Posted on 03/17/2011 7:00:58 AM PDT by decimon
In the business of concrete making, what's oldeven ancientis new again.
Almost 1,900 years ago, the Romans built what continues to be the world's largest unreinforced solid concrete dome in the worldthe Pantheon. The secret, probably unknown to the Emperor Hadrian's engineers at the time, was that the lightweight concrete used to build the dome had set and hardened from the inside out. This internal curing process enhanced the material's strength, durability, resistance to cracking, and other properties so that the Pantheon continues to be used for special events to this day.
But it is only within the last decade or so that internally cured concrete has begun to have an impact on modern world infrastructure. Increasingly, internally cured concrete is being used in the construction of bridge decks, pavements, parking structures, water tanks, and railway yards, according to a review* of the current status of the new (or old) concrete technology just published by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
The virtues of internally cured concrete stem from substituting light-weight, pre-wetted absorbent materials for some of the sand and/or coarse aggregates (stones) that are mixed with cement to make conventional concrete. Dispersed throughout the mixture, the water-filled lightweight aggregates serve as reservoirs that release water on an as-needed basis to nearby hydrating cement particles.
According to one study cited in the review, bridge decks made with internally cured, high-performance concrete were estimated to have a service life of 63 years, as compared with 22 years for conventional concrete and 40 years for high-performance concrete without internal curing.
"As with many new technologies, the path from research to practice has been a slow one, but as of 2010, hundreds of thousands of cubic meters" of the lighter and more durable material have been successfully used in U.S. construction, write the report's co-authors, NIST chemical engineer Dale Bentz and Jason Weiss, Purdue University civil engineering professor.
Compared with conventional varieties, internally cured concrete increases the cost of a project by 10 to 12 percent, Bentz and Weiss estimate on the basis of bridge-building projects in New York and Indiana. The increased front-end cost, they write, must be evaluated against the reduced risk of cracking, better protection against salt damage, and other improved properties that "should contribute to a more durable structure that has a longer life and lower life-cycle costs," they write. "Further, this could have substantial benefits in a reduced disruption to the traveling public, generally producing a more sustainable solution."
The 82-page report summarizes the current practice and theory of internal curing, reviews project experiences and material performance in the field, and describes opportunities for research that could lead to enhancements in the material.
###
* D.P. Bentz and W.J. Weiss. Internal Curing: A 2010 State-of-the-Art Review (NISTIR 7765). Feb. 2011. Available at: www.nist.gov/manuscript-publication-search.cfm?pub_id=907729.
Credit: NIST
Usage Restrictions: None
Don’t ask why ping.
I guess that Hadrian’s boys didn’t need to know why to know what worked.
Reardon Concrete?
My Italian ancestors were Calabrian...hard heads...good with masonry. ;-)
Reared on concrete? Well, I am a New Yorker. ;-)
So, you essentially take a ground, highly porous material, saturate it with water and use it as a portion of the fines?
LOL. One size fits all.
I don't know. There is a 5 meg PDF at the link for anyone sufficiently interested.
MN-DOT should hire Romans to build our bridges.
It’s conventional lightweight structural aggregate — (regional — here in So Cali it’s expanded shale, but other areas may use slate or clay). So it’s not really “highly porous”, but it does absorb some percentage of water (say 5-15%) over a 24 hour period.
One of the reasons concrete plants try to keep their aggregate stocks wet to the SSD (saturated, surface-dry) condition. The key, though, is knowing how much water content the aggregate has, because it has to be accounted for in the mix design.
· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe · |
|||
Antiquity Journal & archive Archaeologica Archaeology Archaeology Channel BAR Bronze Age Forum Discover Dogpile Eurekalert LiveScience Mirabilis.ca Nat Geographic PhysOrg Science Daily Science News Texas AM Yahoo Excerpt, or Link only? |
|
||
· Science topic · science keyword · Books/Literature topic · pages keyword · |
Either that or don't stack so much equipment on the bridge when your resurfacing it.
Visiting the Pantheon was a highlight of my touring Rome. Because it has been continuously maintained it looks like it could have been built 100 years ago instead of 1900. It’s like stepping into a time machine and visiting ancient Rome. Totally awesome.
NC State Concrete canoe in competition
Thanks colorado tanker. It’s strange to think how Rome would look today had it not burned in the reign of Nero.
This Pantheon was built to replace the somewhat earlier one that burned (it was brick and wood), but the original inscription was restored on a building Agrippa never lived to see.
There is a brand new (a few year’s old) tall building here in Seattle made of concrete. Except it seems that some union worker skimped on some of the details, and did not coat the tips of most of the rebar in epoxy.
The rust problem started showing up right away. Repairs cost something like $1.5 million. But they still didn’t work. The tenents have all been moved out and demolition of the entire building (14 stories???) is forthcoming.
(For want of a nail, the shoe was lost.....)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.