To: F15Eagle
True, but why on earth would a ‘reputable’ cable network like The History Channel devote an hour to this man??
7 posted on
09/30/2009 3:59:59 PM PDT by
SilvieWaldorfMD
(Airlines can take their $15-per-checked-bag surcharge and shove it!)
To: SilvieWaldorfMD
‘The History Channel’ is owned in part by NBC, GE and Microsoft. I can’t watch it without throwing a shoe at the TV, LOL!
I’m no History Major, but some of the ‘history’ they sell is just flat-out lies.
They love this ‘who-do-voo-doo’ stuff, and if they had their way, they’d prove that we didn’t win WWII.
Take that for what it’s worth...I’m going to make my own destiny. You should too. Prepare for the worst and pray for the best. :)
18 posted on
09/30/2009 4:10:46 PM PDT by
Diana in Wisconsin
(Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
To: SilvieWaldorfMD
22 posted on
09/30/2009 4:16:27 PM PDT by
Chickensoup
(Angry about where our country is going with the current regime at the helm.)
To: SilvieWaldorfMD
why on earth would a ‘reputable’ cable network like The History Channel devote an hour to this man??
To get folks like you to watch it.........its all about viewership.
Personally, I like Fringe.....
32 posted on
09/30/2009 4:18:16 PM PDT by
Hot Tabasco
(Who's your Long Legged MacDaddy?)
To: SilvieWaldorfMD
A good question. My guess is that they have to dumb down to get viewers. This is an alarming trend. The National Geographic Channel has similar fare; e.g., shows devoted to the goings on at various tattoo parlors around the country. The decline of our culture continues apace.
36 posted on
09/30/2009 4:22:19 PM PDT by
donaldo
To: SilvieWaldorfMD
True, but why on earth would a ‘reputable’ cable network like The History Channel devote an hour to this man?? The History Channel has been adjusting facts for well over a year, along with "NatGeo" to fit the NWO consensus. I used to watch them extensively, now rarely.
43 posted on
09/30/2009 4:29:01 PM PDT by
4woodenboats
(Facts are like fried eggs - just give 'em to me hot off the griddle, I'll add my own seasoning.)
To: SilvieWaldorfMD
The History Channel has long since given over to a melange of fairly accurate history and outright fictional nonsense. This crap is fiction. It draws viewers. What can I say?
46 posted on
09/30/2009 4:32:10 PM PDT by
hinckley buzzard
(truth--the liberal's kryptonite.)
To: SilvieWaldorfMD
They are obsessed with him and with Hitler as well. Would they be so obsessed with Jesus...sigh.
74 posted on
09/30/2009 5:49:02 PM PDT by
Marysecretary
(GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL!)
To: SilvieWaldorfMD
True, but why on earth would a ‘reputable’ cable network like The History Channel devote an hour to this man?? Same reason that discovery covers UFOs and other paranormal events.
I don't find these channels to be "reputable" or fact based.
And there seems to be a lot of hyperbole in biographical presentations (even on PBS). IF IT WASN'T FOR THIS ONE PERSON, yadda yadda yadda.
I've seen reports on Galileo that totally ignored Copernicus but included numerous attacks on organized religion.
85 posted on
10/01/2009 8:25:21 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(There is no truth in the Pravda Media.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson