Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/20/2010 10:39:53 AM PDT by mgstarr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: mgstarr

“This is a step towards ... creation of living beings with capacities and natures that could never have naturally evolved.”

We will regret this one day


2 posted on 05/20/2010 10:41:25 AM PDT by mainsail that (Vote Obama: Get 15 salaries and retire at 45!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr

What happens if these “bacteria” escape. I doubt that we have any natural resistance to them.


3 posted on 05/20/2010 10:41:58 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (The 0bama regime represents an "Clear and Present Danger" to the US - Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr
Did they create it, or did they fabricate it?
4 posted on 05/20/2010 10:41:59 AM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr

Sorry, but this is not creation. Taking parts and reassembling them isn’t exactly anything new.


6 posted on 05/20/2010 10:44:13 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (We bury Democrats face down so that when they scratch, they get closer to home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr

Bookmark


8 posted on 05/20/2010 10:44:23 AM PDT by DocRock (All they that TAKE the sword shall perish with the sword. Matthew 26:52 Gun grabbers beware.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr

Does it have a Hawaiian birth certificate?


9 posted on 05/20/2010 10:45:29 AM PDT by jessduntno (Kagan...Filly-bust-her. Bork her. Bork her hard. She needs it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr

Total bunk.... at some point they had to introduce the real thing.

Are they claiming to have created a DNA strand? or just that they animated some inert DNA?


10 posted on 05/20/2010 10:46:08 AM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr

They are liars! They did not create a living organism from 4 bottles of chemicals. They added DNA to it. That’s cheating. Who invented the DNA?


11 posted on 05/20/2010 10:46:48 AM PDT by DallasDeb (USAFA '06 Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr
They did not create a living organism. They inserted artificially created genetic material into a living cell - big, HUGE difference.

When scientist take some chemicals, swish it around in a beaker and pour it into a petri dish, where it then begins to grow, call me. Until then, no one has yet to create life.

12 posted on 05/20/2010 10:47:04 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr
Prevent Grey Goo!! Pictures, Images and Photos
13 posted on 05/20/2010 10:47:45 AM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr

File this under “What can possibly go wrong?”.


14 posted on 05/20/2010 10:48:02 AM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr
The researchers built up the synthetic genome of M mycoides, with its million chemical letters, by stitching together shorter stretches of DNA, each about 1,000 letters long. They then transferred the completed genome into the shell of another bacterium M capricolum whose own DNA had been removed.

They used 4 different strands of pre-existing DNA to do this. They did not create the "life" from scratch. What a huge misrepresentation.
16 posted on 05/20/2010 10:49:44 AM PDT by wbarmy (I decided to be a sheepdog when I saw what happens to sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr
Here is another article on this.

If this is indeed true, then the long-range implications could shake our basic worldview. It is easy to see life as magic of a sort. This finding, if correct, means that Steven Weinberg's quip about life being "just a disease of matter" is correct. And that makes life, all life, us included, just "meat machines".

17 posted on 05/20/2010 10:50:30 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr

One day a group of scientists got together and decided that man had come a long way and no longer needed God. So they picked one scientist to go and tell Him that they were done with Him.

The scientist walked up to God and said, “God, we’ve decided that we no longer need you. We’re to the point that we can clone people and do many miraculous things, so why don’t you just go on and get lost.”

God listened very patiently and kindly to the man and after the scientist was done talking, God said, “Very well, how about this, let’s say we have a man making contest.” To which the scientist replied, “OK, great!”

But God added, “Now, we’re going to do this just like I did back in the old days with Adam.”

The scientist said, “Sure, no problem” and bent down and grabbed himself a handful of dirt.

God just looked at him and said, “No, no, no. You go get your own dirt!”


21 posted on 05/20/2010 10:53:13 AM PDT by Eepsy (www.pioacademy.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr
"Scientists have turned inanimate chemicals into a living organism."

Yeah, right, and I just turned my oatmeal into a hamburger.

But seriously, I just ain't buyin' it. Any number of things could corrupt or mess up their experiment.

23 posted on 05/20/2010 10:54:43 AM PDT by Lobsterback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr

I’ve been reading news releases about scientists creating life since the 60s, and it ain’t been so yet.

And even if they do do it, it was still created, not spontaneous.

I don’t know what that means in the larger scheme of things, but it wouldn’t hurt to keep it in mind.


25 posted on 05/20/2010 10:59:34 AM PDT by chesley (Lib arguments are neither factual, logical, rational, nor reasonable. They are, however, creative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr

“Created”?? Yeah, right.

When a scientist does that sort of “creating” with another scientist’s writings, it’s called “plagiarism”.


28 posted on 05/20/2010 11:03:39 AM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr
The researchers built up the synthetic genome of M mycoides, with its million chemical letters, by stitching together shorter stretches of DNA, each about 1,000 letters long. They then transferred the completed genome into the shell of another bacterium M capricolum whose own DNA had been removed.

Wow. So the gist of this article is just a plain old lie.

32 posted on 05/20/2010 11:37:40 AM PDT by Sloth (Civil disobedience? I'm afraid only the uncivil kind is going to cut it this time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr

Intelligent design. But remember: it’s not science.


35 posted on 05/20/2010 11:51:44 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mgstarr
“This is a step towards ... creation of living beings with capacities and natures that could never have naturally evolved.”

In short, intelligent design.

Don't tell Richard Dawkins.

42 posted on 05/20/2010 12:02:15 PM PDT by behzinlea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson