY. JMHO, of course.

Carmazzi, ranked as one of the top ten most influential Global Leadership Gurus by Gurus International.

LOL. See what I mean?

50 posted on 05/28/2011 4:03:10 PM PDT by Moltke (Always retaliate first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Even more likely, the work was accomplished by various contractors who had specific specialties and were hired to accomplish the tasks at which they were expert.

The simple solution is the likely solution.


51 posted on 05/28/2011 4:04:41 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 ....( History is a process, not an event ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Is to day April 1?


52 posted on 05/28/2011 4:06:22 PM PDT by chickenlips
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
The Root is the Latin word "Villa": a country dwelling.

LOL - Not quite. That's a very colloquial late Latin usage. The word villa, from the Indo-European "weik", actually means farm.

And the concept of the villein, technically a freeman owing labour service to his Lord as rent for his land, only arrived with the Normans.

The word "villein" is from the Latin "villanus", which originally meant farm worker, but which later (after Diocletian) came to mean serf, and serfs are what villeins in Britain were. They were not a free man paying rent with their labor. They were not free to leave.

The word probably came to Britain with the Romans. They certainly practiced serfdom. Neither the word nor the legal institution were introduced by the Normans though. Villeinage was already well established among the Saxons. The Normans certainly continued it though.

53 posted on 05/28/2011 4:24:01 PM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Boy do you know how to misread everything. Like you got a chip or something waiting on it to be knocked off.

Misread what?  This?  It points to a single class of people who appear to have arrived as free people, overstayed their welcome, and ended up as slaves.

I don't recall reading in the Bible that the Isrealites/Jews overstayed their welcome.  Could you please refresh my memory, and inform me where that exact text is located?

The Isrealites/Jews moved to Egypt, were accepted there and lived there peacably.  A new ruler came to power that didn't like the Jews.  We've seen that happen in modern times too.  Should we just reference the modern day Jews as overstaying their welcome too?  Just how long should Israelites/Jews be able to stay in a region before they have to move on to avoid hardship, slavery, persecution, and death?  I'm sure modern day Jews would appreciate the heads-up.

Don't get into a contest with anyone on the net about who is more Jewish BTW. You'd be surprised.

My biggest surprise would be, that someone doesn't know didly about their ancestry.  Where did you come up with this tripe?

In a lightly populated world where you could just run down the river a few miles and totally disappear slavery would be a difficult institution to maintain. Imagining that Egypt could be run as a gigantic slave camp is bizarre.

And yet, the pharoh was told to 'let my people go', and he didn't.  In fact he became so angy with them that he cut in half the supply of straw for the making of bricks, and demanded they keep up production levels or else.  So how easy was it in those days for people to just run down the river a few miles and totally disappear?  Evidently, your glib comments and the reality of the day don't match up.

The basic story is the Hebrews went to Egypt. They stayed 400 some years. They ended up enslaved. They rebelled. They left. Pharoah drowned.

Well, I may not be Jewish, but the story of Joseph, his success at winning the Pharoh and God's favor, Moses, the plagues, the Passover night, a Pharoh's promise to let God's children go, and a renegging of that promise, and
God Himself interceeded on behalf of his chosen people wouldn't get such short shrift in my non-revisionist version.

Judaism begins with MOSES according to some, yet others argue that it begins with ABRAHAM. Take your pick.

Whether Judasim officialy begins at either point, it's still God's people we're talking about here.  I'm not going to talk about them overstaying their welcome.  That is just ridiculous.

NOBODY ELSE in Egypt is identified as having been enslaved at that time.

Yep, that's right.

Nothing short of God's personal intervention could break the Isrealites free from Egypt.  That's why I read your comment with such dismay.  Some of them are unhinged from the Biblical account.

The only record we have of the Israelites actually leaving, led to the army of Egypt led by the Pharoh following in hot persuit after them.  Thus, your account of how easy it would be to escape slavery in ancient Egypt left my jaw on the floor.

You and I probably have a lot closer understanding of what took place than our conversation here intimates, but wow fella, you're comments sure don't reflect it.

54 posted on 05/28/2011 4:56:16 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Tell me you haven't asked yourself what mistake Obama made, that wound up causing Laden's death?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Yet, Pharoah let them go ~ whoever they were ~ and they went.

He did that because their presence bothered him ~ 'cause, among other things, plagues of frogs were sent, the first-born were killed, people got boils, the river ran red, .......

Someday you just gotta' read the whole story!

55 posted on 05/28/2011 4:58:47 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: decimon

I believe that’s a much better response than slamming the idea that Israelite slavery existed at all.

Weren’t the larger pyramids dating back as far as 2,000bc anyway? (Actually I just looked it up. The Egyptian hay day of Pyramid building started around 2,700 bc and lasted about 1,000 years, until about 1,700 bc.)

I appreciate the response. I read too much into the pyramid/Israelite connection as it relates to the slavery Biblical accounts (issue).


56 posted on 05/28/2011 5:06:37 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Tell me you haven't asked yourself what mistake Obama made, that wound up causing Laden's death?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Another leadership/management book from a dumbass, yawn.


57 posted on 05/28/2011 5:10:28 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

The whole army of Egypt was sent out to bring back the Israelites, with the Pharaoh at their helm, and you term this as Pharaoh letting them go. Then you tell me, I need to read the whole account?

Wow.

The Pharaoh had seen ten plagues leveled on his people. His own son had been struck down during Passover night. Even then he hardened his heart and refused to let the Israelites remain free. This you refer to as him letting them go, as if it was a done deal.

If so, then how is it that he wound up on the bottom of the Red Sea being destroyed with the army of Egypt?

Later...


58 posted on 05/28/2011 5:11:57 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Tell me you haven't asked yourself what mistake Obama made, that wound up causing Laden's death?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Hey, in the story in the Bible, if not Cecil B. D'Mille, the Pharoah lets them go, then changes his mind and goes after them where he is drowned.

Interesting story about a large chamber discovered several decades ago that was full of mummies of the time. Later research proves that all the royals but Seti were present. He was missing.

Many analysts argue Seti is the pharoah who drowned which neatly explains his absence.

But yes, read carefully, he lets them go and reneges. Hence he is destroyed by God.

That's another one of those yin-yan things in the Bible. In the end all is complete and there are no loose ends.

BTW, this is a story about a large group that was tributary to the Egyptian ruler. Sure, it's slavery, but it wasn't individual mano y mano slavery ~ think of it more like the Iroquois among the Hurons. They paid in corn and dogs. Then, one day, they ran away to Central New York, climbed to the tops of the highest hills and dared the Huron to come after them.

The Hebrews were paying tribute in bricks.

59 posted on 05/28/2011 5:20:34 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: decimon
That's exactly what an old boss told me when I said I wasn't a slave but a leader. He said I should lead myself to a stack of lumber and lead the re-stacking of it properly.
60 posted on 05/28/2011 5:24:37 PM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson