Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists at UCSB discover 600 million-year-old origins of vision
University of California - Santa Barbara ^ | Mar 11, 2010 | Unknown

Posted on 03/11/2010 12:11:56 PM PST by decimon

(Santa Barbara, Calif.) –– By studying the hydra, a member of an ancient group of sea creatures that is still flourishing, scientists at UC Santa Barbara have made a discovery in understanding the origins of human vision. The finding is published in this week's issue of the Proceedings of the Royal Society B, a British journal of biology.

Hydra are simple animals that, along with jellyfish, belong to the phylum cnidaria. Cnidarians first emerged 600 million years ago.

"We determined which genetic 'gateway,' or ion channel, in the hydra is involved in light sensitivity," said senior author Todd H. Oakley, assistant professor in UCSB's Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology. "This is the same gateway that is used in human vision."

Oakley explained that there are many genes involved in vision, and that there is an ion channel gene responsible for starting the neural impulse of vision. This gene controls the entrance and exit of ions; i.e., it acts as a gateway.

The gene, called opsin, is present in vision among vertebrate animals, and is responsible for a different way of seeing than that of animals like flies. The vision of insects emerged later than the visual machinery found in hydra and vertebrate animals.

"This work picks up on earlier studies of the hydra in my lab, and continues to challenge the misunderstanding that evolution represents a ladder-like march of progress, with humans at the pinnacle," said Oakley. "Instead, it illustrates how all organisms –– humans included –– are a complex mix of ancient and new characteristics."

###

David Plachetzki, who received his Ph.D. for work done in the Oakley lab, is the first author. Plachetzki is now a postdoctoral fellow at UC Davis. UCSB undergraduate Caitlin R. Fong is the second author of the paper.


TOPICS: History; Science
KEYWORDS: creation; evolution; godsgravesglyphs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 03/11/2010 12:11:56 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Cnearsighted.


2 posted on 03/11/2010 12:12:32 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

I don’t believe them.


3 posted on 03/11/2010 12:15:11 PM PST by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion
I don’t believe them.

Then don't.

4 posted on 03/11/2010 12:16:30 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: decimon

>>”Instead, it illustrates how all organisms –– humans included –– are a complex mix of ancient and new characteristics.” <<

Is that statement very scientific. It appears to be a statement of fact about something that, at best, is an hypothesis.


5 posted on 03/11/2010 12:17:36 PM PST by RobRoy (The US today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
"This work picks up on earlier studies of the hydra in my lab, and continues to challenge the misunderstanding that evolution represents a ladder-like march of progress, with humans at the pinnacle," said Oakley. "Instead, it illustrates how all organisms –– humans included –– are a complex mix of ancient and new characteristics."

Well I'll be a hydra's uncle! Keep telling humans that they're no different from the animals, and in a few generations they'll start to act like it.

6 posted on 03/11/2010 12:19:31 PM PST by sinatorhellary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Can a biologist explain this to me? The Hydra is a genus. Above that you have Family and Order and Class. Then you get to Phylum.

There seems to be an implication here that humans have this gene because cnidaria developed it 600 million years ago. Well, humans are in a different Phylum, so I don’t see how we got anything from the cnidaria. Meanwhile, flies are yet another phylum, and the article indicates that vision among such animals emerged later and separately. Why wouldn’t they say that about humans?

I fail to see why any connection is made between humans and hydra. If the gene is the same it would seem to argue more for an Intelligent Designer who re-used an idea that works rather than for a line of descent from two separate phyla.


7 posted on 03/11/2010 12:22:53 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (We're all heading toward red revolution - we just disagree on which type of Red we want.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Didn’t most - if not all - life on earth get trashed a mere 65 million years ago from an asteroid hit? Kinda like hitting the Reset button on all of this?


8 posted on 03/11/2010 12:26:37 PM PST by alancarp (Calling all states: Reduce the cost of doing business and jobs will flock to your doors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I agree. Somehow the Hydra would have to be representative of a common ancestor for this article to make sense.


9 posted on 03/11/2010 12:28:27 PM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: decimon

I know the origins of human sight.

It is sad that so many people are blinded to the truth.


10 posted on 03/11/2010 12:29:25 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Just to expand, if two phyla share a similar characteristic, then I would think that the characteristic would be expected to start before the phyla split. Which moves us up into the Kingdom level (Animalia). But if this gene for vision originates at the top of the animal kingdom, then why don't flies have it?

I'm just an uneducated rube, but I don't see how this hangs together as any sort of orderly descent.

11 posted on 03/11/2010 12:29:33 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (We're all heading toward red revolution - we just disagree on which type of Red we want.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Nature liked this gene so much that she transplanted it to other species.


12 posted on 03/11/2010 12:30:54 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

More handwaving and just so stories, couched in ‘scientific’ jargon.....


13 posted on 03/11/2010 12:31:34 PM PST by raygunfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Blind nature, of course, cannot do that. An Intelligent Designer can certainly do that. But what is being described here violates any sort of straight line of descent and therefore is an argument against Evolution.


14 posted on 03/11/2010 12:33:22 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (We're all heading toward red revolution - we just disagree on which type of Red we want.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion
By studying the hydra


15 posted on 03/11/2010 1:02:34 PM PST by a fool in paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: decimon
By studying the hydra, a member of an ancient group of sea creatures that is still flourishing...

Wow... I didn't know that these creatures are still around...

16 posted on 03/11/2010 1:03:53 PM PST by paudio (Are you better off today than in 2006, when the Democrats took over the Congress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

It’s a scam. I once got an e-mail from those Cnidarians promising me riches in exchange for a small processing fee.


17 posted on 03/11/2010 1:06:25 PM PST by Gritty-Kitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

bookmark


18 posted on 03/11/2010 1:21:55 PM PST by GOP Poet (Obama is an OLYMPIC failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gritty-Kitty
I once got an e-mail from those Cnidarians promising me riches in exchange for a small processing fee.

But you saw right through that.

19 posted on 03/11/2010 1:28:31 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: decimon
Yippeee Skippeeee!!! More papers to publish, more grants, pushing the edges of the pay envelope back just a bit further in the name of hydra genetics. Let's call it HydraGen!!!
20 posted on 03/11/2010 1:49:02 PM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson