Posted on 05/25/2009 3:39:41 PM PDT by JoeProBono
A woman and her 13-year-old son who were on the run from court-ordered cancer treatment for the boy have returned to Minnesota, the Brown County Sheriff's Office said Monday.
"Daniel Hauser and his mother have been returned to Minnesota," according to a news release. It did not reveal any additional details, but said there would be a news conference Monday evening.
The FBI's affidavit in support of an arrest warrant for Colleen alleges she fled the state Tuesday to avoid being prosecuted on two state counts of depriving another of custodial or parental rights in Brown County.
The FBI said the pair flew from Minnesota to Los Angeles last Tuesday on Sun Country Airlines. Investigators suspected they might have headed to one of a number of alternative cancer clinics in northern Mexico.
The issue here is whether the state trumps parent rights and responsibiliites. Stop moving the question.
Nope. The issue is when the state trumps parental rights. Almost everyone agrees that the state must “rescue” the child (or other family member) under some circumstances, so the only issue is where to draw the line. This is not an either/or binary problem.
For instance, I assume you would be opposed to forced clitorectomy of young Muslim girls. If parental control is absolute, it’s nobody else’s business.
You still moved the question.
I am not sure that the state’s involvement has been a good thing for families.
It really doesnt matter to me what Muslims to their daughters. I know it sounds cold. But Jews cut off their son’s forskins, Muslims do too now that I think of it. Parents inflict their culture and their beliefs on their children
I do not, however, think that it is a state issue.
You’re at least consistent. But I think most Americans are unwilling to give that much power to parents over their children.
Female genital mutilation, BTW, is not, or anyway is not always, comparable to circumcision of males. Some versions are a lot more analogous to castration.
OK, let’s move it a little farther.
In ancient Carthage, parents offered their children as sacrifices when the city was in peril.
Do you have any objection to that, or should parental rights allow for human sacrifice?
If human sacrifice of children should be prohibited by the state, you’re not in favor o an absolute limitation on state power over families. You’re just wanting to draw the line where the state intervenes at a different location.
The BS is entirely yours.
Type II diabetes has been successfully eradicated through control of biofilm bacteria for many years.
You paid deceivers here need to at least get up to speed on reality.
Cut the comic relief.
This is a serious thread that leaves no room for a doofus like you. Grow up and get a life.
OK, let’s move it a little farther.
In ancient Carthage, parents offered their children as sacrifices when the city was in peril.
Do you have any objection to that, or should parental rights allow for human sacrifice?
Bit of a drama queen here...human sacrifice versus not treating a sick child in traditional manner.
I never said any child should be killed. Withholding or choosing different modes of therapy is not killing.
Merk
Female genital mutilation, BTW, is not, or anyway is not always, comparable to circumcision of males. Some versions are a lot more analogous to castration.
I understood this. It is certainly not something I would do for my child, however I dont think this is a State issue.
You don’t seem to understand the concept I’m trying to get across.
You’re opposed to all state intervention overriding parental rights, except when you aren’t.
There is a spectrum, running from the state prohibiting spanking or parents smoking around the kid, to the state prohibiting murder.
Unless you agree to allow murder, you believe in state intervention at some point on that spectrum. IOW, as I stated several posts ago, the question is not whether you disapprove of state intervention, it’s one of where you draw the line.
Unless you agree to allow murder, you believe in state intervention at some point on that spectrum. IOW, as I stated several posts ago, the question is not whether you disapprove of state intervention, it’s one of where you draw the line.
That is your castle in the sky. I do not believe in state intervention for medical care of minors. If you read upthread, you will find that I believe in hanging parents who kill their children.
That's really the crux isn't it? We're at a fundamental disagreement. You don't think it's a state, and I absolutely believe that the prevention of a crime this heinous is absolutely a state issue. We shall never agree.
That’s really the crux isn’t it? We’re at a fundamental disagreement. You don’t think it’s a state, and I absolutely believe that the prevention of a crime this heinous is absolutely a state issue. We shall never agree.
Probably right.
The Daniel Hauser family surrendered to law enforcement officials today. Watch NaturalNews for updates on this breaking news situation...
In the mean time, Daniel Hauser isn’t the only teen who had to flee the law in order to save his own life from aggressive chemotherapy docotrs: Another young man named Billy Best also had to flee authorities fifteen years ago! And guess what? Today he’s alive and thriving, living on superfoods, herbs and natural remedies! (So much for the myth that if they don’t take chemo, they’ll die, huh?)
Read that astounding story here:
http://www.naturalnews.com/026329.html
(Contains a link to a video featuring Billy Best...)
Thnx!
Claims that he cured his cancer with diet and natural medicine are completely spurious.
I’m not talking about “wounds.”
The proximate cause of insulin insensitivity at the cellular level is a severe endocrine malfunction brought on by the cessation of production of a number of hormones, due to the biofilm damage to various glands.
Diabetics are getting cured every day through attacking the biofilms with natural agents, such as alicin. Alicin is vastly more effective in killing bacteria than any antibiotic because it can be used continually in fairly high doses without destroying the digestive process as antibiotics do.
Take a hike you wacko loony-tune misquoting hypocrite.
People want real people with real world opinions to respond, not some sort of insane anti-science ignorant Luddite.
Not “garlic,” but the alicin from garlic.
Its a process that feeds the alicin to lactobacillis which results in a stable form of alicin, unlike from just fresh garlic, which oxidizes too quickly to store.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.