LMAO!
Big time!
They’re trying to blame it on Newton, even though the papers have been full of items for the last thirty years braggin up Einstein, even thought we’ve been adamantly told for the last four decades or so to completely discard Newton’s theory...
So now that GR doesn’t cut the mustard, they want to blame Newton!
Hint number A:
Einsteins theory depends and requires a “classical vacuum”. Something we now know does not exist. Anytime. Anywhere.
CMAO!
(Chuckling my A off!!)
Einstein STOLE his ideas. It’s very well documented and proven.
>>So now that GR doesn’t’t cut the mustard, they want to blame Newton!
I think the discrepancy is due to an inadequate knowledge of space itself - i.e. variability of the “Classic Vacuum”.
If Space is to Energy as Energy is to Mass, then I suspect the observations attributed to “dark matter” can be explained by presuming a localized density of space - where spatial distortion is equivalent to E. “Dark matter” existing where E is locally sufficient to manifest the weak gravitational force (observable as gravitational lensing) but insufficient to manifest the strong forces required for the creation of matter.
If this is the case, then mass would be variable in proportion to the density of its spatial context.
G=M+E
IOW: Total Relative Gravity = Newtonian Gravity + Spatial Energy Density.