Posted on 11/10/2009 10:20:03 AM PST by llevrok
FORT WALTON BEACH A 59-year-old Fort Walton Beach man was arrested for indecent exposure after a neighbor saw him Tuesday wearing only a G-string.
A woman reported seeing her Tanager Road neighbor sunbathing, wearing only a pink G-string. She told deputies the man stood up two times and she clearly saw his exposed buttocks, according to an Okaloosa County Sheriffs report.
The mans yard also is not enclosed by any fence and is visible from the road, to neighbors and a school bus stop, the report said.
The deputy pulled up to the mans house. When the man saw the deputy, he got up from his lawn chair and went inside. In doing so, the deputy saw the mans buttocks, the report said.
When the deputy spoke with him he smelled alcohol on his breath and, according to the report, only part of his genitalia was covered by the G-string.
So, you perceive the term “bubble butt” to mean a distended anus?
but can she cook?
aaarrrgh!!! hahaha!
donno jonno. Does it matter?
(Especially if your mawashi happens to be pink...)
The young Lady who mows my lawn.
"Officer, I can't get any work done!!!"
Bubble butt refers to Glutial muscles - which is hardly something indecent. The part that bothers me, is that we have one woman (and some relatively ignorant deputies) who have determined what is indecent exposure. If convicted, this man faces being listed as a sex criminal - this is hardly the same as exposing one's sexual organs in public.
Besides, you are confusing a colloquialism with a medical term - and the law uses medical terms in describing exactly what is indecent in that particular locale.
If the country wants to limit straps on a G-string to be a minimum width; that's fine. Leaving such terms up to the interpretation of the police or a citizen means we have nonuniform interpretations and enforcement.
No, ‘butt’ usually refers to the glute’s and all.
When did you move?
So every bikini on the market should result in an indecent exposure arrest? Every leotard, tankini and Speedo should result in a conviction?
No. The article never said ‘butt’; it said ‘buttocks’.
A poster here on FR said ‘butt’ to kind of make the point “Well duh! Of course the butt (buttocks) are exposed it’s a “G-String!””.
You’re reasoning was poor despite your conclusion being plausible.
There are a lot of people who have too much time on their hands and need to learn what you should call the police for. Not stuff like this.
Hmmm, pretty in pink?
A pink g-string on a guy showing off his nuts.
Hmmmm
maybe i’ll buy lawns. lots of lawns.
Here's the part you are missing; without the clarification of covering the anus; a jock strap would be acceptable beach wear. Obviously, this is not appropriate beach wear, yet a G-string is permitted. There is a reason why I chose the words I chose; you just weren't astute enough to understand the other ramifications.
Sodom and Gemorah here we come!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.