· Google ·
hilarious when the whole house of cards is built on non existant, non visible, ‘dark’ matter....
and they claim we creationist believe in fairy tales...
whatabunchMAROOOOOONS....
This whole dark matter thingy gives me a giggle when I imagine the Lord and Creator of all that is...having loads of fun toying with cosmologists by changing the rules of His game with nothing but a mere thought or twitch of His finger.
"Heh heh....watch this...I'm going to decrease the mass of this whole section of the universe...watch 'em start scrambling...this'll be good."
The entire so called physical universe is an illusion; a projection of the collective ego. Quit wasting all this energy trying to figure it out. Just relax and enjoy reading FR everyday while you are still living the dream.
Well...there have been recent galactic observations that were explained by “exotic dark matter” affecting visible matter. No doubt there are other potential explanations, but these were considered fairly definitive evidence of dark matter.
Dark matter (of exotic or non-exotic form) most likely exists, unless the quantities we consider “constant” in current physics are in fact non-constant. That’s an issue that’s not being addressed to any great extent at the moment, since it violates a central tenet of science, that physical law remains constant over time.
The 2002 Scientific American article on MOND, written by the father of the MOND theory, Dr. Mordehai Milgrom, can be read at
http://www.astro.umd.edu/~ssm/mond/sad0802Milg6p.pdf
MOND modifies Newton’s f=ma law to become f=ma^2 for small values of acceleration, with f=ma still applying for larger values of acceleration.
Jack
This may strike some of you as odd, but I have placed the subject of dark matter on my list of Things-Not-To-Worry-About.
Incidentally, I thought it was rather kind -(if a bit enterprising)- of some to explain the Lord’s position on all this !
· Google ·
LMAO!
Big time!
They’re trying to blame it on Newton, even though the papers have been full of items for the last thirty years braggin up Einstein, even thought we’ve been adamantly told for the last four decades or so to completely discard Newton’s theory...
So now that GR doesn’t cut the mustard, they want to blame Newton!
Hint number A:
Einsteins theory depends and requires a “classical vacuum”. Something we now know does not exist. Anytime. Anywhere.
CMAO!
(Chuckling my A off!!)
Einstein STOLE his ideas. It’s very well documented and proven.
I have long held that the correct description of Gravitational Force is NOT that it is dependent EXACTLY on the reciprocal of distance squared. A very small linear component seems possible to account for much of the difficulty that is seen in today’s cosmology. Another inference would be that the linear extent of the universe is greater than the “visible” universe. The anomalous force allowing galaxies to remain together is a result of the matter which is outside the visible universe- it is not “dark”, but is simply too distant to be seen.