Posted on 08/09/2009 4:45:11 PM PDT by Polarik
Basically, it comes down to this. I made a promise to my family get off of here, but continued to break that promise. There is sufficient momentum for the birth certificate issue to where any further research is unnecessary.
The fact that Hawaii refuses to authenticate or acknowledge producing the COLB that the libs insist that is real, along with the statements made to me by Dr. Alvin Onaka in late October, pretty much nixes any hope by the opposition that a real Obama 2007 COLB exists.
The libs can refute my research all they want, but it's not going change the reality that they are arguing about a nonexistent document.
It is they who are on the wrong side of reality, not me.
My last post says it all:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2311347/posts
If anyone believes that the one and only scan image was produced by what appears in the Factcheck photos, then there is seriously something wrong with their eyesight.
There is nothing wrong with the eyesight of scores of FReepers who saw shadows under the letters on the Factcheck photograph of a "real COLB."
http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn227/Polarik/small-COLBS/two-certfs.jpg
The image above is the photo I took of a real COLB using the same make and model of camera as Factcheck, except that I had a real COLB. The one on the bottom is the image with the shadows. Those pink arrows are pointing to them.
I would sincerely love to hear how the opposition explains those, but I gotta go.
I also leave with the challenge I made but never taken:
Make a real scan, naturally and honestly, that looks like the alleged "scan image."
No one can. It's impossible for several reasons. The colors of this image are so far off from the actual colors contained in a real COLB scan, that you cannot get there without extensive manipulation of the color curves.
Secondly, the background image and the text were deliberately subjected to heavy sharpening using an Unsharp Mask - but they were not done at the same time.
Lastly, that "funky" border, as one of my favorite critics described it, will not be exactly reproducible from any scanned COLB border in existence.
"Close" only counts in horseshoes.
No way. No how.
Oh, you may get close after playing around with all of the controls in Photoshop, but you will not get the border pattern right.
I know because I reproduced it (middle image), and I know how it was done - it was made separately and added to the image.
http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn227/Polarik/FactCheck%20Originals/BORDER-COMPARISON.jpg
But, if you think you can do it, more power to you.
Rather than ragging on my research, which is what I do better than anyone, go ahead and do your own.
It's easy.
Oh, I forgot. You have to get a real COLB to do it.
Isn't it funny that none, nada, zip, zero of my critics has ever made a real COLB scan from a real COLB in over a year since I began my research, and actualy replicated what I did.
They'll make up some excuse for not reading all of my research report, like it was "too painful to read," and so forth. Then, they will do their own thing which is not remotely close to my thing.
Well, don't be discouraged: Factcheck never had a real COLB, either.
I would like to thank everyone who supported me and those who know me will be passing along the latest news on FR to me.
BUT, I am never logging back on FR as Polarik again.
That's a promise I will keep.
Many thanks, Polarik. God bless you. Research posted here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2136816/posts
Thank you Polarik for your research and hard work. Well done.
I always find it uncomfortable when people find it necessary to inform a website that they wont be posting on a message board anymore.
Well played!
Is that a bye-ku?
The rumblings of sisters, moose and cheese are rampant. Spork Weasels unite!
TANKS a bunch for all your work my FRiend,,,
GOD Bless You...
Ouch! I shall swear no more!
Welcome to FR...
Bye Polarik ((((((Hugs))))))
I've been in graphic arts my entire professional life, have been in sales, service, training and installation for Scitex (based in Herzlia, Israel,bought out by Kodak), was involved with the very first RIPs (raster image processors) in the industry, and know graphic file formats like the back of my hand, for both lithographic and electronic print, and electronic media. Somebody ELSE doesn't, though, only possessing the knowledge of a very low-level website employee.
What has all this so-called “analysis” gained anyone but Obama? It's gained him a lot of time, a lot of smokescreen and a lot of discrediting of the one online presence with the resources to get to the bottom of his ineligibility, prior to his taking office.
Everybody wanted to relive the glory days of Rathergate, our opposition knew it, and they took very thorough advantage of it, and are still taking advantage of it.
That JPEG of a photo of a scan of whatever the heck it was ... why on earth does anybody or did anybody think that goofy, faux “investigative” methods on the flippin’ JPEG of all things, proved anything? It didn't, and it doesn't.
If you still don't or won't understand, look at the gigantic kerfluffle FReepers Swordmaker and Salamander are STILL trying to tamp down, due to having converted an image from PNG to JPEG and sharpening the image, on the purported “Kenyan birth certificate.”
“Ron Polarik” was a laughingstock before he ever popped his head up on FR, and remained a laughingstock everywhere BUT here.
Good riddance.
And you enabled the whole charade, knowing full well that this person was highly, highly questionable. You knew because I told you so.
Thanks for all your efforts to find the truth and unmask the lies, and may your path be smooth.
Kind regards,
lj
 |
One issue wonders come and go. Still the forum is here. Have a drink. |
Spare me the haiku. It’s been painful to hold my tongue while some con artist (or a group of them) won over FReepers I admire and respect. This “one issue wonder” was particularly damaging, deliberately so in my opinion.
If you’re so inclined, have a drink yourself. Me, I’ve got work to do.
Thanks Polarik - in time we’ll all meet again...
Told you. Back in 08, I told you. Got called a troll and an “Obot” and put in a ludicrous “little black book” for trying to point out that this guy was shady, known to be shady, a laughingstock elsewhere ... but no.
***All you had to do was generate an analysis that showed Polarik didn’t know what he was talking about, point by point. Did you?
If you still don’t or won’t understand, look at the gigantic kerfluffle FReepers Swordmaker and Salamander are STILL trying to tamp down, due to having converted an image from PNG to JPEG and sharpening the image, on the purported “Kenyan birth certificate.”
***Thanks for pointing that out. It’s a good data point.
“Ron Polarik” was a laughingstock before he ever popped his head up on FR, and remained a laughingstock everywhere BUT here.
***Then it should have been easy for you to tear apart his analysis, point by point. But you didn’t, as far as I can tell.
Good riddance. And you enabled the whole charade, knowing full well that this person was highly, highly questionable. You knew because I told you so.
***You still prefer it to be your word against his rather than your analysis against his. You have NO analysis and he at least had something. Since you had the KNOWLEDGE to unlock this mystery and DIDN’T do it, the responsibility is on YOU, not us. We do what we can with what we have, and you did not equip other freepers in this battle, assuming what you say is true.
By the by, Polarik’s expose on the difference in notary stamps is still irreftueably right on, and he took the time to get actual CoLBs from different years to show the clear differences, proving the exhibited CoLB at Factcheck and KOS and Obama’s Fightthesmears was a gross forgery, a fraud.
LOL I have not heard that in years! LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.