Skip to comments.
Support for Dark Energy
Centauri Dreams ^
| 5/20/11
| Paul Gilster
Posted on 05/21/2011 3:00:25 PM PDT by LibWhacker
Support for Dark Energy
by Paul Gilster on May 20, 2011
The far future may be a lonely place, at least in extragalactic terms. Scientists studying gravitys interactions with so-called dark energy — thought to be the cause of the universes accelerating expansion — can work out a scenario in which gravity dominated in the early universe. But somewhere around eight billion years after the Big Bang, the continuing expansion and consequent dilution of matter caused gravity to fall behind dark energy in its effects. Were left with what we see today, a universe whose expansion will one day spread galaxies so far apart that any civilizations living in them wont be able to see any other galaxies.
The initial dark energy findings, released in 1998, were based on Type Ia supernovae, using these as standard candles which allowed us to calculate their distance from Earth. Now we have new data from both the Galaxy Evolution Explorer satellite (drawing on a three-dimensional map of galaxies in the distant universe containing hundreds of millions of galaxies) and the Anglo-Australian Telescope (Siding Spring Mountain, Australia). Using this information, scientists are studying the pattern of distance between individual galaxies. Here we have not a standard candle but a standard ruler, based on the tendency of pairs of galaxies to be separated by roughly 490 million light years.
A standard ruler is an astronomical object whose size is known to an approximate degree, one that can be used to determine its distance from the Earth by measuring its apparent size in the sky. The new dark energy investigations used a standard ruler based on galactic separation. Scientists believe that acoustic pressure waves frozen in place approximately 370,000 years after the Big Bang (the result of electrons and protons combining to form neutral hydrogen) define the separation of galaxies we see. The pressure waves, known as baryon acoustic oscillations, left their imprint in the patterns of galaxies, accounting for the separation of galactic pairs. This provides a standard ruler that can be used to measure the distance of galaxy pairs from the Earth — closer galaxies appear farther apart from each other in the sky.
Were looking, then, at patterns of distance between galaxies, using bright young galaxies of the kind most useful in such work. Galaxy Evolution Explorer identified the galaxies to be studied, while the Anglo-Australian Telescope was used to study the pattern of distance between them. Folding distance data into information about the speeds at which galaxy pairs are receding confirms what the supernovae studies have been telling us, that the universe’s expansion is accelerating. GALEXs ultraviolet map also shows how galactic clusters draw in new galaxies through gravity while experiencing the counterweight of dark energy, which acts to tug the clusters apart, slowing the process.
Chris Blake (Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne), lead author of recent papers on this work, says that theories that gravity is repulsive when acting at great distances (an alternative to dark energy) fail in light of the new data:
“The action of dark energy is as if you threw a ball up in the air, and it kept speeding upward into the sky faster and faster. The results tell us that dark energy is a cosmological constant, as Einstein proposed. If gravity were the culprit, then we wouldn’t be seeing these constant effects of dark energy throughout time.”
Image: This diagram illustrates two ways to measure how fast the universe is expanding. In the past, distant supernovae, or exploded stars, have been used as “standard candles” to measure distances in the universe, and to determine that its expansion is actually speeding up. The supernovae glow with the same intrinsic brightness, so by measuring how bright they appear on the sky, astronomers can tell how far away they are. This is similar to a standard candle appearing fainter at greater distances (left-hand illustration). In the new survey, the distances to galaxies were measured using a “standard ruler” (right-hand illustration). This method is based on the preference for pairs of galaxies to be separated by a distance of 490 million light-years today. The separation appears to get smaller as the galaxies move farther away, just like a ruler of fixed length (right-hand illustration). Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech.
Dark energy is still a huge unknown, but Jon Morse, astrophysics division director at NASA Headquarters in Washington, thinks the new work provides useful confirmation:
“Observations by astronomers over the last 15 years have produced one of the most startling discoveries in physical science; the expansion of the universe, triggered by the Big Bang, is speeding up. Using entirely independent methods, data from the Galaxy Evolution Explorer have helped increase our confidence in the existence of dark energy.”
For more, see Blake et al., The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: testing the cosmological model with baryon acoustic oscillations at z=0.6, accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (preprint) and Blake et al., The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: the growth rate of cosmic structure since redshift z=0.9, also accepted at MNRAS (preprint).
TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: dark; energy; support
Brilliant! The evidence mounts. I love it!
To: LibWhacker
I remember this topic being easier to understand in Sunday School. :)
2
posted on
05/21/2011 3:16:07 PM PDT
by
TenthAmendmentChampion
(Darwinism is to Genesis as Global Warming is to Revelations.)
To: LibWhacker
3
posted on
05/21/2011 3:17:44 PM PDT
by
eleni121
("All Along the Watchtower" Book of Isaiah, Chapter 21, verses 5-9)
To: LibWhacker
The only reason ‘dark energy’ and ‘dark matter’ were MADE UP by scientists was to explain why their theories about the Universe were not matching the reality of the Universe.
In the picture show at the lead of this thread, there are ‘blue’ (approaching) galaxies and ‘red’ (receding) galaxies. The BLUE are coming towards us, the RED are moving away.
YET, the Big Bang/Expansion theory says that all the galaxies are moving AWAY from us , and from each other. Why, then, are there ‘blue’ shifted galaxies?
Per this article, scientists have three things to deal with:
SIZE
DISTANCE
LUMINOSITY
If you have TWO of those factors , you can deduce the THIRD.
Scientists are using just ONE of these factors to get the other two. That means they are making an ASSUMPTION about the SECOND factor. Then they say that assumption is based on the FIRST factor.
I would say the only evidence that is mounting is that we still do not understand the makeup of the Universe very well.
4
posted on
05/21/2011 4:17:24 PM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post)
To: UCANSEE2
“In the picture show at the lead of this thread, there are blue (approaching) galaxies and red (receding) galaxies. The BLUE are coming towards us, the RED are moving away.”
The blue just aren’t moving away as fast but all are moving away.
5
posted on
05/21/2011 6:24:00 PM PDT
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: UCANSEE2; count-your-change
YET, the Big Bang/Expansion theory says that all the galaxies are moving AWAY from us , and from each other. Why, then, are there blue shifted galaxies? There is no law that forbids galaxies to have their own speed. Imagine two idle cars on a rubber band. Begin stretching the rubber band and those cars begin moving away from each other. However if you start one car and drive toward another one you can overcome the stretching of the band and approach the other car.
It is actually known that galaxies have their own speed within the Universe and they can collide.
I would say the only evidence that is mounting is that we still do not understand the makeup of the Universe very well.
Did anyone claim that we understand the makeup of the Universe very well, just well, or passably good? As far as I know, very little is known about the Universe. The criteria of declaring your knowledge to be of the "very well" grade is when you can make your own little Universes, even if they are not perfect.
6
posted on
05/21/2011 6:56:30 PM PDT
by
Greysard
To: SirKit
7
posted on
05/21/2011 8:16:11 PM PDT
by
SuziQ
To: Greysard
if you start one car and drive toward another one you can overcome the stretching of the band and approach the other car. That would imply that a galaxy, for instance, can move faster than the speed of the expansion of the Universe. Would that not violate a few laws?
Did anyone claim that we understand the makeup of the Universe very well, just well, or passably good?
Well, yes. Every day scientists proclaim some new discovery or theory that they assure is is the absolute truth.
As far as I know, very little is known about the Universe.
Then you know far more than most people.
The criteria of declaring your knowledge to be of the "very well" grade is when you can make your own little Universes, even if they are not perfect.
It's all in our heads.
8
posted on
05/24/2011 9:31:59 PM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post)
To: count-your-change
The blue just arent moving away as fast but all are moving away. Is Andromeda red or blue shifted?
9
posted on
05/24/2011 9:33:30 PM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post)
To: LibWhacker
They say the reason for dark energy and dark matter is to explain why galaxies stay ‘together’, instead of flying wildly apart.
Today there were tornadoes, some covering a path a mile wide, spinning a debris ball at speeds up to at least 150 mph.
Why did the debris circle around the tornado? There is no black hole or giant mass at the center of a tornado.
What keeps the ‘mass’ circling the tornado? What keeps stars circling the galaxy?
10
posted on
05/24/2011 9:41:01 PM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post)
To: UCANSEE2
"if you start one car and drive toward another one you can overcome the stretching of the band and approach the other car."That would imply that a galaxy, for instance, can move faster than the speed of the expansion of the Universe. Would that not violate a few laws?
Certainly not. First of all, it is possible for some objects to move faster (or slower) than the average speed of expansion of the Universe. But that is not necessary. Even if we assume that no object can move faster than the wavefront of the expansion, there is no law against moving slower. All you need for a collision is a difference in speeds.
You can achieve such a slowdown, for example, in a gravitational interaction of two galaxies. Even a small attraction would be enough to change the course, and that will result in the "forward" vector getting shorter and the "sideways" vector getting longer - leading to lateral movement of the galaxy, putting it into the path of another galaxy.
Every day scientists proclaim some new discovery or theory that they assure is is the absolute truth.
Those are not the scientists you are looking for :-)
11
posted on
05/24/2011 10:50:59 PM PDT
by
Greysard
To: UCANSEE2
“The Andromeda Galaxy is approaching the Milky Way at about 100 to 140 kilometres per second (62 to 87 mi/s) (400 lightyears every million years),[61] so it is one of the few blue-shifted galaxies” (wikipedia)
Blue. I was wrong in my former statement. Mea culpa!
12
posted on
05/25/2011 1:39:12 AM PDT
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: count-your-change
Something I learned during this was that the theory of why the galaxies collide, even though they are said to be expanding away from each other, is that it is like a cosmic entanglement. Let them get a little too close, while on adjacent trajectories, and they will tend to merge/collide/crash.
Apparently the reason they do this, is because of gravity. However, there is not enough mass in the galaxies to exert such a pull. So.... dark matter. A fudge factor for explaining a process we don’t fully understand.
13
posted on
05/25/2011 12:19:15 PM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post)
To: UCANSEE2
It really is kinda biggish out there. And a whole more complicated then assumed. Dark matter? Sounds like something that shoulda been refrigerated about a week ago.
14
posted on
05/25/2011 12:42:05 PM PDT
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson