Cnearsighted.
I don’t believe them.
>>”Instead, it illustrates how all organisms humans included are a complex mix of ancient and new characteristics.” <<
Is that statement very scientific. It appears to be a statement of fact about something that, at best, is an hypothesis.
Well I'll be a hydra's uncle! Keep telling humans that they're no different from the animals, and in a few generations they'll start to act like it.
Can a biologist explain this to me? The Hydra is a genus. Above that you have Family and Order and Class. Then you get to Phylum.
There seems to be an implication here that humans have this gene because cnidaria developed it 600 million years ago. Well, humans are in a different Phylum, so I dont see how we got anything from the cnidaria. Meanwhile, flies are yet another phylum, and the article indicates that vision among such animals emerged later and separately. Why wouldn’t they say that about humans?
I fail to see why any connection is made between humans and hydra. If the gene is the same it would seem to argue more for an Intelligent Designer who re-used an idea that works rather than for a line of descent from two separate phyla.
I know the origins of human sight.
It is sad that so many people are blinded to the truth.
Wow... I didn't know that these creatures are still around...
It’s a scam. I once got an e-mail from those Cnidarians promising me riches in exchange for a small processing fee.
bookmark
|
|||
Gods |
The eyes have it. Thanks decimon. Eyebrow to your audacity. :') |
||
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google · · The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
This is preposterous. There is so much complexity in the human eye, that to believe that it arose through a series of mistakes in the DNA is absurd.