Posted on 11/09/2009 5:32:54 PM PST by rxsid
Recently filed court docs in the BARNETT v. Obama case in the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BARNETT v OBAMA Motion for Reconsideration
BARNETT v OBAMA Taitz Declaration
BARNETT v OBAMA Coroner Report & Sinclair Affidavit
LOL! That's even more fitting!
Yes, what you say is very true. At least she has been a royal pain in his butt. I’m still amazed however, that this is NOT an issue that the Courts would find of utmost importance. I mean, after all, what is the Oath they swear to: To Uphold the Constitution of the United States. Seems to me THAT is their mandate and yet they refuse to do so. CO
How is it the Judge’s fault that one guy that didn’t want to deploy wasn’t retained by Orly?
I'm sorry, but that is despicable. It's not just illogical, unreasoned, and pointless; it's lacking any sense of simple human decency.
Judge Carter was the brave stalwart marine primed to save the day. Then he made a competent legal ruling consistent with obvious precedent, as he's supposed to, and he's the scum of the earth. That alone tells one all they need to know about the quality of thought behind this stuff.
if anyone could explain just where exactly Sinclair and Taitz differ, I would appreciate.
It was quite predictable how quickly Judge Carter became persona non grata among people who sincerely believed he would bypass the rule of law, the Constitution, and single-handedly remove Obama from office.
Jim, is this what Freerepublic has now sunken to, being a place for ridicule and derision by the obamanoids like non-sequitur, etcetera? If the birth certification issue is such an offense to you and Freerepublic, why not just have your admins ban all threads related to same? Was the Rudy obscenity spectacle so vital to deal with yet this open ridicule not on your radar? ... Is this protected ridicule related to which admin is on duty?
That is one serious run-on sentence.
Man. Seriously, this isn't a motion; it's a cry for help. To anyone with any real experience in the law, courts, or simply framing an argument, this is obviously deranged.
I plead guilty to the second half.
Methinks your real home should be at the Daily Kooks, DUh or HuffPo sites. I would imagine those commie clowns whoop it up daily in their after-birther threads -- and you'd fit right in.
If I did that then who would be around to rap you on your tinfoil beanie and point out how ridiculous you sound?
Do you have a link to something that supports your opinion? Would appreciate it.
Let's see: Drew68. WOSG, mlo, etc. etc. etc.
Next fact: We Birthers remain the only voice of reason in this country, and we aren't going away until your hero Barry is exposed for the fraud that he is.
Killing 14 people and excusing like your dear leader does and his stooges like Carter is despicable.
Go bury your head in the sand McCain. You obviously have no clue as to what is going on in this country. Carter is a dhimini. Are you one too? Go pay your jizya tax with Carter like a good little dhimini.
Now you’re being silly.
It would seem your statement above shows you to have more than a little in common with the "birther" movement.
You say: "a big part of me sincerely hopes that Obama never shows his birth certificate"
I thought anti-birthers believed that the (putative) COLB he displayed on-line WAS -- according to anti-birthers -- a TRUE copy of his birth certificate?
Then you state: If he ever did,{show the birth certificate} then Birthers would go away..."
Yes, we ALL agree with you!
If Obama presented an original copy of his "long form" birth certificate to a proper court of law... a birth certificate that can THEN be examined by same... "Birthers would go away," as you so stated.
Again, it has been my experience that anti-birthers are of the opinion that "birthers" would NEVER go away -- no matter if Obama pony's up his Birth certificate?
So what IS your beef with those that are skeptical -- like yourself -- of the (putative)COLB Obama has displayed on-line?
It's hard for me to believe that you -- or ANY American --would find indulging in a game of bait and switch with our constitution, by a sitting President of The United States, amusing?
Don't you agree that he should show his Birth certificate -- as outlined above?
Thank you ahead of time for your reply.
STE=Q
Well, I guess I answered my own question.
Besides Larry not wanting to be associated with birthers generally and Orly specifically, I still do not understand what motivated him to send his letter to judge.
http://blessedistruth.wordpress.com/2009/11/08/musica-por-una-tarde-de-domingo/#comment-112
The anti-birthers aka DU Dummies always attack birthers but never acknowledge Obama has never provided his BC.
They are little dhiminis for the Democrat Islamist Party and the Saudi King.
“Killing 14 people and excusing like your dear leader does and his stooges like Carter is despicable.”
Killing 14 people is despicable. The rest of your sentence is incoherent. It speaks only to your own unfocused rage.
Spewing names and accusations that are self-evidently absurd doesn’t impress anyone. I hope it at least makes you feel better.
I typed it quickly. You know what makes me feel better is reading your lame and laughable response.
Tired and Old is accurate - the conservative part is not accurate. You are more like McCain - tired, old and a RINO. You may also be an older version of Newt the DIABLO.
It is likely that he presented a fraudulent Kenyan document to the court and signed an affidavit of authenticity. His subsequent actions may be nothing more than the scammer trying to wiggle his way back from presenting fraudulent evidence ot a federal court. Smith is not a credible person so what he does —presenting a document or accusing Taitz of suborning perjury— should not be taken as sane or ‘scam-free’. Orly presented what she was given. Msith may be trying to distance himaself from his own scam.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.