Skip to comments.
Dinosaur Swallows Human
http://www.biblelandstudios.com/nuke/ ^
 | 12-24-04
 | "Bibleland"
Posted on 12/24/2004 7:37:06 AM PST by BenLurkin
Dear Friends, 
Thank you for your patience and without further delay Bibleland Studios presents The Photos as promised of what appears to be a fossil of a Dinosaur Swallowing a Human. Do these photos provide the necessary evidence that dinosaurs and humans coexisted in our recent ancient past? From our latest poll many of you believe humans and dinosaurs did coexist. But just because we believe it does that make it so? Bibleland Studios is interested in objective; naked, pure unadulterated truth no matter where it leads. Do you believe as I do that the desire to know where we came from beats in the breast of everyman, woman and child? Did we come from an ape-like creature or a beautiful pair created in innocent splendor? Lets find out. 
How I acquired these photos 
One evening in early December I picked up the latest copy of a certain Australian Creation Science newsletter and began thumbing through the pages. Suddenly without warning there they were! The Photos. Could what Im looking at be true?! I phoned the publisher in Australia and asked him straight out, Is this true? Are these photos real? He assured me they were. Contacting the author, I got permission to publish them on our site for the entire world to see. So here they are for your consideration
TOPICS: Religion; Science; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: 60000posts; archaeology; ggg; godsgravesglyphs; history
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next  last
To: Texas Eagle
    Or maybe they smoked cigarettes.
 
 No...You usually have one AFTER you finish eating.
21
posted on 
12/24/2004 7:58:40 AM PST
by 
superskunk
(Quinn's Law:  Liberalism always produces the exact opposite of it's stated intent.)
 
To: BenLurkin
    This looks too perfect to be real but who am I...
  
  
 May I recommend this thought provoking book (you can get it at Amazon):
  
 Forbidden Archeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race
 by Michael A. Cremo, Richard L. Thompson
To: eastforker
    Look at it agaian. Both the dinosaur and the humanoid are lying horizontal on the ground. How could he be chasing the humanoid? Get a grip, it's a fraud.
  
  
 Like the gubernatorial election in Washington, it probably is fraud. I was just giving them the benefit of the doubt.
23
posted on 
12/24/2004 8:01:41 AM PST
by 
superskunk
(Quinn's Law:  Liberalism always produces the exact opposite of it's stated intent.)
 
To: BenLurkin
    Not debating origin or giants, just the validity of the photo, you just don't want to know my theory, it could cause massive trauma for those not ready.
 
24
posted on 
12/24/2004 8:01:46 AM PST
by 
eastforker
(Ask me about a free satellite TV system!)
 
To: A knight without armor; blam; SunkenCiv
25
posted on 
12/24/2004 8:01:58 AM PST
by 
BenLurkin
(Big government is still a big problem.)
 
To: BenLurkin
    Maybe the human had drunk unfiltered water and when the dinosaurs tooth pierced his bladder, they both died of arsenic poisoning.
 
26
posted on 
12/24/2004 8:02:19 AM PST
by 
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all)
 
To: eastforker
    Today I am game for just about anything.
 
27
posted on 
12/24/2004 8:02:52 AM PST
by 
BenLurkin
(Big government is still a big problem.)
 
To: BenLurkin
    Doesn't pass the smell test, somehow.
 
28
posted on 
12/24/2004 8:03:00 AM PST
by 
7.62 x 51mm
(• veni • vidi • vino • visa • "I came, I saw, I drank wine, I shopped")
 
To: BenLurkin
    Humans (still) Swallow Dinosaur Fable
29
posted on 
12/24/2004 8:04:03 AM PST
by 
mikrofon
(Prehistoric thinking)
 
To: BenLurkin
    Maybe the Australian Creation Science was running low on funds. 
It kind of reminds me of when NASA was being threatened with budget cuts a few years ago. Lo, and behold, there was suddenly strong evidence that life may have existed on Mars. 
Maybe these two creatures were the first space travellers.
 
30
posted on 
12/24/2004 8:04:52 AM PST
by 
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all)
 
To: BenLurkin
    Thanks, I don't know how to do pictures.
 
To: BenLurkin
    time to call in fart bell in pahrump, nv.
 
32
posted on 
12/24/2004 8:08:11 AM PST
by 
ken21
(kerrycide = running 4 president  on treasonous service in vietnam)
 
To: A knight without armor
    Well then, show us your breasts.
 
33
posted on 
12/24/2004 8:09:22 AM PST
by 
JusPasenThru
(If you want to get it movin' you must learn to doof da bouven.)
 
To: BenLurkin
    Well, humans arrived and evolved way too quickley to be considered for the evolution theory. It was either devine creation or genetic engineering. Either is possible but in the realm of things it is the same product. We are either the product of God or an alien experiment, I report, you decide.
 
34
posted on 
12/24/2004 8:11:18 AM PST
by 
eastforker
(Ask me about a free satellite TV system!)
 
To: A knight without armor
    "<" then "img src ="  then cut ands paste the jpg or gif file url into your post and then ">"
35
posted on 
12/24/2004 8:12:28 AM PST
by 
BenLurkin
(Big government is still a big problem.)
 
To: eastforker
    Yes. Cro Magnon or 
Homo Spaiens Sapiens appeared very suddenly about only 40,000 years ago.
Myself . . . I'm in the God camp, but I hear what you're saying.
 
36
posted on 
12/24/2004 8:14:13 AM PST
by 
BenLurkin
(Big government is still a big problem.)
 
To: BenLurkin
    When I was in grade school, a parochial Lutheran school 40 years ago, we were taught that dinosaurs never existed since it was not mentioned in the bible.
 
37
posted on 
12/24/2004 8:20:43 AM PST
by 
eastforker
(Ask me about a free satellite TV system!)
 
To: ken21
     time to call in fart bell in pahrump, nv.
   
  
 Hey! I like Art! It's like science fiction without the science.
38
posted on 
12/24/2004 8:23:14 AM PST
by 
superskunk
(Quinn's Law:  Liberalism always produces the exact opposite of it's stated intent.)
 
To: BenLurkin
    
 How come this don't work?
 
39
posted on 
12/24/2004 8:24:06 AM PST
by 
JusPasenThru
(If you want to get it movin' you must learn to doof da bouven.)
 
To: BenLurkin
    I prefer:
  
 ' < img src="image.jpg" height=200 width=300>
  
  
 seems to display nicely with those dimensions.
40
posted on 
12/24/2004 8:27:00 AM PST
by 
superskunk
(Quinn's Law:  Liberalism always produces the exact opposite of it's stated intent.)
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson