Posted on 09/01/2004 2:36:56 PM PDT by longshadow
|
Mysterious signals from 1000 light years away |
| 19:00 01 September 04 |
|
In February 2003, astronomers involved in the search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI) pointed the massive radio telescope in Arecibo, Puerto Rico, at around 200 sections of the sky.
The same telescope had previously detected unexplained radio signals at least twice from each of these regions, and the astronomers were trying to reconfirm the findings. The team has now finished analysing the data, and all the signals seem to have disappeared. Except one, which has got stronger.
This radio signal, now seen on three separate occasions, is an enigma. It could be generated by a previously unknown astronomical phenomenon. Or it could be something much more mundane, maybe an artefact of the telescope itself.
But it also happens to be the best candidate yet for a contact by intelligent aliens in the nearly six-year history of the SETI@home project, which uses programs running as screensavers on millions of personal computers worldwide to sift through signals picked up by the Arecibo telescope.
“It’s the most interesting signal from SETI@home,” says Dan Werthimer, a radio astronomer at the University of California, Berkeley (UCB) and the chief scientist for SETI@home. “We’re not jumping up and down, but we are continuing to observe it.”
Named SHGb02+14a, the signal has a frequency of about 1420 megahertz. This happens to be one of the main frequencies at which hydrogen, the most common element in the universe, readily absorbs and emits energy.
Some astronomers have argued that extraterrestrials trying to advertise their presence would be likely to transmit at this frequency, and SETI researchers conventionally scan this part of the radio spectrum.
SHGb02+14a seems to be coming from a point between the constellations Pisces and Aries, where there is no obvious star or planetary system within 1000 light years. And the transmission is very weak.
“We are looking for something that screams out ‘artificial’,” says UCB researcher Eric Korpela, who completed the analysis of the signal in April. “This just doesn’t do that, but it could be because it is distant.”
The telescope has only observed the signal for about a minute in total, which is not long enough for astronomers to analyse it thoroughly. But, Korpela thinks it unlikely SHGb02+14a is the result of any obvious radio interference or noise, and it does not bear the signature of any known astronomical object.
That does not mean that only aliens could have produced it. “It may be a natural phenomenon of a previously undreamed-of kind like I stumbled over,” says Jocelyn Bell Burnell of the University of Bath, UK.
It was Bell Burnell who in 1967 noticed a pulsed radio signal which the research team at the time thought was from extraterrestrials but which turned out to be the first ever sighting of a pulsar.
There are other oddities. For instance, the signal’s frequency is drifting by between eight to 37 hertz per second. “The signal is moving rapidly in frequency and you would expect that to happen if you are looking at a transmitter on a planet that’s rotating very rapidly and where the civilisation is not correcting the transmission for the motion of the planet,” Korpela says.
This does not, however, convince Paul Horowitz, a Harvard University astronomer who looks for alien signals using optical telescopes. He points out that the SETI@home software corrects for any drift in frequency.
The fact that the signal continues to drift after this correction is “fishy”, he says. “If [the aliens] are so smart, they’ll adjust their signal for their planet’s motion.”
The relatively rapid drift of the signal is also puzzling for other reasons. A planet would have to be rotating nearly 40 times faster than Earth to have produced the observed drift; a transmitter on Earth would produce a signal with a drift of about 1.5 hertz per second.
What is more, if telescopes are observing a signal that is drifting in frequency, then each time they look for it they should most likely encounter it at a slightly different frequency. But in the case of SHGb02+14a, every observation has first been made at 1420 megahertz, before it starts drifting. “It just boggles my mind,” Korpela says.
The signal could be an artefact that, for some reason, always appears to be coming from the same point in the sky. The Arecibo telescope has a fixed dish reflector and scans the skies by changing the position of its receiver relative to the dish.
When the receiver reaches a certain position, it might just be able to reflect waves from the ground onto the dish and then back to itself, making it seem as if the signal was coming from space.
“Perhaps there is an object on the ground near the telescope emitting at about this frequency,” Korpela says. This could be confirmed by using a different telescope to listen for SHGb02+14a.
There is also the possibility of fraud by someone hacking the SETI@home software to make it return evidence for an extraterrestrial transmission. However, SHGb02+14a was seen on two different occasions by different SETI@home users, and those calculations were confirmed by others.
Then the signal was seen a third time by the SETI@home researchers. The unusual characteristics of the signal also make it unlikely that someone is playing a prank, Korpela says. “As I can’t think of any way to make a signal like this, I can’t think of any way to fake it.”
David Anderson, director of SETI@home, remains sceptical but curious about the signal. ”It’s unlikely to be real but we will definitely be re-observing it.” Bell Burnell agrees that it is worth persisting with. “If they can see it four, five or six times it really begins to get exciting,” she says.
It is already exciting for IT engineers Oliver Voelker of Logpoint in Nuremberg, Germany and Nate Collins of Farin and Associates in Madison, Wisconsin, who found the signal.
Collins wonders how his bosses will react to company computers finding aliens. “I might have to explain a little further about just how much I was using [the computers],” he says.
|
|
Eugenie Samuel Reich |
We can answer immediately if we use quantum entanglement.
RA should be the one responding to your question, but since he's probably off flogging some submissive wench in the "control room", I'll do my best in his absence.
AFAIK, SETI looks for a carrier wave. I don't know much about SS433 type objects, but my impression was that there is NO known natural process for producing a carrier wave.
Additionally, if an SS433 type object were there, it should be radiating all sorts of EM all over the spectrum, not just at 1420Mhz, right? The accretion disk ought to be putting out lots of energy, even in the X-ray region, I should think. But they apparently haven't found either an optical or "normal" radio source in this location.
If I had to guess, I'd go with it being either some sort of anomaly (s/w bug?), or some sort of terrestrial (or internal) signal that is leaking into the system when they "point" it at this location.
Now, if they can confirm this signal from a second radio telescope, that's a horse of a different color.....
Just AlGore pinging his lock box.
Now, now. You know that quantum entanglement can't be used to send an FTL signal. No fair deliberately sending a thread down the path of kookery...although I suppose that on this thread, it's unavoidable.
Nah, it says, "Friends, Romans, Countrymen lend me your ear"
You wrote:
"unless they're coming to seek revenge for us having broadcast My Mother The Car 35 years ago). "
Humor columnist Dave Barry also considered something like this in a column long ago--he suggested, though, that
Carl Sagan's plaque would label us as galactic/intergalactic perverts ('the man on the plaque is clearly deranged. He's waving his hand as if to say "HA!
I'm as naked as a jaybird."')
He suggests the aliens LIKE our TV re-runs. :-)
You wrote:
"that's a horse of a different color....."
Yeah, beat that dead horse </g>
Why search for intelligent life elsewhere in the
Universe when we can't find it _here_?
Like we need more Kerry Voters from Outer Space (TM) </g>
Is it too late for a 54 y.o. non-math-inclined guy to get into SETI?
A dark dwarf, not part of a binary system, with a hole in its side?
A carrier wave is just a narrowband EM emission that can be modulated. There are plenty of natural ways to make a narrowband EM emission, such as a hydrogen spectral line, as is the case here. As for whether there is any (intelligent) modulation, they probably haven't checked, yet.
Additionally, if an SS433 type object were there, it should be radiating all sorts of EM all over the spectrum, not just at 1420Mhz, right?
The thing about SS433 is that it puts out a discrete hydrogen spectrum from relativistic atomic hydrogen. What makes SS433 such a "special star" (that's what the SS stands for) is that the hydrogen is relativistic. Just about any process you can imagine to make hydrogen relativistic will ionize the hydrogen, and ionized hydrogen puts out a continuous broadband spectrum, rather than a series of narrow spectral lines.
In this case, the hydrogen is atomic, but while it doesn't seems to be significantly doppler-shifted (since the 1420 line seems to be in the right place), it does have some periodicity. If we were looking at an SS433-type object from an equatorial direction, we may not see much doppler shifting, but there may be a periodic frequency wandering due to the precession of the object. The precession period for SS433 is 163 days, rather longer than the period for this object, it seems.
The Pak fleet, headed here?
Not enough Berilium in the spectrum. That would lead to a larger shift than 30 hz
Relax. The message wasn't addressed to you. I wish you guys would stop trying to read my mail.
Go to SETI at Home ^ and join the group "Freepers".
You don't understand. SETI is Vade's only hope of meeting girls.
Out of curiousity: what velocities would cause 8 and 37 hertz shifts in a 1420 Mhz carrier?
Doing the math, I come up with 1.690 and 7.816 m/s, respectively (3.781 and 17.486 MPH).
IMO: It looks like the aliens are stuck behind a school bus...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.