No second chance? Can Earth explode as a result of Global Warming?

Abstract: The heat generated inside our planet is predominantly of radionic (nuclear) origin. Hence, Earth in its entirety can be considered considered a slow nuclear reactor with its solid ”inner core” providing a major contribution to the total energy output. Since radionic heat is generated in the entire volume and cooling can only occur at the surface, the highest temperature inside Earth occurs at the center of the inner core. Overheating the center of the inner core reactor due to the so-called greenhouse effect on the surface of Earth may cause a meltdown condition, an enrichment of nuclear fuel and a gigantic atomic explosion.

Summary: Consequences of global warming are far more serious than previously imagined. The REAL danger for our entire civilization comes not from slow climate changes, but from overheating of the planetary interior.

Life on Earth is possible only because of the efficient cooling of the planetary interior - a process that is limited primarily by the atmosphere. This cooling is responsible for a thermal balance between the heat from the core reactor, the heat from the Sun and the radiation of heat into space, so that the average temperature on Earth’s surface is about 13 degrees Celsius.

This article examines the possibility of overheating and the ”meltdown” of the solid planetary core due to the atmospheric pollution trapping progressively more solar heat (the so-called greenhouse effect) and reducing the cooling rate of the planetary interior.

The most serious consequence of such a ”meltdown” could be centrifugal segregation of unstable isotopes in the molten part of the spinning planetary core. Such segregation can ”enrich” the nuclear fuel in the core to the point of creating conditions for a chain reaction and a gigantic atomic explosion. Will Earth become another ”asteroid belt” in the Solar system?

It is common knowledge (experiencing seasons) that solar heat is the dominant factor that determines temperatures on the surface of Earth. Under the polar ice however, the contribution of solar heat is minimal and this is where the increasing contribution of the heat from the planetary interior can be seen best. Rising polar ocean temperatures and melting polar ice caps should therefore be the first symptoms of overheating of the inner core reactor.

While politicians and businessmen debate the need for reducing greenhouse emissions and take pride to evade accepting any responsibility, the process of overheating the inner core reactor has already begun - polar oceans have become warmer and polar caps have begun to melt. Do we have enough imagination, intelligence and integrity to comprehend the danger before the situation becomes irreversible? There will be NO SECOND CHANCE...

From the link:

[Can a planet explode?
If a planet can indeed explode, and there was at least one such event somewhere in our Solar system in the distant
past, we should be able to find the evidence of it today. This is due to the fact that the debris from the exploded
planet would not vanish. Bits and pieces would not only remain, but their collective presence should still mark a
3.4
NU Journal of Discovery, Vol 3, May 2001, NUjournal.net (c) Natural Uni, Chalko:’Can Earth explode..?’ - page 5 of 9
trajectory (the orbit around the Sun) of the planet that exploded.
It is a well-known fact that there exists the so-called ”asteroid belt” in our Solar system. It is a ”belt” of a large
number of asteroids that orbit the Sun along orbits that are located between Mars and Jupiter. At least 40,000 of
these asteroids are thought to have diameters larger than 0.8 km (0.5 mile). The largest asteroid in the asteroid
belt, called Ceres, is about 930 kilometers across.
The existence and the origin of the entire asteroid belt are long standing scientific puzzles. Why does the
asteroid belt exist only between Mars and Jupiter and there are no asteroid belts between other planets?
The present belief is that planets in the solar system formed out of randomly distributed dust and other bits and
pieces. Hence, it is also believed that the growth of a full-sized planet between Mars and Jupiter was ”aborted”
during the early evolution of the solar system.
The explosion of a planet that existed between Mars and Jupiter is a much more logical and plausible explanation.
In Greek Mythology there is a story about a planet that exploded. The planet was called Phaëthon. In the myth
Phaëthon was ”destroyed by a thunderbolt”. Did our ancestors embed this event in their belief system because
they actually witnessed a planetary explosion and they just couldn’t explain it any other way? Can we determine
today what is a myth and what is an actual fact? Plato, one of the greatest writers and philosophers of all time,
was aware that the story of Phaëthon ”destroyed by a thunderbolt” had its origin in a real planetary event. He
wrote [9] : ”Now this has the form of a myth, but really signifies decline of the bodies moving in the heavens...”.
The meaning of the word ”phaëthon” () in ancient Greek is ”giving light, luminous, brilliant, shining”
[10]. Note that words ”phaëthon” and ”photon” originate from the same root (o
=
) [10]. In the myth,
Phaëthon is known as ”the son of Helios” (the son of the Sun) [9]. Doesn’t this hint that the planet Phaëthon was
one of the brightest objects in the sky at night? Isn’t it obvious that the disappearance of such an object would
attract attention of even a casual sky observer? The story of the destruction of Phaëthon ”by a thunderbolt”[9]
indicates that our ancestors perceived its explosion to be as bright as lightning. Should we ignore a witness
report of our ancestors embedded not only in their heritage but also in their language?]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.